Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3221
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13273
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32953
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2061
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33903
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24128
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4408
FN_SYSOP   41679
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13599
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16070
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22093
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   926
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 11738, 157 rader
Skriven 2006-06-22 23:45:38 av Mark (1:379/45)
  Kommentar till text 11736 av Rich Gauszka (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: AT&T - we own your records sucker!!!
================================================
From: "Mark" <nomail@hotmail.com>

I take your point Rich, because I'm not real happy with this either.

But, I maintain that it came to this because of that overheated "outrage" by
the press (and the usual high-profile "want attention 'cause we're so
important" Dems in office) over the NSA program that they were wont to
immediately categorize as "domestic spying" before they tied their shoelaces in
the morning (assuming they don't all wear Birkenstocks by now) and thought
about it for a second, thus opening the door for the ambulance chasers.

"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:449b6185@w3.nls.net...
> Sorry I really disagree with your reasoning.   Like some other providers
> all AT&T had to do was tell the government that information could only be
> passed to them with a court order. Instead AT&T after the negative
> publicity for their actions  is now screwing their customers. What
> rationale is there for them to keep track of my purchases at Yahoo's
> EnglishTeaStore? Or to track anyone's TV viewing habits without there
> express consent? The answer is there is none
>
>
>
>
> "Mark" <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:449b5fff$1@w3.nls.net...
>>I dunno, I'm not real big on this stuff either, but the article you
>>reference strikes me as an example of the simple unintended consequences
>>of the over-baked, inaccurate, very loud, outcry, about "domestic spying"
>>that the media embraced with gusto and that resulted in the "privacy
>>group" filing suit against AT&T et al.
>>
>> From the article: "AT&T made the change as it fights against a lawsuit
>> filed by a privacy group that accuses the company of helping
>> anti-terrorism officials monitor networks without court-approved
>> warrants."
>>
>> All they're trying to do is avoid the frivolous lawsuits that cost them,
>> and in turn, their customers, big bucks, because those same "privacy"
>> groups are incensed that AT&T is actually "helping" anti-terrorism
>> officials, indeed they "accuse" them of same, well la-di-dah ain't they
>> special in their support of our enemies. <blow me up instead of capturing
>> the terrorists Mr. Lawyer, thank you very much, and where will you get
>> your fee when we're all dead?>
>>
>>
>> "Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:449b5396@w3.nls.net...
>>> This is the part that riles me. It's a shame as I really liked the
>>> EnglishTeaStore on Yahoo but now I'll just have to make my feelings
>>> known to the merchants that have affiliated themselves with Yahoo and
>>> thus are in partnership with AT&T.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8IDHDT01.htm?sub=apn_tech_dow
n&chan=tc
>>> Under the new policy, AT&T will collect customers' user names,
>>> passwords, charges, payments and online purchases. It will also track
>>> their clicks while on sites that AT&T operates in a partnership with
>>> Yahoo Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>> "/m" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
>>> news:rbim92pofa0bsjnbci7089jkeir3jij30b@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> As a potential customer of AT&T in the IPTV arena, I can now state that
>>>> I will continue to ship my monthly TV subscription costs to Comcast.  I
>>>> had been looking to AT&T to bring some competition to the
>>>> TV-distribution market in my local area, however it now appears that
>>>> AT&T have imposed far too onerous terms to their subscription
>>>> agreements.
>>>>
>>>> I just hope that AT&T send me postage-paid cards that ask me to sign up
>>>> with their TV service.  It's been a while since I've taped the cards to
>>>> bricks and dropped them in the mailbox....
>>>>
>>>> /m
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:31:49 -0400, "Rich Gauszka"
>>>> <gauszka@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Following Microsoft's lead to phone home, AT&T declares they are the
>>>>>phone
>>>>>and own your data. They have also said they would track your AT&T cable
>>>>>TV
>>>>>viewing habits so just leave the tv on FoxNews while it is unattended
>>>>><g>
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/25968prs20060622.html
>>>>>
>>>>>NEW YORK -- Changes that AT&T has instituted in its privacy policy are
>>>>>a
>>>>>completely inadequate response to the company's apparent betrayal of
>>>>>its
>>>>>customers' privacy by illegally providing calling information to the
>>>>>NSA.
>>>>>
>>>>>The changes, as first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, claim
>>>>>ownership over its customers' records and sweeping new language
>>>>>describing
>>>>>the company's uses of the records, including any purpose "involving
>>>>>potential threats to the physical safety of any person."  Given that
>>>>>even
>>>>>the vaguest hunch by the lowest-ranking security guard could qualify as
>>>>>a
>>>>>"potential threat," AT&T appears to be trying to give itself license to
>>>>>do
>>>>>whatever it sees fit with customers' data.
>>>>>
>>>>>It has always been a part of the story that AT&T apparently violated
>>>>>its
>>>>>former privacy policy, but that has never been the central problem with
>>>>>the
>>>>>reported program.  If the allegations are true, AT&T could somewhat
>>>>>reduce
>>>>>its liability for any participation in "The Program" once the new
>>>>>policy
>>>>>goes into effect on Friday.  But such cooperation would still be
>>>>>illegal.
>>>>>Privacy policies do not trump the laws of the U.S. or individual
>>>>>states.
>>>>>For example, Congress has explicitly banned telecoms from providing
>>>>>customers' calling information to the government outside of the
>>>>>specific
>>>>>legal channels created by Congress.  Many states have similar laws.
>>>>>
>>>>>And even more fundamentally, by secretly providing customer data to the
>>>>>government outside of any legal channel, AT&T has violated the privacy
>>>>>expectations of Americans - not just the terms of some legalistic
>>>>>privacy
>>>>>policy, but their basic expectations for how private communications
>>>>>will be
>>>>>treated in America.
>>>>>
>>>>>No tweaks to any fine-print click-through contract unilaterally imposed
>>>>>on
>>>>>its customers (and changed at will) can alter that fact.  We at the
>>>>>ACLU
>>>>>have always maintained that the twisted legalese in corporate "privacy
>>>>>statements" is a poor substitute for overarching privacy laws that all
>>>>>other
>>>>>industrialized nations have adopted.  But in the NSA spying scandal, we
>>>>>have
>>>>>the all-too-rare instance where existing laws actually do cover the
>>>>>behavior
>>>>>at issue, making changes to AT&T's privacy policy nothing more than an
>>>>>exercise in spin control.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)