Fidonet echomail

Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English Information Debug

OS2BBS 0/787
OS2DOSBBS 0/580
OS2HW 0/42
OS2INET 0/37
OS2LAN 0/134
OS2PROG 0/36
OS2REXX 0/113
OS2USER-L 207
OS2 0/4786
OSDEBATE 7659/18996
PASCAL 0/490
PERL 0/457
PHP 0/45
POINTS 0/405
POLITICS 0/29554
POL_INC 0/14731
PSION 103
R20_ADMIN 1121
R20_AMATORRADIO 0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET 13
R20_CHAT 0/893
R20_DEPP 0/3
R20_DEV 399
R20_ECHO2 1379
R20_ECHOPRES 0/35
R20_ESTAT 0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT 0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM 0/22
R20_FIDONET 0/248
R20_FILEFIND 0/24
R20_FILEFOUND 0/22
R20_HIFI 0/3
R20_INFO2 3218
R20_INTERNET 0/12940
R20_INTRESSE 0/60
R20_INTR_KOM 0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT 42
R20_KANDIDAT 28
R20_KOM_DEV 112
R20_KONTROLL 0/13270
R20_KORSET 0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK 0/24
R20_MODERATOR 0/1852
R20_NC 76
R20_NET200 245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS 0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX 0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR 0/1
R20_REC2NEC 534
R20_SFOSM 0/340
R20_SF 0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH 0/1
R20_SQUISH 107
R20_TEST 2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET 12
RAR 0/9
RA_MULTI 106
RA_UTIL 0/162
REGCON.EUR 0/2056
REGCON 0/13
SCIENCE 0/1206
SF 0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT 0/5146
SHAREWRE 0/14
SIMPSONS 0/169
STATS_OLD1 0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2 0/2530
STATS_OLD3 0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4 0/1692.25
SURVIVOR 0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER 0/3
SYSOP 0/84
TAGLINES 0/112
TEAMOS2 0/4530
TECH 0/2617
TEST.444 0/105
TRAPDOOR 0/19
TREK 0/755
TUB 0/290
UFO 0/40
UNIX 0/1316
USA_EURLINK 0/102
USR_MODEMS 0/1
VATICAN 0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS 0/14
VIRUS 0/378
VIRUS_INFO 0/201
VISUAL_BASIC 0/473
WHITEHOUSE 0/5187
WIN2000 0/101
WIN32 0/30
WIN95 0/4288
WIN95_OLD1 0/70272
WINDOWS 0/1517
WWB_SYSOP 0/419
WWB_TECH 0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC 0/1
ZEC 4

4DOS 0/134
ABORTION 0/7
ALASKA_CHAT 0/506
ALLFIX_FILE 0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1 0/7997
ALT_DOS 0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO 0/1039
AMIGASALE 0/14
AMIGA 0/331
AMIGA_INT 0/1
AMIGA_PROG 0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP 0/26
ANIME 0/15
ARGUS 0/924
ASCII_ART 0/340
ASIAN_LINK 0/651
ASTRONOMY 0/417
AUDIO 0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING 0/105
BABYLON5 0/17862
BAG 135
BATPOWER 0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH 0/382
BBSLAW 0/109
BBS_ADS 0/5290
BBS_INTERNET 0/507
BIBLE 0/3563
BINKD 0/1119
BINKLEY 0/215
BLUEWAVE 0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS 0/25
CBM 0/46
CDRECORD 0/66
CDROM 0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER 0/378
COMICS 0/15
CONSPRCY 0/899
COOKING 32896
COOKING_OLD1 0/24719
COOKING_OLD2 0/40862
COOKING_OLD3 0/37489
COOKING_OLD4 0/35496
COOKING_OLD5 9370
C_ECHO 0/189
C_PLUSPLUS 0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN 0/201
DOORGAMES 0/2056
DOS_INTERNET 0/196
duplikat 6002
ECHOLIST 0/18295
EC_SUPPORT 0/318
ELECTRONICS 0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER 1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC 0/13
ENET.POLITICS 0/4
ENET.SOFT 0/11701
ENET.SYSOP 33903
ENET.TALKS 0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR 0/2000
EVOLUTION 0/1335
FDECHO 0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE 0/7068
FIDONEWS 24126
FIDONEWS_OLD1 0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2 0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3 0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4 0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP 12852
FIDO_UTIL 0/180
FILEFIND 0/209
FILEGATE 0/212
FILM 0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH 4408
FN_SYSOP 41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1 71952
FTP_FIDO 0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC 0/13599
FUNNY 0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR 0/71
GET_INFO 105
GOLDED 0/408
HAM 0/16070
HOLYSMOKE 0/6791
HOT_SITES 0/1
HTMLEDIT 0/71
HUB203 466
HUB_100 264
HUB_400 39
HUMOR 0/29
IC 0/2851
INTERNET 0/424
INTERUSER 0/3
IP_CONNECT 719
JAMNNTPD 0/233
JAMTLAND 0/47
KATTY_KORNER 0/41
LAN 0/16
LINUX-USER 0/19
LINUXHELP 0/1155
LINUX 0/22092
LINUX_BBS 0/957
mail 18.68
mail_fore_ok 249
MENSA 0/341
MODERATOR 0/102
MONTE 0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA 0/1245
MUFFIN 0/783
MUSIC 0/321
N203_STAT 926
N203_SYSCHAT 313
NET203 321
NET204 69
NET_DEV 0/10
NORD.ADMIN 0/101
NORD.CHAT 0/2572
NORD.FIDONET 189
NORD.HARDWARE 0/28
NORD.KULTUR 0/114
NORD.PROG 0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE 0/88
NORD.TEKNIK 0/58
NORD 0/453
OCCULT_CHAT 0/93

Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter

Text 5766, 93 rader
Skriven 2005-07-08 06:13:32 av Geo (1:379/45)
   Kommentar till text 5762 av Rich (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Productivity
========================
From: "Geo" <georger@nls.net>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0078_01C58384.2AE32C60
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The reason most people don't see an advantage to going to a faster CPU = today
is because the cpu isn't the bottleneck. Start selling 120GB solid = state
drives and that will change in a hurry.

Geo.
  "Rich" <@> wrote in message news:42ce3d79@w3.nls.net...
     I think you may be mixing two related areas.  I don't believe =
people value time linearly.  The difference between one second and two = second
response times can be very noticable and have a significant = affect on the
user's perception and satisfaction.  In my earlier example = I had the user
than take 60 seconds on consuming the results before = repeating the operation.
 At that level the difference is 61 seconds vs. = 62 seconds.  It may be a
valid business decision that 61 seconds is not = worth much more in cost than
62 seconds.  The user of the faster system = though may have measurably higher
satisfaction.  Many users, = particularly for personal use, may value
satisfaction more highly than = you or maybe your satisfaction is high enough. 
My point is that this = satisfaction from responsiveness is distinct from the
time (limited or = not) spent on a task.  I believe this is one reason people
desire and = enjoy ever faster computers.

  Rich


------=_NextPart_000_0078_01C58384.2AE32C60
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1505" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The reason most people don't see an =
advantage to=20
going to a faster CPU today is because the cpu isn't the bottleneck. = Start=20
selling 120GB solid state drives and that will change in a =
hurry.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Rich" &lt;@&gt; wrote in message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:42ce3d79@w3.nls.net">news:42ce3d79@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; I think you may be =
mixing two=20
  related areas.&nbsp; I don't believe people value time linearly.&nbsp; =
The=20
  difference between one second and two second response times can be =
very=20
  noticable and have a significant affect on the user's perception and=20
  satisfaction.&nbsp; In my earlier example I had the user than take 60 =
seconds=20
  on consuming the results before repeating the operation.&nbsp; At that =
level=20
  the difference is 61 seconds vs. 62 seconds.&nbsp; It may be a valid =
business=20
  decision that 61 seconds is not worth much more in cost than 62 =
seconds.&nbsp;=20
  The user of the faster system though may have measurably higher=20
  satisfaction.&nbsp; Many users, particularly for personal use, may =
value=20
  satisfaction more highly than you or maybe your satisfaction is high=20
  enough.&nbsp; My point is that this satisfaction from responsiveness =
is=20
  distinct from the time (limited or not) spent on a task.&nbsp; I =
believe this=20
  is one reason people desire and enjoy ever faster =
computers.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0078_01C58384.2AE32C60--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)