Text 13000, 251 rader
Skriven 2006-09-21 13:43:16 av Rich (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Ripping verboten?
=============================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0374_01C6DD83.E449BD90
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
   What possible meaning of the word "rearranging" could mean this?
Rich
  "Glenn Meadows" <gmeadow@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:4512ed82$1@w3.nls.net...
  I took his "rearranging" to mean changing the file with time limited =
DRM=20
  code, not time shifting.
  --=20
  Glenn M.
  "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:4512e62c$1@w3.nls.net...
     No.  This is about the following statements from adam
    I wonder if it changes the file in any way. If
    so.....ummm....copyright....? If I own the file then like a movie or
    piece of music "rearranging without permission" etc is verboten.
  The rearranging to which he is referring is what you call format =
shifting.
  Rich
    "Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:45126772$2@w3.nls.net...
    what about format shifting to your ipod then sharing the files? =
That's=20
  what this is about yes?
    Geo.
      "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:4510efb3@w3.nls.net...
         I have always thought it OK rip your own CDs for your own use.  =
I=20
  have also thought it OK to further format shift into other formats =
including=20
  transfering to your ipod or other music player for your own use.  I'm =
pretty=20
  sure you have asserted this position as well in the past.  Only now do =
you=20
  act like an idiot with some silly position that it is illegal for =
apple to=20
  support format shifting in itunes if they try to make money on ipods =
and=20
  itunes.  Why haven't you been more vocal about your silly position for =
the=20
  past few years?
      Rich
        "Adam" <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes> wrote in message=20
  news:4510e6c8@w3.nls.net...
        Rich wrote:
        >    What an idiot.  You think I believe ripping is OK only =
because my
        > employer thinks it is OK?  What a hoot!
        Nope I think your views change as those of your employer change.
        > And your sudden assertion that
        > ripping is not OK is because of what?
        >
        I never said it was right to rip in order to make money. Home
        backup/format shifting by the person who has purchased the media =
etc=20
  is
        fine but to make money makes you into a publisher. You are the =
one who
        holds it's fine for people to rip so long as it makes your =
employer=20
  money.
        Adam
        > Rich
        >
        >
        >     "Adam" <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes
        >     <mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes>> wrote in message
        >     news:45100d5a@w3.nls.net...
        >     Rich wrote:
        >      >    Apparently you.  My views haven't changed.  You =
appear to=20
  take
        >     silly
        >      > positions at the drop of a hat.
        >      >
        >      > Rich
        >      >
        >      >
        >      >     "Adam" <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes
        >     <mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes>
        >      >     <mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes>> wrote in =
message
        >      >     news:450fecc9$1@w3.nls.net...
        >      >     Rich wrote:
        >      >      >    My views haven't changed.  I think it is OK =
to rip=20
  your own
        >      >     CDs for
        >      >      > your own use.  Always have.  You are changing =
your=20
  tune and
        >      >     looking like
        >      >      > a fool with your new very silly assertions.
        >      >      >
        >      >
        >      >
        >      >
        >      >     So Rich who is the fool/has his views dictated to =
him by=20
  his
        >     betters?
        >      >
        >      >     Adam
        >     Nope, You simply take whatever position your employer =
takes,=20
  which
        >     is in
        >     itself dictated by the search from profits.
        >
        >     Adam=20
------=_NextPart_000_0374_01C6DD83.E449BD90
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>   What possible meaning of =
the word=20
"rearranging" could mean this?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Glenn Meadows" <<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:gmeadow@comcast.net">gmeadow@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
  <A =
href=3D"news:4512ed82$1@w3.nls.net">news:4512ed82$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>I=20
  took his "rearranging" to mean changing the file with time limited DRM =
  <BR>code, not time shifting.<BR><BR>-- <BR><BR>Glenn M.<BR>"Rich" =
<@>=20
  wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:4512e62c$1@w3.nls.net">news:4512e62c$1@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>=
  =20
  No.  This is about the following statements from =
adam<BR><BR>  I=20
  wonder if it changes the file in any way. If<BR> =20
  so.....ummm....copyright....? If I own the file then like a movie =
or<BR> =20
  piece of music "rearranging without permission" etc is =
verboten.<BR><BR>The=20
  rearranging to which he is referring is what you call format=20
  shifting.<BR><BR>Rich<BR><BR>  "Geo" <<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:45126772$2@w3.nls.net">news:45126772$2@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>=
 =20
  what about format shifting to your ipod then sharing the files? That's =
  <BR>what this is about yes?<BR><BR>  Geo.<BR>    =
"Rich"=20
  <@> wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:4510efb3@w3.nls.net">news:4510efb3@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>&nbs=
p;     =20
  I have always thought it OK rip your own CDs for your own use.  I =
  <BR>have also thought it OK to further format shift into other formats =
  including <BR>transfering to your ipod or other music player for your =
own=20
  use.  I'm pretty <BR>sure you have asserted this position as well =
in the=20
  past.  Only now do you <BR>act like an idiot with some silly =
position=20
  that it is illegal for apple to <BR>support format shifting in itunes =
if they=20
  try to make money on ipods and <BR>itunes.  Why haven't you been =
more=20
  vocal about your silly position for the <BR>past few=20
  years?<BR><BR>    =
Rich<BR><BR>     =20
  "Adam" <<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes">mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes</=
A>>=20
  wrote in message <BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"news:4510e6c8@w3.nls.net">news:4510e6c8@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>&nbs=
p;    =20
  Rich wrote:<BR>      >    =
What an=20
  idiot.  You think I believe ripping is OK only because=20
  my<BR>      > employer thinks it is =
OK?  What=20
  a hoot!<BR><BR>      Nope I think your views =
change=20
  as those of your employer =
change.<BR><BR>      >=20
  And your sudden assertion that<BR>      > =
ripping=20
  is not OK is because of what?<BR>     =20
  ><BR><BR>      I never said it was right =
to rip in=20
  order to make money. Home<BR>      =
backup/format=20
  shifting by the person who has purchased the media etc=20
  <BR>is<BR>      fine but to make money makes =
you into=20
  a publisher. You are the one who<BR>      =
holds it's=20
  fine for people to rip so long as it makes your employer=20
  <BR>money.<BR><BR>     =20
  Adam<BR><BR>      >=20
  Rich<BR>      =
><BR>     =20
  ><BR>      >     =
"Adam"=20
  <<A=20
  =
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
 |