Text 6828, 389 rader
Skriven 2005-08-28 19:15:38 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 6813 av Geo (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: TPM
===============
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C5AC04.E00ECC40
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Brilliant. Intel is building DRM into the pentium by adding what, =
DRM! Wow! Can you be any more vague or any more paranoid?
For someone who believes his manufactured claims are irrelevant, you =
sure spend a lot of energy going on about how everyone is out to get you = and
you are entitled to steal whatever you want.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message news:43122ded@w3.nls.net...
Only in response to your use of the term TPM, you won't find me using =
"TPM" in any of my previous posts concerning DRM which is what you were =
commenting about with your "Neither is what george likes to call DRM." =
statement.
"It" referrs to DRM. In the case of the CPU that's probably a function =
that requires that any cards or devices you connect to the computer = comply
with the CCI and AKE requirements before being allowed access to = any
protected content. I don't really know what they have tucked into = the CPU, I
just know they are doing the "no unannounced drm" dance = instead of stating
clearly that it doesn't contain ANY NEW drm that = wasn't in previous Pentiums.
Personally I think the whole thing is stupid, DRM isn't going to stop =
the media underground, it's going to accelerate it, all DRM is going to = do is
prove useful to create more restrictive licensing terms for = software,
something that is really going to get under my skin and quite = honestly is
going to result in MS losing it's position as king of the = hill. I really
don't want to see that happen, I like MS products.
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:43120917@w3.nls.net...
You wrote
Initially the idea that the TCPA had was to add a TPM chip, since =
then they
have decided to integrate it directly into the CPU. Pentium D is =
the first
of these CPUs.
What do you mean by "it"? If you don't mean the TPM then what =
exactly is "it" that is being integrated into the Pentium D? Honestly, = I
think you have no clue and you are repeating garbage others have told = you.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:4311ff56@w3.nls.net...
I didn't say TPM's are built into the Pentium D as I NEVER EVEN =
USE THE TERM "TPM", I said it contains DRM. Stop being such an ass.
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:4311f9f3@w3.nls.net...
Your bogus claims regarding DRM were in regard to TPMs. You =
are wrong that TPMs are built in to the Pentium D. Again, your = spreading
misinformation makes you look like an idiot. You should read = up only this
from from honest credible sources.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:4311e782@w3.nls.net...
I'm only trying to comment on what you are claiming about ME =
with your "what George likes to call DRM" comment. If anyone here is = guilty
of spreading misinformation, it's you, I'm correcting that = misinformation..
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message news:4311df6d$1@w3.nls.net...
I'm neither talking up or talking down TPMs. Your =
spreading misinformation or making claims based on misinformation isn't = going
to help you make a point. It just makes you look like an idiot.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:4311ddfb@w3.nls.net...
You are the one talking up TPM, i'm talking about your =
comment quoted for your convenience below, on my view of DRM which is = what
I'm saying the CPU now contains. I could care less to get limited = in scope to
only TPM as that could be something as simple as encryption = or a watermark.
Geo.
"Rich" <@> wrote in message =
news:4311d082$1@w3.nls.net...
The TPM is not in the CPU. You need honest and =
accurate sources of info. Neither link you give is.
Rich
"Geo" <georger@nls.net> wrote in message =
news:4311b913@w3.nls.net...
"Robert Comer" <bobcomer@mindspring.com> wrote in =
message
news:4310dbd2@w3.nls.net...
> VT is virtualization. LT is security. =
Neither is what george
likes
> to
> call DRM.
Initially the idea that the TCPA had was to add a TPM =
chip, since then they
have decided to integrate it directly into the CPU. =
Pentium D is the first
of these CPUs.
Here's the problem:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq-0.2.html
and
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html
Rich can spin it any way he likes but anyone who reads =
either of those
articles above will have a pretty clear understanding =
of my issues with it.
Geo.
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C5AC04.E00ECC40
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Brilliant. Intel is =
building DRM=20
into the pentium by adding what, DRM! Wow! Can you be any = more
vague=20
or any more paranoid?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> For someone who believes =
his=20
manufactured claims are irrelevant, you sure spend a lot of energy going =
on=20
about how everyone is out to get you and you are entitled to steal = whatever
you=20
want.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:43122ded@w3.nls.net">news:43122ded@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Only in response to your use of the =
term TPM, you=20
won't find me using "TPM" in any of my previous posts concerning DRM =
which is=20
what you were commenting about with your "<FONT size=3D3>Neither is =
what george=20
likes to call DRM." statement.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT =
size=3D3></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT size=3D3>"It" referrs to DRM. =
In the case of=20
the CPU that's probably a function that requires that any cards or =
devices you=20
connect to the computer comply with the CCI and AKE requirements =
before being=20
allowed access to any protected content. I don't really know what they =
have=20
tucked into the CPU, I just know they are doing the "no unannounced =
drm" dance=20
instead of stating clearly that it doesn't contain ANY NEW drm that =
wasn't in=20
previous Pentiums.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Personally I think the whole thing is stupid, =
DRM isn't=20
going to stop the media underground, it's going to accelerate it, all =
DRM is=20
going to do is prove useful to create more restrictive licensing terms =
for=20
software, something that is really going to get under my skin and =
quite=20
honestly is going to result in MS losing it's position as king of the =
hill. I=20
really don't want to see that happen, I like MS products.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT size=3D3>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:43120917@w3.nls.net">news:43120917@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> You wrote</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT color=3D#008000>Initially the idea that the TCPA had =
was to add a=20
TPM chip, since then they<BR>have decided to integrate it directly =
into=20
the CPU. Pentium D is the first<BR>of these =
CPUs.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What do you mean by "it"? If =
you don't=20
mean the TPM then what exactly is "it" that is being integrated into =
the=20
Pentium D? Honestly, I think you have no clue and you are =
repeating=20
garbage others have told you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311ff56@w3.nls.net">news:4311ff56@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I didn't say TPM's are built into =
the Pentium=20
D as I NEVER EVEN USE THE TERM "TPM", I said it contains DRM. Stop =
being=20
such an ass.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311f9f3@w3.nls.net">news:4311f9f3@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Your bogus claims =
regarding=20
DRM were in regard to TPMs. You are wrong that TPMs are =
built in=20
to the Pentium D. Again, your =
spreading misinformation makes=20
you look like an idiot. You should read up only this from =
from=20
honest credible sources.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311e782@w3.nls.net">news:4311e782@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm only trying to comment on =
what you=20
are claiming about ME with your "what George likes to call =
DRM"=20
comment. If anyone here is guilty of spreading misinformation, =
it's=20
you, I'm correcting that misinformation..</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311df6d$1@w3.nls.net">news:4311df6d$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> I'm neither =
talking up or=20
talking down TPMs. Your spreading misinformation or =
making=20
claims based on misinformation isn't going to help you make =
a=20
point. It just makes you look like an =
idiot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311ddfb@w3.nls.net">news:4311ddfb@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>You are the one talking =
up TPM, i'm=20
talking about your comment quoted for your =
convenience=20
below, on my view of DRM which is what I'm saying the CPU =
now=20
contains. I could care less to get limited in scope to =
only TPM as=20
that could be something as simple as encryption or a=20
watermark.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Geo.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Rich" <@> wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311d082$1@w3.nls.net">news:4311d082$1@w3.nls.net</A>...</DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> The TPM is =
not in the=20
CPU. You need honest and accurate sources of =
info. =20
Neither link you give is.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Geo" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:georger@nls.net">georger@nls.net</A>> wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4311b913@w3.nls.net">news:4311b913@w3.nls.net</A>...</DIV>"R=
obert=20
Comer" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:bobcomer@mindspring.com">bobcomer@mindspring.com</A>>=20
wrote in message<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:4310dbd2@w3.nls.net">news:4310dbd2@w3.nls.net</A>...<BR><BR>=
> =20
VT is virtualization. LT is security. =
Neither is=20
what george<BR>likes<BR>>=20
to<BR>> call =
DRM.<BR><BR>Initially=20
the idea that the TCPA had was to add a TPM chip, =
since then=20
they<BR>have decided to integrate it directly into the =
CPU.=20
Pentium D is the first<BR>of these CPUs.<BR><BR>Here's =
the=20
problem:<BR><BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq-0.2.html">http://www.cl.c=
am.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq-0.2.html</A><BR><BR>and<BR><BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html">http://www.gnu.=
org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html</A><BR><BR>Rich=20
can spin it any way he likes but anyone who reads =
either of=20
those<BR>articles above will have a pretty clear =
understanding=20
of my issues with=20
=
it.<BR><BR>Geo.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOT=
E></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY=
></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C5AC04.E00ECC40--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|