Fidonet echomail

Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English Information Debug

OS2BBS 0/787
OS2DOSBBS 0/580
OS2HW 0/42
OS2INET 0/37
OS2LAN 0/134
OS2PROG 0/36
OS2REXX 0/113
OS2USER-L 207
OS2 0/4786
OSDEBATE 0/18996
PASCAL 0/490
PERL 0/457
PHP 0/45
POINTS 0/405
POLITICS 0/29554
POL_INC 0/14731
PSION 103
R20_ADMIN 1123
R20_AMATORRADIO 0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET 13
R20_CHAT 0/893
R20_DEPP 0/3
R20_DEV 399
R20_ECHO2 1379
R20_ECHOPRES 0/35
R20_ESTAT 0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT 0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM 0/22
R20_FIDONET 0/248
R20_FILEFIND 0/24
R20_FILEFOUND 0/22
R20_HIFI 0/3
R20_INFO2 3252
R20_INTERNET 0/12940
R20_INTRESSE 0/60
R20_INTR_KOM 0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT 42
R20_KANDIDAT 28
R20_KOM_DEV 112
R20_KONTROLL 0/13302
R20_KORSET 0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK 0/24
R20_MODERATOR 0/1852
R20_NC 76
R20_NET200 245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS 0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX 0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR 0/1
R20_REC2NEC 534
R20_SFOSM 0/341
R20_SF 0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH 0/1
R20_SQUISH 107
R20_TEST 2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET 12
RAR 0/9
RA_MULTI 106
RA_UTIL 0/162
REGCON.EUR 0/2056
REGCON 0/13
SCIENCE 0/1206
SF 0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT 0/5146
SHAREWRE 0/14
SIMPSONS 0/169
STATS_OLD1 0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2 0/2530
STATS_OLD3 0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4 0/1692.25
SURVIVOR 0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER 0/3
SYSOP 0/84
TAGLINES 0/112
TEAMOS2 0/4530
TECH 0/2617
TEST.444 0/105
TRAPDOOR 0/19
TREK 0/755
TUB 0/290
UFO 0/40
UNIX 0/1316
USA_EURLINK 0/102
USR_MODEMS 0/1
VATICAN 0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS 0/14
VIRUS 0/378
VIRUS_INFO 0/201
VISUAL_BASIC 0/473
WHITEHOUSE 0/5187
WIN2000 0/101
WIN32 0/30
WIN95 0/4289
WIN95_OLD1 0/70272
WINDOWS 0/1517
WWB_SYSOP 0/419
WWB_TECH 0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC 0/1
ZEC 4

4DOS 0/134
ABORTION 0/7
ALASKA_CHAT 0/506
ALLFIX_FILE 0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1 0/7997
ALT_DOS 0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO 0/1039
AMIGASALE 0/14
AMIGA 0/331
AMIGA_INT 0/1
AMIGA_PROG 0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP 0/26
ANIME 0/15
ARGUS 0/924
ASCII_ART 0/340
ASIAN_LINK 0/651
ASTRONOMY 0/417
AUDIO 0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING 0/105
BABYLON5 0/17862
BAG 135
BATPOWER 0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH 0/382
BBSLAW 0/109
BBS_ADS 0/5290
BBS_INTERNET 0/507
BIBLE 0/3563
BINKD 0/1119
BINKLEY 0/215
BLUEWAVE 0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS 0/25
CBM 0/46
CDRECORD 0/66
CDROM 0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER 0/378
COMICS 0/15
CONSPRCY 0/899
COOKING 33461
COOKING_OLD1 0/24719
COOKING_OLD2 0/40862
COOKING_OLD3 0/37489
COOKING_OLD4 0/35496
COOKING_OLD5 9370
C_ECHO 0/189
C_PLUSPLUS 0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN 0/201
DOORGAMES 0/2065
DOS_INTERNET 0/196
duplikat 6002
ECHOLIST 0/18295
EC_SUPPORT 0/318
ELECTRONICS 0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER 1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC 0/13
ENET.POLITICS 0/4
ENET.SOFT 0/11701
ENET.SYSOP 33946
ENET.TALKS 0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR 0/2000
EVOLUTION 0/1335
FDECHO 0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE 0/7068
FIDONEWS 24159
FIDONEWS_OLD1 0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2 0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3 0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4 0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP 12852
FIDO_UTIL 0/180
FILEFIND 0/209
FILEGATE 0/212
FILM 0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH 4436
FN_SYSOP 41708
FN_SYSOP_OLD1 71952
FTP_FIDO 0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC 0/13615
FUNNY 0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR 0/71
GET_INFO 105
GOLDED 0/408
HAM 0/16075
HOLYSMOKE 0/6791
HOT_SITES 0/1
HTMLEDIT 0/71
HUB203 466
HUB_100 264
HUB_400 39
HUMOR 0/29
IC 0/2851
INTERNET 0/424
INTERUSER 0/3
IP_CONNECT 719
JAMNNTPD 0/233
JAMTLAND 0/47
KATTY_KORNER 0/41
LAN 0/16
LINUX-USER 0/19
LINUXHELP 0/1155
LINUX 0/22112
LINUX_BBS 0/957
mail 18.68
mail_fore_ok 249
MENSA 0/341
MODERATOR 0/102
MONTE 0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA 0/1245
MUFFIN 0/783
MUSIC 0/321
N203_STAT 930
N203_SYSCHAT 313
NET203 321
NET204 69
NET_DEV 0/10
NORD.ADMIN 0/101
NORD.CHAT 0/2572
NORD.FIDONET 189
NORD.HARDWARE 0/28
NORD.KULTUR 0/114
NORD.PROG 0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE 0/88
NORD.TEKNIK 0/58
NORD 0/453
OCCULT_CHAT 0/93

Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter

Text 11107, 107 rader
Skriven 2006-05-26 08:51:48 av Rich (1:379/45)
  Kommentar till text 11104 av Don Hills (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: ODF alliance fearful
================================
From: "Rich" <@>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_013E_01C680A1.A015A1A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   If it is not optimized for its native format, what is it optimized =
for?

   Can you explain how there is any difference in ease to optimize for a =
specification with or without a stamp of approval from anyone else?  Are = the
open office folks suddenly able to do a better job with their = implementation
of their own specification now?

Rich

  "Don Hills" <black.hole.4.spam@gmail.com> wrote in message =
news:bkqdEtgaXOZW092yn@attglobal.net...
  In article <44766899$1@w3.nls.net>, "Rich" <@> wrote:
  >   If you mean the fear of the odf alliance, you sure can.   Did you
  >notice the very interesting comment from their managing director "He
  >added that OpenOffice.org was not initially optimised for ODF, but =
will
  >be in the future."  Isn't odf the native format of openoffice?  If =
it's
  >not optimized for its native format, what is it optimized for?

  Was that FUD, or were you trying to make a joke?
  Regardless, the answer to your question is: Nothing, at the moment.
  It will be optimised for ODF in the future. It makes perfect sense =
once
  you go and find out what the real story is - much easier to do with =
open
  standards than proprietary standards.

  --=20
  Don Hills
------=_NextPart_000_013E_01C680A1.A015A1A0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; If it is not optimized for =
its native=20
format, what is it optimized for?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; Can you explain how there =
is any=20
difference in ease to optimize for a specification with or without a = stamp
of=20
approval from anyone else?&nbsp; Are the open office folks suddenly able =
to=20
do&nbsp;a better job with their implementation of their own = specification=20
now?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Don Hills" &lt;<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:black.hole.4.spam@gmail.com">black.hole.4.spam@gmail.com</=
A>&gt;=20
  wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:bkqdEtgaXOZW092yn@attglobal.net">news:bkqdEtgaXOZW092yn@attg=
lobal.net</A>...</DIV>In=20
  article &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:44766899$1@w3.nls.net">44766899$1@w3.nls.net</A>&gt;, =
"Rich"=20
  &lt;@&gt; wrote:<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; If you mean the fear of the odf =
alliance,=20
  you sure can.&nbsp;&nbsp; Did you<BR>&gt;notice the very interesting =
comment=20
  from their managing director "He<BR>&gt;added that OpenOffice.org was =
not=20
  initially optimised for ODF, but will<BR>&gt;be in the future."&nbsp; =
Isn't=20
  odf the native format of openoffice?&nbsp; If it's<BR>&gt;not =
optimized for=20
  its native format, what is it optimized for?<BR><BR>Was that FUD, or =
were you=20
  trying to make a joke?<BR>Regardless, the answer to your question is: =
Nothing,=20
  at the moment.<BR>It will be optimised for ODF in the future. It makes =
perfect=20
  sense once<BR>you go and find out what the real story is - much easier =
to do=20
  with open<BR>standards than proprietary standards.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Don=20
  Hills&nbsp;&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_013E_01C680A1.A015A1A0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)