Text 4837, 230 rader
Skriven 2005-06-11 15:08:38 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 4835 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Speaking of entitlement :-)
========================================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0164_01C56E97.7231F1C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have no interest in your diversion and change of topic. I stayed =
with the original topic. Feel free to discuss the stock market all you = want.
Rich
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:78ima11fj0rkdmigubot7ignm6p6u45q9n@4ax.com...
I notice you conveniently avoided answering the question I asked, "So,
do you think Microsoft will return to the growth rate of, say, 1990 to
2000? =
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=3DMSFT&t=3Dmy&l=3Doff&z=3Dl&q=3Dl&c=3D = ", and
tried to divert the discussion into my alleged "agenda". =20
/m =20
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:33:52 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> And people came and left back them too. I realize you are trying =
hard to spin this to meet your agenda.
>
>Rich
>=20
> "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:sb3ma1th9d5tlvmjcan7obbbnmk4k5pvd1@4ax.com...
> So, do you think Microsoft will return to the growth rate of, say, =
1990
> to 2000?=20
>
> =
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=3DMSFT&t=3Dmy&l=3Doff&z=3Dl&q=3Dl&c=3D
>
> That's when it was a vibrant, growing company. That's when the use =
of
> the stock market to compensate employees actually worked, and =
enabled
> Microsoft to attract and retain "the best and the brightest".
>
> /m
>
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:49:43 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>
> > You believe whatever helps you feel better about yourself.
> >
> >Rich
> >
> > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:i4lla1lvjl9mcj1pa37j21nqevgnidfr2n@4ax.com...
> >
> > Soounds more like rationalization than explanation.
> >
> > I agree though that they were looking for change. The Microsoft =
people
> > who went to Google were looking for a change, from a stagnant =
company
> > whose best years have passed by; to a vibrant, growing company =
that's
> > just beginning.
> >
> > /m
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:18:21 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> >
> > > Interest in google is easy to explain. For people looking =
for a change but do not want to uproot themselves and move there are few = high
tech businesses in the area particularly those that treat there = employees as
well as Microsoft does. In the past people have might have = gone to amazon or
real or other local outfits. During the boom many = went to startups but you
see less of that now that the idea of startups = isn't as popular.
> > >
> > >Rich
> > >
> > > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:v1dka151rpc6lk6pbmo5p2ra8vcjo8mos4@4ax.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Probably due to the stress caued by Microsoft's problems =
hiring of late,
> > > and Google becoming the destination for Microsoft talent. =
Well I guess
> > > that happens when you've trained your workforce to expect to =
be paid by
> > > the stock market.
> > >
> > > /m
------=_NextPart_000_0164_01C56E97.7231F1C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> I have no interest in your =
diversion=20
and change of topic. I stayed with the original topic. Feel = free
to=20
discuss the stock market all you want.</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>
<DIV><BR>Rich</DIV>
<DIV></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Mike '/m'" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:78ima11fj0rkdmigubot7ignm6p6u45q9n@4ax.com">news:78ima11fj0r=
kdmigubot7ignm6p6u45q9n@4ax.com</A>...</DIV><BR>I=20
notice you conveniently avoided answering the question I asked, =
"So,<BR>do you=20
think Microsoft will return to the growth rate of, say, 1990 =
to<BR>2000? <A=20
=
href=3D"http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=3DMSFT&t=3Dmy&l=3Doff&=
;z=3Dl&q=3Dl&c">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=3DMSFT&t=3Dmy=
&l=3Doff&z=3Dl&q=3Dl&c</A>=3D=20
", and<BR>tried to divert the discussion into my alleged =
"agenda". =20
<BR><BR> /m <BR><BR><BR><BR>On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:33:52 =
-0700,=20
"Rich" <@> wrote:<BR><BR>> And people came and =
left back=20
them too. I realize you are trying hard to spin this to meet =
your=20
agenda.<BR>><BR>>Rich<BR>> <BR>> "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:sb3ma1th9d5tlvmjcan7obbbnmk4k5pvd1@4ax.com">news:sb3ma1th9d5=
tlvmjcan7obbbnmk4k5pvd1@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
So, do you think Microsoft will return to the growth rate of, say,=20
1990<BR>> to 2000? <BR>><BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=3DMSFT&t=3Dmy&l=3Doff&=
;z=3Dl&q=3Dl&c">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=3DMSFT&t=3Dmy=
&l=3Doff&z=3Dl&q=3Dl&c</A>=3D<BR>><BR>> =20
That's when it was a vibrant, growing company. That's when the =
use=20
of<BR>> the stock market to compensate employees actually =
worked, and=20
enabled<BR>> Microsoft to attract and retain "the best and =
the=20
brightest".<BR>><BR>> =20
/m<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:49:43 =
-0700,=20
"Rich" <@> wrote:<BR>><BR>> > You =
believe=20
whatever helps you feel better about yourself.<BR>> =20
><BR>> >Rich<BR>> ><BR>> =
> "Mike=20
'/m'" <<A href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:i4lla1lvjl9mcj1pa37j21nqevgnidfr2n@4ax.com">news:i4lla1lvjl9=
mcj1pa37j21nqevgnidfr2n@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
><BR>> > Soounds more like rationalization than=20
explanation.<BR>> ><BR>> > I agree =
though that=20
they were looking for change. The Microsoft people<BR>> =
> who went to Google were looking for a change, from a =
stagnant=20
company<BR>> > whose best years have passed by; to a =
vibrant, growing company that's<BR>> > just=20
beginning.<BR>> ><BR>> > =20
/m<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > On =
Fri, 10=20
Jun 2005 23:18:21 -0700, "Rich" <@> wrote:<BR>> =20
><BR>> > > Interest in google is =
easy to=20
explain. For people looking for a change but do not want to =
uproot=20
themselves and move there are few high tech businesses in the area=20
particularly those that treat there employees as well as Microsoft =
does. =20
In the past people have might have gone to amazon or real or other =
local=20
outfits. During the boom many went to startups but you see less =
of that=20
now that the idea of startups isn't as popular.<BR>> =
> =20
><BR>> > >Rich<BR>> > =20
><BR>> > > "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:v1dka151rpc6lk6pbmo5p2ra8vcjo8mos4@4ax.com">news:v1dka151rpc=
6lk6pbmo5p2ra8vcjo8mos4@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
> ><BR>> > ><BR>> > =
> Probably due to the stress caued by Microsoft's problems =
hiring of=20
late,<BR>> > > and Google becoming the =
destination=20
for Microsoft talent. Well I guess<BR>> > =
> =20
that happens when you've trained your workforce to expect to be paid=20
by<BR>> > > the stock market.<BR>> =
> ><BR>> > > =20
/m<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0164_01C56E97.7231F1C0--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|