Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4786
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1121
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT   0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   3207
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13260
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS   0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX   0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2056
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4288
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   32712
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2053
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6002
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33888
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   24100
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12852
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4393
FN_SYSOP   41678
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13599
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16069
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22090
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   926
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
Möte OSDEBATE, 18996 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa 
Text 653, 152 rader
Skriven 2004-09-19 11:20:54 av Rich (1:379/45)
    Kommentar till text 646 av Don Hills (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Spammers faster than the good guys....
==================================================
From: "Rich" <@>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01D0_01C49E3A.BAFAB1E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Again, you give up no rights.  You can keep trying to claim otherwise =
but it would still be false.  Even your claims regarding other people's = legal
interpretation are suspect.  I've seen several of these complaint = and the
complaints are not that any rights are given up but that they = are complaining
that they should be entitled to even more royalty free = rights.  Pity for
them.

   You did say you did not need to.  You claimed that you are not a =
lawyer and not competent to discuss the document hence your lack of need = to
even read it first.

Rich

  "Don Hills" <dmhills@attglobal.net> wrote in message =
news:G6TTBtgaX+nb092yn@attglobal.net...
  In article <414d0f0e$1@w3.nls.net>, "Rich" <@> wrote:
  >   We are discussing a document that grants rights to the licensee =
that
  >are otherwise not granted.  It takes no rights away.  Exactly the =
same
  >model of the gpl and many other licenses.

  In the sense that if you agree to the license you can use the code, as
  distinct from not being able to use the code if you don't agree to the
  license terms. The trouble is that if you do agree to the license you =
are
  constrained from other courses of action. These constraints have been =
well
  documented by experts.

  >   Now with that out of the way, if you want legal advice you should
  >always ask a lawyer.  If you want to have an intellectual discussion,
  >you just need an intellect.  Maybe this explains your refusal to even
  >read the document about which you are making claims.

  Now the insult card is played.
  Why should I bark when I have a dog?

  >   I didn't meant to imply you are untrustworthy, only that anything =
you
  >post on legal topics is untrustworthy, by your own claims.

  I have no argument with that.

  > You claim you are not competent enough to even read or understand a =
very
  >simple document.

  You're welcome to try and quote where I made that second claim. You'll =
find
  that I said that I didn't need to, not that I wasn't competent to.

  --=20
  Don Hills
------=_NextPart_000_01D0_01C49E3A.BAFAB1E0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.186" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; Again, you give up no =
rights.&nbsp;=20
You can keep trying to claim otherwise but it would still be = false.&nbsp;
Even=20
your claims regarding other people's legal interpretation are =
suspect.&nbsp;=20
I've seen several of these complaint and the complaints are not that any =
rights=20
are given up but that they are complaining that they should be entitled = to
even=20
more royalty free rights.&nbsp; Pity for them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; You did say you did not =
need to.&nbsp;=20
You claimed that you are not a lawyer and not competent to discuss the =
document=20
hence your lack of need to even read it first.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Don Hills" &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:dmhills@attglobal.net">dmhills@attglobal.net</A>&gt; =
wrote in=20
  message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:G6TTBtgaX+nb092yn@attglobal.net">news:G6TTBtgaX+nb092yn@attg=
lobal.net</A>...</DIV>In=20
  article &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:414d0f0e$1@w3.nls.net">414d0f0e$1@w3.nls.net</A>&gt;, =
"Rich"=20
  &lt;@&gt; wrote:<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; We are discussing a document that =
grants=20
  rights to the licensee that<BR>&gt;are otherwise not granted.&nbsp; It =
takes=20
  no rights away.&nbsp; Exactly the same<BR>&gt;model of the gpl and =
many other=20
  licenses.<BR><BR>In the sense that if you agree to the license you can =
use the=20
  code, as<BR>distinct from not being able to use the code if you don't =
agree to=20
  the<BR>license terms. The trouble is that if you do agree to the =
license you=20
  are<BR>constrained from other courses of action. These constraints =
have been=20
  well<BR>documented by experts.<BR><BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; Now with that =
out of=20
  the way, if you want legal advice you should<BR>&gt;always ask a =
lawyer.&nbsp;=20
  If you want to have an intellectual discussion,<BR>&gt;you just need =
an=20
  intellect.&nbsp; Maybe this explains your refusal to even<BR>&gt;read =
the=20
  document about which you are making claims.<BR><BR>Now the insult card =
is=20
  played.<BR>Why should I bark when I have a =
dog?<BR><BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp; I=20
  didn't meant to imply you are untrustworthy, only that anything=20
  you<BR>&gt;post on legal topics is untrustworthy, by your own =
claims.<BR><BR>I=20
  have no argument with that.<BR><BR>&gt; You claim you are not =
competent enough=20
  to even read or understand a very<BR>&gt;simple =
document.<BR><BR>You're=20
  welcome to try and quote where I made that second claim. You'll =
find<BR>that I=20
  said that I didn't need to, not that I wasn't competent to.<BR><BR>-- =
<BR>Don=20
  Hills&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_01D0_01C49E3A.BAFAB1E0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)