Text 10393, 136 rader
Skriven 2006-03-28 12:11:00 av Chris (1:379/45)
  Kommentar till text 10392 av Chris (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Thunderbird
=======================
From: Chris <nospam@noemail>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Well, I'm learning more about PGP.  I don't use it much, but here is an
encrypted message I created, with the decrypted message to follow.

(Note: where you see "wouldn't you like to know?", I removed potentially
identifying and useful information for spammers.  If you REALLY want to email
me, check out QRZ for my callsign K7SLE.)

> Return-Path: <wouldn't you like to know?>
> X-Original-To: wouldn't you like to know?
> Delivered-To: wouldn't you like to know?
> Received: from wouldn't you like to know? (wouldn't you like to know?
[1.2.3.4])
>       by wouldn't you like to know? (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3169224D193
>       for <wouldn't you like to know?>; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:58:51 -0800 (PST)
> Received: from wouldn't you like to know? (wouldn't you like to know?
[1.2.3.4])
>       by wouldn't you like to know? (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
k2SJwm2J015558
>       for <wouldn't you like to know?>; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:58:48 -0800
>       (envelope-from wouldn't you like to know?)
> Received: from [1.2.3.4] by wouldn't you like to know?
>  (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
>  with ESMTPSA id <0IWU0028YSU06H@wouldn't you like to know?> for wouldn't you
like to know?; Tue,
>  28 Mar 2006 11:58:48 -0800 (PST)
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:58:42 -0800
> From: Chris Gauthier <wouldn't you like to know?>
> Subject: encrypted message
> To: Chris Gauthier <wouldn't you like to know?>
> Message-id: <44299572.3060700@wouldn't you like to know?>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
>
> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
> Charset: ISO-8859-1
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
>
> hQIOAzQ7Kv0lZnp2EAf+OuHpbS7jGm0j0PLGQzc9KfpEiHwH5bi609NsSKfi3hvu
> DDvCh6Cy52mqUJgL7D13Ey/ShvGI4/JrH0wx/B8n3VxDhRpc1V3zuAlrMNdmg6NG
> HQLkookpdSNBvZN5MXS4IqnO6dN1tuRvbETVLhJxtKx+f3/coGSXVlCyvjDnV8N6
> Szg3i100GN4ADbIWmIFvhK/1DwWOi5Cl3HAg0hXWXpDuYOFfD8nwvNx2p8BczsPI
> 3GuBJ5aoxHjXrZ0DKdwlnCjCEgbCxSeGDcAqxjPsbj8U0fy1/18YEb4bWb0z4Xov
> QTOA7M8GG6TOgH88Zn6qUiOZfjUCcIngzYx8Sa8HOQf+Ltxn6GrEh4900fiCT9N7
> LuqTxf44JZI4XyFfVrKporYJehe9heV5wsYliL6pVcdW6WYYcg96aaRWafd2FKuy
> J21Ovy6s8wym/xizGIG9tbrJApRoyXnXsYcJBCxJ7yIC/z/0kZxVVhGQ8vv4mKfF
> JKiiWSpF34pBv8X6d+ihp/Ge4rMKd7VhdHk99JIpjiHwQEwi9wjRhNoibrXWpnnO
> ANxaN6dm/6vHVWNhxSbyFVg0zBkf5OLu6JhYf8LQHLrIK0SF6V/6FkcPIOkgf4s4
> WHKC0/L/iRVJCWQw/n8JleA3chBNSK5bVBJtN20mi4noozZz0pDWsgv6RK1Ayv3M
> ntK8AUL00ZMgAZ2UHOBG9W+cRjoY0K/1c/lhqZrnib0WPzhqUTaT+OWZccwq/St3
> ZDsiFYDgg/ks2toLGljP7PMvbWBV1yQ8HtZ2wnDSx7puKVNI7pKeSSJCzeanpsDc
> eQZ9pt6RIBWpDSWPAw5Jnyt5FIONufSnGVPLFQ6pwORJlKHOjWXzDjmn4JvVLySg
> MvOmeKSefYVCofM+hLNy4Dpg6HL5U/k2yoRilbXPRTyu9EWQOOzptQzEQ02Zt4k=
> =1o43
> -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
>
>

And now the decrypted version (headers not included): Decrypted message; Good
signature from Chris Gauthier (K7SLE)
<email@address>
Key ID: 0x38F4A066 / Signed on: 3/28/2006 11:58 AM

This is an encrypted message.

Can you read it?

Chris

Chris wrote:
> No, not really.  The PGP Public Key is used if you want to send me an
> encrypted message.  My private key is not available to the general
> populous because it's just that...private (and used to decode the
> messages encrypted with the public key).
>
> The reason you can read the message is because I did not encrypt the
> message.  Signing the message with my PGP key is like a digital
> signature, if you will permit the analogy.  You can examine the
> signature and compare it to the signature found on the various PGP Key
> repositories.  For example, in alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim, there is
> a poster named Lawn Dart who signs her messages.  I have a plug-in for
> Thunderbird that examines the PGP key and, if I choose, can validate it
> against the repositories.  The US-CERT signs all of their messages, too.
>  Part of this is to verify the authenticity of a message.  Ok, I've
> rambled and confused it all around.  Can someone make better sense of
> what I am saying?
>
> Also, for Antti's benefit (and with Geo's tolerance), I will post a
> duplicate of this message in an encrypted form.
>
> /Chris
>
>
> Antti Kurenniemi wrote:
>>> Zoink -> quick jump to a whole different topic here: What's with the "PGP
>>> signed message" stuff in this posting? I see it sometimes, but I don't
>>> really get it. I though PGP was some sort of message encrypting system, but
>>> the message source here is in plain text, and I sure don't have to enter
any
>>> keys or anything like that to read these messages. Or is this "security by
>>> giving an impression of security"? <g>
>>>
>>>
>>> Antti Kurenniemi
>>>
>>> "Chris" <nospam@noemail> wrote in message news:44287685$1@w3....
>>> I use Thunderbird for Mail, News, and RSS feeds.  I even have multiple
>>> news servers.  I posted a screenshot of my setup in the binaries.
>>> (subj: Thunderbird)
>>>
>>> /Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Ings wrote:
>>>>>> Anybody here use or have tried Thunderbird for news reading? I've been
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> Outlook Express for years for that, it works fine, but I'm curious if
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> worth the time to try Thunderbird.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFEKZhU3xaBfzj0oGYRAkeSAJsFTkLRXfGyhOMlZ8PG3n76to17AgCgyiTz
rNUvTEuzOR8nDlDXdKb8cS4=
=tgqE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)