Text 5557, 224 rader
Skriven 2005-07-01 13:53:10 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 5556 av Tony Ingenoso (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Productivity
========================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0181_01C57E44.374DAB00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Your off topic question is nothing but an attempt on your part at a =
diversion. Let's remind everyone of your bullshit claim.
"Tony Ingenoso" <admin@spamcop.net> wrote in message =
news:42c34a24@w3.nls.net...
I reject the notion of you placing such constraints on my =
comparason.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42c31ca0@w3.nls.net...
Of software users use for productivity tasks (e.g. not games nor =
likely multimedia) that has gotten slower. Since you mention the 486 I = would
expect the comparison to be between someone that purchased a new = computer and
software in 1989 when the 486 was introduced and someone = that purchases a new
computer and software today.
Rich
"Tony Ingenoso" <admin@spamcop.net> wrote in message =
news:42c3170b@w3.nls.net...
Examples of what?
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42c31595@w3.nls.net...
Can you give real world examples?
Rich
"Tony Ingenoso" <admin@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:42c3121d$1@w3.nls.net...
In terms of real life bankable productivity gains, I'm not =
convinced
anything since about the 486 and Win31 or OS/2 has actually made =
ordinary
users more productive in meaningful ways.
The software has gotten slower about as fast as the hardware has =
gotten
faster ;->
Now try to support your claim or admit it is bullshit.=20
Rich
"Tony Ingenoso" <admin@spamcop.net> wrote in message =
news:42c5a41e$1@w3.nls.net...
How many Win95/98 upgraded did MS sell? A simple question -- directly
related to my claim.
Answer it.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42c58414@w3.nls.net...
Do you really need to point out that no not only refuse to support =
your
claims but that you edit your replies to hide what they are? Are you
prepared to support your claims or should be continue to assume that =
even
you know they are bullshit?
Rich
"Tony Ingenoso" <admin@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:42c5734c$1@w3.nls.net...
The silence is deafening...
"Tony Ingenoso" <admin@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:42c45f2a$1@w3.nls.net...
> Make your own comparasons if you want to use your own constraints.
>
> Q: How many Win95/Win98 upgrades did MS sell?
>
> "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42c353dd$1@w3.nls.net...
> I restored your claim which matches exactly what I suggested =
your
compare
> so that everyone can see you are unwilling to support your own =
claims.
It's
> probably because your claims are bullshit.
>
> Rich
------=_NextPart_000_0181_01C57E44.374DAB00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Your off topic question is =
nothing but=20
an attempt on your part at a diversion. Let's remind everyone of =
your=20
bullshit claim.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" =
color=3D#008000=20
size=3D3>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tony Ingenoso" <<A href=3D"">admin@spamcop.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A href=3D"">news:42c34a24@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>I reject =
the notion=20
of you placing such constraints on my comparason.<BR><BR>"Rich" =
<@>=20
wrote in message <A href=3D"">news:42c31ca0@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Of software =
users use for=20
productivity tasks (e.g. not games nor likely multimedia) that =
has=20
gotten slower. Since you mention the 486 I would expect the =
comparison=20
to be between someone that purchased a new computer and software in =
1989=20
when the 486 was introduced and someone that purchases a new =
computer and=20
software today.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tony Ingenoso" <<A href=3D"">admin@spamcop.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A href=3D"">news:42c3170b@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>Examples =
of=20
what?<BR><BR>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"">news:42c31595@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR> Can you =
give real=20
world examples?<BR><BR>Rich<BR><BR> "Tony Ingenoso" <<A=20
href=3D"">admin@spamcop.net</A>> wrote in message<BR><A=20
href=3D"">news:42c3121d$1@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR> In terms of =
real life=20
bankable productivity gains, I'm not convinced<BR> anything =
since=20
about the 486 and Win31 or OS/2 has actually made =
ordinary<BR> users=20
more productive in meaningful ways.<BR><BR> The software has =
gotten=20
slower about as fast as the hardware has gotten<BR> faster=20
=
;-></FONT><BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Now try to support your claim or admit =
it is=20
bullshit. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tony Ingenoso" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:admin@spamcop.net">admin@spamcop.net</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42c5a41e$1@w3.nls.net">news:42c5a41e$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>How=20
many Win95/98 upgraded did MS sell? A simple question --=20
directly<BR>related to my claim.<BR><BR>Answer it.<BR><BR>"Rich" =
<@>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42c58414@w3.nls.net">news:42c58414@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>&nbs=
p; =20
Do you really need to point out that no not only refuse to support=20
your<BR>claims but that you edit your replies to hide what they =
are? Are=20
you<BR>prepared to support your claims or should be continue to assume =
that=20
even<BR>you know they are bullshit?<BR><BR>Rich<BR><BR> "Tony =
Ingenoso"=20
<<A href=3D"mailto:admin@spamcop.net">admin@spamcop.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:42c5734c$1@w3.nls.net">news:42c5734c$1@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>=
=20
The silence is deafening...<BR><BR> "Tony Ingenoso" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:admin@spamcop.net">admin@spamcop.net</A>> wrote in=20
message<BR> <A=20
=
href=3D"news:42c45f2a$1@w3.nls.net">news:42c45f2a$1@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>=
=20
> Make your own comparasons if you want to use your own=20
constraints.<BR> ><BR> > Q: How many Win95/Win98 =
upgrades=20
did MS sell?<BR> ><BR> > "Rich" <@> wrote in =
message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:42c353dd$1@w3.nls.net">news:42c353dd$1@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR>=
=20
> I restored your claim which matches exactly =
what I=20
suggested your<BR> compare<BR> > so that everyone can =
see you=20
are unwilling to support your own claims.<BR> It's<BR> =
>=20
probably because your claims are bullshit.<BR> ><BR> =
>=20
Rich<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0181_01C57E44.374DAB00--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|