Fidonet echomail

Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English Information Debug

OS2BBS 0/787
OS2DOSBBS 0/580
OS2HW 0/42
OS2INET 0/37
OS2LAN 0/134
OS2PROG 0/36
OS2REXX 0/113
OS2USER-L 207
OS2 0/4786
OSDEBATE 1706/18996
PASCAL 0/490
PERL 0/457
PHP 0/45
POINTS 0/405
POLITICS 0/29554
POL_INC 0/14731
PSION 103
R20_ADMIN 1121
R20_AMATORRADIO 0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET 13
R20_CHAT 0/893
R20_DEPP 0/3
R20_DEV 399
R20_ECHO2 1379
R20_ECHOPRES 0/35
R20_ESTAT 0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT 0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM 0/22
R20_FIDONET 0/248
R20_FILEFIND 0/24
R20_FILEFOUND 0/22
R20_HIFI 0/3
R20_INFO2 3206
R20_INTERNET 0/12940
R20_INTRESSE 0/60
R20_INTR_KOM 0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT 42
R20_KANDIDAT 28
R20_KOM_DEV 112
R20_KONTROLL 0/13259
R20_KORSET 0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK 0/24
R20_MODERATOR 0/1852
R20_NC 76
R20_NET200 245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS 0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX 0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR 0/1
R20_REC2NEC 534
R20_SFOSM 0/340
R20_SF 0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH 0/1
R20_SQUISH 107
R20_TEST 2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET 12
RAR 0/9
RA_MULTI 106
RA_UTIL 0/162
REGCON.EUR 0/2056
REGCON 0/13
SCIENCE 0/1206
SF 0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT 0/5146
SHAREWRE 0/14
SIMPSONS 0/169
STATS_OLD1 0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2 0/2530
STATS_OLD3 0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4 0/1692.25
SURVIVOR 0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER 0/3
SYSOP 0/84
TAGLINES 0/112
TEAMOS2 0/4530
TECH 0/2617
TEST.444 0/105
TRAPDOOR 0/19
TREK 0/755
TUB 0/290
UFO 0/40
UNIX 0/1316
USA_EURLINK 0/102
USR_MODEMS 0/1
VATICAN 0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS 0/14
VIRUS 0/378
VIRUS_INFO 0/201
VISUAL_BASIC 0/473
WHITEHOUSE 0/5187
WIN2000 0/101
WIN32 0/30
WIN95 0/4288
WIN95_OLD1 0/70272
WINDOWS 0/1517
WWB_SYSOP 0/419
WWB_TECH 0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC 0/1
ZEC 4

4DOS 0/134
ABORTION 0/7
ALASKA_CHAT 0/506
ALLFIX_FILE 0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1 0/7997
ALT_DOS 0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO 0/1039
AMIGASALE 0/14
AMIGA 0/331
AMIGA_INT 0/1
AMIGA_PROG 0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP 0/26
ANIME 0/15
ARGUS 0/924
ASCII_ART 0/340
ASIAN_LINK 0/651
ASTRONOMY 0/417
AUDIO 0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING 0/105
BABYLON5 0/17862
BAG 135
BATPOWER 0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH 0/382
BBSLAW 0/109
BBS_ADS 0/5290
BBS_INTERNET 0/507
BIBLE 0/3563
BINKD 0/1119
BINKLEY 0/215
BLUEWAVE 0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS 0/25
CBM 0/46
CDRECORD 0/66
CDROM 0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER 0/378
COMICS 0/15
CONSPRCY 0/899
COOKING 32689
COOKING_OLD1 0/24719
COOKING_OLD2 0/40862
COOKING_OLD3 0/37489
COOKING_OLD4 0/35496
COOKING_OLD5 9370
C_ECHO 0/189
C_PLUSPLUS 0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN 0/201
DOORGAMES 0/2053
DOS_INTERNET 0/196
duplikat 6002
ECHOLIST 0/18295
EC_SUPPORT 0/318
ELECTRONICS 0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER 1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC 0/13
ENET.POLITICS 0/4
ENET.SOFT 0/11701
ENET.SYSOP 33888
ENET.TALKS 0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR 0/2000
EVOLUTION 0/1335
FDECHO 0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE 0/7068
FIDONEWS 24099
FIDONEWS_OLD1 0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2 0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3 0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4 0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP 12852
FIDO_UTIL 0/180
FILEFIND 0/209
FILEGATE 0/212
FILM 0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH 4393
FN_SYSOP 41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1 71952
FTP_FIDO 0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC 0/13598
FUNNY 0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR 0/71
GET_INFO 105
GOLDED 0/408
HAM 0/16069
HOLYSMOKE 0/6791
HOT_SITES 0/1
HTMLEDIT 0/71
HUB203 466
HUB_100 264
HUB_400 39
HUMOR 0/29
IC 0/2851
INTERNET 0/424
INTERUSER 0/3
IP_CONNECT 719
JAMNNTPD 0/233
JAMTLAND 0/47
KATTY_KORNER 0/41
LAN 0/16
LINUX-USER 0/19
LINUXHELP 0/1155
LINUX 0/22090
LINUX_BBS 0/957
mail 18.68
mail_fore_ok 249
MENSA 0/341
MODERATOR 0/102
MONTE 0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA 0/1245
MUFFIN 0/783
MUSIC 0/321
N203_STAT 924
N203_SYSCHAT 313
NET203 321
NET204 69
NET_DEV 0/10
NORD.ADMIN 0/101
NORD.CHAT 0/2572
NORD.FIDONET 189
NORD.HARDWARE 0/28
NORD.KULTUR 0/114
NORD.PROG 0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE 0/88
NORD.TEKNIK 0/58
NORD 0/453
OCCULT_CHAT 0/93

Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter

Text 1717, 155 rader
Skriven 2005-01-02 16:29:36 av Geo (1:379/45)
   Kommentar till text 1697 av Rich (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Usage history
=========================

From: "Geo" <georger@nls.net>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C4F0E8.40773690
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Most folks may not be paranoid but they are getting there.

As for your ISP, you are correct, if you don't trust them then find a = better
ISP. But that's not even close to the risk level I was talking = about. I'll
give you an example.

The other day my mother-in-law asked me to patch her laptop for her. = Wife
brought it home and I booted it and up comes XP with her name = showing on the
login so I clicked on it and it autologged in as her. I'm = sitting there at
this point thinking wouldn't this be wonderful if = someone stole her laptop.
So tell me how much should I trust the people = who wrote this login software?
Do you think it gave her all kinds of = warnings about how dangerous it is to
allow autologins especially on a = laptop or do you think they just made it
really easy for her to bypass = all the security in NT with the touch of a
button?

This is what I was saying before, it's not a question of passport, it's = a
question of people not trusting their computers. Go to a webpage and = get
rooted, have someone steal your laptop with autologin, this is not = the type
of a device you trust with your passwords, credit card numbers, = or financial
records and people are realizing this.

Geo.
  "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:41d78097$1@w3.nls.net...
     Nope.  With single sign-in you have the choice and can balance =
between your paranoia and ease of use.  In case you really are clueless, = most
folks are not paranoid.

     What you should really fear if you are the paranoid type is your =
ISP.  They can see and track everything you do.  It makes paranoia about = the
little bit of your activity that is authentication seem just silly.

  Rich

    "Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message news:41d775e4@w3.nls.net...
    "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:41d760be$1@w3.nls.net...

    >> If you want to authenticate but fear that someone may try to make
    correlations between your usage, use multiple identities.<<

    Kinda goes against the single login method of passport does it not?

    Geo.


------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C4F0E8.40773690
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1479" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Most folks may not be paranoid but they =
are getting=20
there.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As for your ISP, you are correct, if =
you don't=20
trust them then find a better ISP. But that's not even close to the risk =
level I=20
was talking about. I'll give you an example.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The other day my mother-in-law asked me =
to patch=20
her laptop for her. Wife brought it home and I booted it and up comes XP =
with=20
her name showing on the login so I clicked on it and it autologged in as =
her.=20
I'm sitting there at this point thinking wouldn't this be wonderful if =
someone=20
stole her laptop. So tell me how much should I trust the people who = wrote
this=20
login software? Do you think it gave her all kinds of warnings about how =

dangerous it is to allow autologins especially on a laptop or do you = think
they=20
just made it really easy for her to bypass all the security in NT with = the
touch=20
of a button?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This is what I was saying before, it's =
not a=20
question of passport, it's a question of people not trusting their = computers.
Go=20
to a webpage and get rooted, have someone steal your laptop with = autologin,
this=20
is not the type of a device you trust with your passwords, credit card =
numbers,=20
or financial records and people are realizing this.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Rich" &lt;@&gt; wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:41d78097$1@w3.nls.net">news:41d78097$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; Nope.&nbsp; With single =
sign-in you=20
  have the choice and can balance between your paranoia and ease of =
use.&nbsp;=20
  In case you really are clueless, most folks are not =
paranoid.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; What you should really =
fear if you=20
  are the paranoid type is your ISP.&nbsp; They can see and track =
everything you=20
  do.&nbsp; It makes paranoia about the little bit of your activity that =
is=20
  authentication seem just silly.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV>"Geo" &lt;<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>&gt;=20
    wrote in message <A=20
    =
href=3D"news:41d775e4@w3.nls.net">news:41d775e4@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>"R=
ich"=20
    &lt;@&gt; wrote in message <A=20
    =
href=3D"news:41d760be$1@w3.nls.net">news:41d760be$1@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>=
<BR>&gt;&gt;=20
    If you want to authenticate but fear that someone may try to=20
    make<BR>correlations between your usage, use multiple=20
    identities.&lt;&lt;<BR><BR>Kinda goes against the single login =
method of=20
    passport does it=20
not?<BR><BR>Geo.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C4F0E8.40773690--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)