Text 4297, 219 rader
Skriven 2005-05-22 11:39:16 av Randy (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 4281 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
Ärende: re: Shupak and chain saws
=================================
From: "Randy" <@>
In our little corner of the world, Shupak acts like a kid with a new chain saw:
everything is game for cutting down.
As for his behavior here, here's a thought: I don't belive that MSFT offers
training on being a boorish duplicitous asshole-they activiely seek it out and
reward it.
Have a look at http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/legal/buscond/ and do a search
for where the word "honest" appears.
Then I saw this:
"You may also call the Business Conduct Line at 1-877-320-MSFT (6738). If you
are calling from outside the United States, you may make a collect call to the
Business Conduct Line by accessing an international operator and asking to
place a collect call to 1-704-540-0139. The Business Conduct Line is a
dedicated, toll-free phone line that is available to you 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week, 365 days a year. It is operated by an external third-party vendor that
has trained professionals to take your calls, in confidence, and report your
concerns to the Microsoft Director of Compliance for appropriate action. Your
phone calls to the Business Conduct Line may be made anonymously. "
'nuff said?
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
news:fb0191li9skdil3l444686d38bgr5un24f@4ax.com...
>
> I think Joe Barr was just the first to see through Rich Shupak's
> diversionary tactics [among other thigns] in online discussions.
>
> What I wonder is if Microsoft's online persona go through some manner of
> training, because many of them seem to use the same tactics over and
> over.
>
> /m<shrug>
>
>
> On Sun, 22 May 2005 00:18:26 -0500, "Randy" <@> wrote:
>
>>Who whould have thought that Joe Barr is right.
>> "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:428eb385@w3.nls.net...
>> I find it hard to believe you can be such an idiot and not know it.
>> Read over your spin in this thread starting with your claims that
>> everyone except the itunes store is a loser. You are saying more than
>> the obvious that apple's investment in their itunes store is a bet. I
>> can't believe you have the audacity to state in one sentence that you are
>> voicing no opinion on the itunes store both after doing so and before
>> doing so again. You are spinning so fast you can't see.
>>
>> As for your follow on bullshit, there is no lock in and never was.
>> Unlike apple, Microsoft provides choice. Go ahead, continue your
>> dishonesty, and pretend you have none. Make sure you mention how you
>> have no choice everytime you mention your use any of the very large set
>> of non-Microsoft hardware, software, and services Microsoft enables for
>> Windows.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
>> news:mg5t819ipve721e41u345o5l2ebiv5p3ev@4ax.com...
>> > Keep spinning if that is what you need to live with yourself.
>>
>> I live with myself just fine Rich. I find no need to let computers
>> affect my living situation. But I have to wonder why you are
>> projecting?
>>
>>
>> > Do you really think the itunes store would sell the same if apple
>> did not lock in ipod users so that this was the only store they can use?
>>
>> I voice no opinion on the iTunes store. I merely say that Apple's
>> focus
>> is on iTunes and not necessarily iPod. iPod is the means, iTunes is
>> the end. And Microsoft is the also-ran, perhaps not even that.
>> Probably more of "too late to the party".
>>
>> Whenever Microsoft feels the need to trot out Mr. Gates to expound
>> upon
>> some "new direction", I know that Microsft has found themelves behind
>> the market leader and have belatedly realized that they need to try to
>> catch up.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> If users are not locked in, why would they pick the itunes store?
>>
>> Coming from a Microsoft employee, that is a very interesting comment.
>>
>> I mean, if the users were not locked into Windows, would they have
>> chosen IE over Netscape? It seems that Microsoft execs' emails
>> entered
>> as evidence in the anti-trist trials have stated that Microsoft needed
>> to leverage the Windows monopoly in order to make IE the defacto
>> browser
>> "of choice".
>>
>> If the users were not locked in, would they choose WIndows Media in
>> the
>> percentages that they currently do?
>>
>> /m<probably not...>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:56:30 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>>
>> > Keep spinning if that is what you need to live with yourself.
>> >
>> > Do you really think the itunes store would sell the same if apple
>> did not lock in ipod users so that this was the only store they can use?
>> >
>> > If users are not locked in, why would they pick the itunes store?
>> >
>> >Rich
>> >
>> > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
>> news:s93t81dqsvf1bvef5vjpukf6n5ukvof7dp@4ax.com...
>> >
>> > It must really suck for your employer to be the loser in the online
>> > music race, eh Rich?
>> >
>> > Despite what you are trying to spin me as saying, I am actually
>> saying
>> > that Apple is betting on iTunes (an/or its video successor), not
>> iPod.
>> > I say no more or no less. Despite what you try to spin.
>> >
>> > Give those rotator cuffs a rest for a change, will ya?
>> >
>> > /m
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 20 May 2005 17:15:01 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If you weren't blinded by your agenda, mike, you could see the
>> obvious and how silly you sound.
>> > >
>> > > Why will phones win out, for the same reason phones are winning
>> over many PDA users? Why carry two devices when you can carry one?
>> > >
>> > > Apple will follow Microsoft and I believe real in getting their
>> software onto phones. There is a difference from the ipod. Unless apple
>> restricts their OEM licensees from offering their users multiple choices,
>> the phone manufacturers and carriers have no reason to lock in their
>> customers to the itunes store like apple does.
>> > >
>> > >Rich
>> > >
>> > > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message
>> news:55ns81lbitvndvtrbj4407ueh8f7cbm5bo@4ax.com...
>> > >
>> > > It's not iPod that Apple is betting on, but iTunes (and its
>> video
>> > > follow-up). Apple is already putting iPod software on cell
>> phones to
>> > > allow them to access iTunes.
>> > >
>> > > Gates' comment was more of a specious smokescreen than anything
>> else.
>> > > Apple caught him napping in this space, and now he has to look
>> like he
>> > > was out in front all along.
>> > >
>> > > /m
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 20 May 2005 14:01:23 +0100, Adam
>> <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts@moes>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Randy wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I just 1 GB on my phone via miniSD-and I want MORE....
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 500+ of AAC-encoded songs-sweet!
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >Ditto. I agree with Gates that the Ipod won't last & that the
>> phones
>> > > >will eat it's lunch. I have a nokia 6230 which I got coz it has
>> an MP3
>> > > >player & an fm radio....
>> > > >
>> > > >A mondo bizarro bit is that if you are listening to the radio
>> or the mp3
>> > > >player & someone calls you get the selected ringing tones....so
>> if like
>> > > >me you often set your phone to silent for meetings etc & then
>> "forget"
>> > > >to re-enable the ringer....then you are left wondering what's
>> going on
>> > > >coz the music/radio just suddenly goes....silent....
>> > > >
>> > > ><G>
>> > > >
>> > > >I had a look at the smart phones (Pocket pc, symbian etc) & was
>> very
>> > > >impressed but @ the end of the day...I just wanted music +
>> radio & a
>> > > >nice neat (small) phone.
>> > > >
>> > > >I like the way most of them now try wifi first for any net
>> related things.
>> > > >
>> > > >I reckon we're 2-3 years out from most people's "personal"
>> computer
>> > > >being the smartphone in their pocket.
>> > > >
>> > > >Adam
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|