Text 12934, 153 rader
Skriven 2006-09-11 17:07:48 av /m (1:379/45)
Ärende: Microsoft Vista is still a mess
=======================================
From: /m <mike@barkto.com>
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=34268
UAC is now "ridiculously annoying".
===
WE'VE HAD THE pleasure of using Vista since its very early builds. The first
release candidate is now upon us, and was made available to download by
TechBeta and Technology Adoption Program program subscribers last week.
MSDN and TechNet subscribers should now also be able to grab the near-complete
RC1 release, build number 5600. One INQUIRER columnist has already given us his
positive and then negative spin on RC1, and further testing from this hack has
uncovered further problems.
Throughout the testing of the past releases, it was strikingly evident how
incomplete Vista's code was. Various incomplete features, missing graphics,
place-holder text messages, and a plethora of bugs, left many feeling very
underwhelmed, and increasingly worried by the next operating system from
Microsoft.
A release candidate should consist of all features that will appear in the
finished product, in an almost final state, with simple bug fixing and
last-minute problem finding being the main concerns of the testers and
developers. A beta 2 'pre-RC1' build, numbered 5536, of Vista was only recently
made available for download just before RC1, and was considered surprisingly
stable and bug-free compared to previous betas. RC1, then, should easily cope
under scrutiny from the INQUIRER.
Installation
The install didn't go well. The test system had a Nvidia based RAID setup over
two SATA disks which had been running XP perfectly for some time. Vista refused
to see the RAID, even with beta Vista-specific drivers from Nvidia. Booting
Vista from within XP allowed setup to see the hard-disks, but after the
preliminary setup routines, and a reboot, Vista failed to again see the drives.
Searching Nvidia forums gave an answer - load the Vista specific drivers in an
XP-based Vista setup even when it recognizes the RAID. The install then worked.
Its surprising one of the most utilised RAID supporting motherboardchipsets
from one of the biggest suppliers of chipsets are still having problems with
their Vista drivers at this very late stage.
Previous critical examination of Microsoft's new beloved font types in our
Office 2007 articles seems to have fallen on deaf ears - the installation font
looked awful, with random spacing occurring between letters much like that in
the Office beta's. It looks amateurish at best.
Further hardware problems came from the very popular Creative Audigy card that
was utilised in the test system. Vista failed to recognize the card, so a quick
look on Creative's site uncovered Vista specific drivers. A quick install and
reboot, ensured a consistent BSOD on boot. Resorting back to the last known
good configuration sorted this, and an install of the older XP drivers seemed
to work without any further problems. Again it's surprising and very disturbing
that a driver for such a popular sound device is still at a very poor stage in
development.
Rebooting
Some drivers were previously copied onto a USB memory stick for quick
installation once Vista was up and running. Vista automatically recognized the
USB memory stick, as you'd expect, but copying a file to the desktop failed
(the copy dialog wouldn't complete) and a 0 byte file then remained on the
desktop which wasn't removable until a reboot.
Installing Windows Live Messenger worked fine. For some reason the build on
Microsoft's website was old and the program instantly asked if the newer
version should be installed. A quick download later, and the installation hung
and couldn't be closed without a reboot.
During setup you're asked to name your PC. On examining the test PC's name in
the networking properties, it was obvious this had at some point been discarded
- a further renaming was required, which then required a full reboot.
Installing Nvidia Nforce drivers for the system's motherboard required a reboot
- and on restarting Vista, another reboot was required to finish the
installation. So much for rebooting Windows less.
Media
Media center is now built in to Windows, as opposed to shipping as a separate
OS offering. It's had various GUI changes, but some of the older GUI still
exists - surely this should all be complete now, considering this is a release
candidate? Media player failed to bring up the 'first time setup' procedure on
the first attempt to try to play a video file and only audio could be heard
with no video, until media player was restarted and the aforementioned
procedure finally kicked into gear.
Performance
The test PC contained an Athlon64 3200+ on a Nvidia Nforce 4 chipset based
motherboard with 1gb RAM and a Geforce 7600GT - hardly awe inspiring, but a
decent entry/mid level PC, which runs XP and most modern games very happily.
Vista start up takes around 15-20 seconds longer than the old install of XP on
this machine, and takes around 10 seconds more to unload for a reboot. The OS
in general appears sluggish compared to XP and resource hungry - the memory
footprint on a fresh boot of Vista takes around 500-550mb without any other
tasks running, and the CPU never seems to run idle. The old program-loaded XP
install took around 300mb.
Interface
The partially-transparent windows look nice, but I'd prefer opaque boarders if
it meant the performance of XP. The 3D presentation of windows when flipping
between programs isn't particularly useful and isn't even the alt-tab default -
a thumbnail preview of the window appears, much like the Windows XP powertoy
add-on.
Where's the run command gone in the start menu? This is highly annoying, and
you often find yourself trying to quickly run a command window but having to
resort to the search function. The start menu no longer expands into an
observable tree like it has for the last 11 years, instead each level of the
tree appears in the main start menu pop up, which is particularly unnavigable
and unintuitive. Each folder within the explorer view seems to have its own
choice of folder viewing - one folder will show you thumbnail folder previews,
another will show you a simple list, with little consistency throughout the
contents of your hard-drive.
The level-up button that appeared in explorer has also disappeared. It's now
much more of a pain to transverse any folder tree. As Paul Thurrott points out
too, back buttons now tend (its highly inconsistent) to appear in the top left
hand corner of a window, whilst next buttons still appear in the bottom right -
a fairly counter-intuitive design decision.
The icons that appear in the bottom right task tray and the quick launch icons
are basic, unintuitive and could've been originally shipped with Windows 3.1.
User Account Control (UAC) is ridiculously annoying. It pops up far to
frequently when trying to configure your system and states administrator access
is required, even when you're an administrative user - clicking continue is all
that is required to bypass it, but the sluggish performance of Vista means the
pop up and dark screen effect makes the process take longer than needed.
Conclusion
Vista's still a mess. It's meant to be at release candidate stage, yet vendor's
are struggling to provide sufficient driver support, features are still missing
or not yet complete, and its performance compared to XP is still poor. Nowadays
hardware is cheap, and it would be sufficiently acceptable to upgrade in
anticipation of a wonderfully revolutionary OS. Unfortunately Vista provides
little to no benefit for end users compared to that of the previous version of
Windows, released five years ago in 2001.
There are no upgrades or features to the OS that are sufficiently compelling to
make upgrading a necessity, some which were earlier promised, allowed for
sufficient reason for an upgrade to be considered, but these have been removed
one by one over the course of Vista's prolonged patchy road of development, and
now Vista appears little more than an ill-performing version of XP with a
glorified interface. æ
===
/m
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|