Text 10324, 80 rader
Skriven 2006-03-25 14:35:34 av Glenn Meadows (1:379/45)
  Kommentar till text 10299 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Questions Re: Audio Ripping
=======================================
From: "Glenn Meadows" <gmeadow@comcast.net>

WinLame is a good wrapper around the basic encoder, I use it all the time to
make MP3's we ship to radio.  320kb/sec fixed rate.

--

Glenn M.
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
news:nhj622t9l6scnsbdedebl0pfea8gcfqf3v@4ax.com...
>
> LAME is reputed to be very good for lossy ripping at the higher
> bitrates, some say the best.
>
> http://lame.sourceforge.net/
>
>  /m
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:22:38 -0500, "Gary Britt"
> <email@from_Gary_Britt.org> wrote:
>
>>How up to date is the LAME encoder?  I've got a Creative PlayCenter 2
>>software encoder from a 3 year old Sound Blaster Live card in one of my
>>machines, Windows Media Player 10 in my new XP laptop, and also what Nero
>>6
>>and 7 come with.  How does LAME compare to these?
>>
>>Anybody have any thoughts on if it makes much difference what software
>>encoder is used to do the ripping?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Gary
>>
>>"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
>>news:1lq3229dcmdkcruidcnk24tnqjmjqrslki@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> I ripped at 320kbps constant bitrate, joint stereo, using the LAME
>>> encoder.  I would have ripped lossless if I had enough disk space.
>>>
>>> I use CDex for ripping, and I set the error detection and correction to
>>> its maximum ("Paranoia, Full").  CDex tells you, on a per-track basis,
>>> how many errors it could not correct.   Out of about 2,000 CDs (26,000+
>>> songs) I ripped, I'd say there were about 50 tracks that had
>>> uncorrectable errors, usually 1 or 2 per track.
>>>
>>> I had 4 CD drives running the ripping.  Two on my main PC (dual-CPU,
>>> 500MHz Pentium 2 or 3), 515MB RAM.  Another on my notebook (500MHZ CPU
>>> (Pentium 2, 512MB), and another on a junker (probably a 400MHz Pentium
>>> something or other, with 256 MB memory).   All were running Windows
>>> 2000.
>>>
>>>   /m
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:12:53 -0500, "Gary Britt"
>>> <email@from_Gary_Britt.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >When ripping an audio CD to MP3 file format is it better to use
>>> >constant
>>bitrate or variable bitrate?  What about if you are ripping to WMA file
>>format.  Is it better to use constant bitrate or variable bitrate?
>>> >
>>> >When doing the ripping the CD ripper I set up auto configured for
>>> >digital
>>extraction and NO error correction.  Question:  Should I turn error
>>correction on for audio CD ripping?  Does error correction make much
>>difference during ripping to MP3/WMA files?
>>> >
>>> >What if I'm doing the audio CD ripping on a 500mhz Pentium III with 640
>>megs of ram and Win2K, would that knowledge change any of your answers
>>above?
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >
>>> >Gary
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)