Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   14844/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3218
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13270
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32896
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2056
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33903
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24126
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4408
FN_SYSOP   41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13599
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16070
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22092
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   926
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 13421, 241 rader
Skriven 2006-10-22 08:27:52 av Robert Comer (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Vista should only be used with ECC memory?
======================================================
From: "Robert Comer" <bobcomer@mindspring.com>

That sucks.

--
Bob Comer


"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:453ae5df@w3.nls.net...
> On a side note Linux support for the Intel 965 chipset and Core 2 Duo
> really sucks for a CD/DVD install/live boot ( even tried the Kubuntu 6.10
> release candidate to no avail )
>
>
> http://www.codemonkeyx.net/node/12
> However, somewhere along the line the decision was made by the Linux
> kernel development community to not add support for the JMicron JMB368
> chip that pretty much every P965 motherboard is using to provide PATA
> drive support. Because there is currently no Kernel support for this chip
> you can not easily install Linux on any system if you have a PATA DVD-Rom
> drive or Hard-drive. With no DVD you can not install Linux unless you try
> doing a network boot, or use USB drives etc. But that is not practical for
> most people.
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Core_2_Duo_Support
>
>
>
> "Robert Comer" <bobcomer@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:45397203$1@w3.nls.net...
>>> It's a desktop with a E6600 2.4 ghz Core 2 Duo and 2 gig  ram.
>>
>> Cool, that should be even faster than my 5 month old Pentium 930 with 2GB
>> RAM.  You will get used to dual core pretty quickly.
>>
>>>I've already bled in the case though - usually a good sign as a sacrifice
>>>to the computer gods. <g>
>>
>> So was it the kind that you bleed all over everything before you noticed
>> the cut.  (that's the best way. <g>)
>>
>> I knuckled under on my 930, I actually got a Dell...
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:45393d33$1@w3.nls.net...
>>> It's a desktop with a E6600 2.4 ghz Core 2 Duo and 2 gig  ram. That's if
>>> I don't break anything assembling it. I've already bled in the case
>>> though - usually a good sign as a sacrifice to the computer gods. <g>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Robert Comer" <bobcomer@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4539202e@w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Thanks. I may install it anyway as I just purchased the components for
>>>>> a core 2 duo system and I need to really stress the mb, cpu  and
>>>>> memory before I install a stable OS on it. <g>
>>>>
>>>> Virtual machines...
>>>>
>>>> How much RAM and is it a laptop version of the CPU?
>>>>
>>>>> You probably just found one of the 1,400 bugs that RC2 shipped with.
>>>>
>>>> It's not an acknowledged bug by them, but I think it may be a symptom
>>>> of something that may be.
>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully that will be fixed when an RTM of 500 ( or less ) known bugs
>>>>> ships
>>>>
>>>> I doubt it. :(
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bob Comer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:45391a3c@w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Thanks. I may install it anyway as I just purchased the components for
>>>>> a core 2 duo system and I need to really stress the mb, cpu  and
>>>>> memory before I install a stable OS on it. <g>
>>>>>
>>>>> You probably just found one of the 1,400 bugs that RC2 shipped with.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully that will be fixed when an RTM of 500 ( or less ) known bugs
>>>>> ships
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Robert Comer" <bobcomer@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:45390f6f@w3.nls.net...
>>>>>> >I just saw some posts/responses on the
>>>>>> >Microsoft.public.vista.installation_setup forum that said RC2
>>>>>> >wouldn't install on less than 512. Of course the guy attempting the
>>>>>> >installation had only 256 mb but was able to install Vista under an
>>>>>> >earlier beta but not RC2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What can I say, I've installed it in less than 512M...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just did an msdn dl of RC2 last night and haven't attempted
>>>>>>> anything with it yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure I'd bother if I were you, it's not a real good quality
>>>>>> build and RTM is coming soon.  I can BSOD or lockup me new Pentium
>>>>>> 930 machine just by moving the mouse during boot.  (and that's just
>>>>>> the start of the problems.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bob Comer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4538f3fc$1@w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>I just saw some posts/responses on the
>>>>>>>Microsoft.public.vista.installation_setup forum that said RC2
>>>>>>>wouldn't install on less than 512. Of course the guy attempting the
>>>>>>>installation had only 256 mb but was able to install Vista under an
>>>>>>>earlier beta but not RC2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just did an msdn dl of RC2 last night and haven't attempted
>>>>>>> anything with it yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Robert Comer" <bobcomer@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:4538e7e7@w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>>> Vista RC2 won't even install if your memory is less than 500 mb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's not a true statement, 512M is just the recommended.  I've
>>>>>>>> installed it in less.  I wouldn't want to run it regularly in less,
>>>>>>>> but it does work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The 512M story came about because of a bug a few builds back...
>>>>>>>> (6-months ago)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and many of the recommendations I've seen lately for Vista are 1
>>>>>>>>> gig minimum, 2 gig comfortable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It depends on what you want to do and the GUI you want to run.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Bob Comer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4538e2e8$1@w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>>> Vista RC2 won't even install if your memory is less than 500 mb
>>>>>>>>> and many of the recommendations I've seen lately for Vista are 1
>>>>>>>>> gig minimum, 2 gig comfortable. I think that rules out a good
>>>>>>>>> portion of the computers currently out there. Microsoft's ECC
>>>>>>>>> recommendation was for the system builders and new Vista hardware.
>>>>>>>>> I doubt they care about upgrades of older hardware
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Gary Britt" <glb@gencog.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:4538d134$1@w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>>>> Most computers today aren't even setup to run with ECC so putting
>>>>>>>>>> ECC memory in one of these computers either wouldn't provide ECC
>>>>>>>>>> benefit or would keep the computer from even booting.  Isn't this
>>>>>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Funny, it used to be that all motherboards were ECC memory, then
>>>>>>>>>> windows 95 came in and suddenly all motherboards were non-ECC.
>>>>>>>>>> Now a new version of windows wants to go back to ECC??  Why did
>>>>>>>>>> we ever leave ECC to begin with? Was it to keep windows 95 from
>>>>>>>>>> crashing left and right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Rich Gauszka" <gauszka@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:4538c60c$1@w3.nls.net...
>>>>>>>>>>> It would be a good thing if all memory were ECC ( overclocking
>>>>>>>>>>> gamers would hate it though).  I doubt many of the low to mid
>>>>>>>>>>> end system builders will use ECC and it will be interesting to
>>>>>>>>>>> see how much a bad rap Vista gets due to flacky memory
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Mike N." <mike@u-spam-u-die.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:1obhj21b1g6bf2mpfv5f7njef031uls63v@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:54:12 -0400, "Rich Gauszka"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <gauszka@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nearly two years ago I met with Jim Allchin, co-President
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Platforms and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Services Division at Microsoft who headed the Vista development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>effort, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jim said Vista should only be used with ECC memory. Virtually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>every OEM had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>a fit and PR folks piled on Jim so he wouldn't say that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>anymore. However, my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>own experience with Vista suggests he may have been right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Ahhh ... the wisdom of the pajama consultant!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Vista uses memory aggressively and if there is a memory error
>>>>>>>>>>>> it will blue
>>>>>>>>>>>> screen."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   And what OS wouldn't blue screen?   It must be that Vista is
>>>>>>>>>>>> accessing
>>>>>>>>>>>> memory in different patterns that escaped previous usage and
>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>> patterns.   This is like the old OS/2 days where OS/2 was the
>>>>>>>>>>>> bad guy
>>>>>>>>>>>> because it tested all the RAM on the PC and crashed left and
>>>>>>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)