Text 1931, 45 rader
Skriven 2006-06-28 01:35:25 av Alex Shakhaylo (2:461/701)
   Kommentar till text 1880 av Alan Ianson (1:153/757)
Ärende: Z7 again
================
*** Answering a msg seen in area CC (CC).

Hi, Alan!

25 Jun 06 13:50, Alan Ianson said to Alex Shakhaylo:

 AS>> I feel that current FidoNet administration is going to put Z7
 AS>> question into a long box. There they are, in their power. But as
 AS>> for me I'm in power to revoke this question again and again
 AS>> :) Well. So why our IC's (whoever they are) ignore this question.
 AS>> I feel a kind of injustice there and a kind of neglection. I don't
 AS>> need such an indifferent administration !

 AI> What is Z7 and why is it a good idea?

Oh, yes !

There is at least the two different approaches to Z7 idea.

The first one is to move Z2:R45,46,50 there, as long as they are
the quite special cases, where western people hardly can feel
comfortably and opposite is also true.

The second one is to create Z7 as a duty-free zone, where
Policy (as long as it cannot be changed ni traditional way)
would have only advisory vote. Participation there is assumed
voluntary, but the new alive *C's would give a real chance to
overcome needed quorum to change Policy which we all know needed
to be changed long long ago.

 AI> The natural flow of things is to grow and change. Of course we only
 AI> want good change.. :) I don't know if Z7 would be a good change or
 AI> not, I have never concidered it and don't know what it's all about.
 AI> If you don't mind spelling it out for those of us who don't know it
 AI> just may generate some interest/change.

Good and bad depends on your point of view. The only objective bad
I see could be the Policy change (because of addon to the total *C
quontity). In any case new *Cs themselves would not do anything without
other *Cs support.

Bye, Sinc, Alex

--- GoldED/W32 3.0.1
 * Origin: , (2:461/701)