Text 8144, 211 rader
Skriven 2005-11-08 16:20:58 av Rich (1:379/45)
Kommentar till text 8143 av Mike '/m' (1:379/45)
Ärende: Re: Windows Vista video enhancements
============================================
From: "Rich" <@>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C5E480.66C94360
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If you haven't noticed it is quite common of you to quote disparaging =
articles. It appears you think that it absolves you of responsibility = if you
are just repeating someone else instead of expressing yourself = and defending
your position. Cowardice.
The Microsoft reference was accurate and off topic. Your attempt at =
a diversion was not unexpected.
Rich
"Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:s9f2n1ppstscjt9iipcv4cpeuuq7k3ohsd@4ax.com...
No matter how hard you try to spin otherwise, I am not claiming
anything. Just citing what is in the media. Hey, I even quoted
Microsoft's own site to show what the correct information is. We all
know that Microsoft's site never contains incorrect information, =
right?=20
Perhaps you should vent your concern towards Microsoft PR people, who
obviously are unable to get correct information out to the media.
You should thank me for bringing this to your attention.
/m
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:03:23 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
> I only know because you have twice made the claim in an attempt to =
justify your own bad behavior.
>
> Funny how you use the term "discerning" to mean "inaccurate". =
Interesting spin.
>
>Rich
>
> "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:kb92n1p1vb4ljdosjho36rldropv43nl30@4ax.com...
>
> Have you noticed that Barron's is writing the same incorrect
> information? Can't Microsoft get valid information out to the =
media
> anymore? Geesh, I remember the days of the PCWeek hegemony where
> Microsoft's PR people used to FAX tasty predigested articles to
> reporters struggling to meet a deadline.
>
> Nowadays it appears the reporters are becoming a bit more =
discerning.
>
> /m
>
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:17:40 -0800, "Rich" <@> wrote:
>
> > Ah, the old "I'm not responsible. I was just doing what I was =
ordered." defense.
> >
> >Rich
> >
> > "Mike '/m'" <mike@barkto.com> wrote in message =
news:pakvm1t3458uvb3be5m2cil8vhp8upevgm@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:26:54 -0500, "Robert Comer"
> > <bobcomer@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> Windows Vista Ready PC Requirements
> > >
> > >That really doesn't support your case -- there's no reason an =
LDDM driver=20
> > >couldn't be written for integrated video, no physical reason to =
limit it to=20
> > >third party cards.
> > >
> > >It is pretty stout to run on older hardware, even without LDDM, =
but it still=20
> > >runs. (you don't get Glass, but it runs.)
> >
> > It's not my case, I was just posting what someone else said. =
And I
> > posted what Microsoft said on their site.
> >
> > /m
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C5E480.66C94360
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> If you haven't noticed it =
is quite=20
common of you to quote disparaging articles. It appears you think = that
it=20
absolves you of responsibility if you are just repeating someone else = instead
of=20
expressing yourself and defending your position. =
Cowardice.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> The Microsoft reference =
was=20
accurate and off topic. Your attempt at a diversion was not=20
unexpected.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rich</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Mike '/m'" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:s9f2n1ppstscjt9iipcv4cpeuuq7k3ohsd@4ax.com">news:s9f2n1ppsts=
cjt9iipcv4cpeuuq7k3ohsd@4ax.com</A>...</DIV>No=20
matter how hard you try to spin otherwise, I am not=20
claiming<BR>anything. Just citing what is in the media. =
Hey, I=20
even quoted<BR>Microsoft's own site to show what the correct =
information=20
is. We all<BR>know that Microsoft's site never contains =
incorrect=20
information, right? <BR>Perhaps you should vent your concern towards =
Microsoft=20
PR people, who<BR>obviously are unable to get correct information out =
to the=20
media.<BR><BR>You should thank me for bringing this to your=20
attention.<BR><BR> /m<BR><BR><BR>On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:03:23 =
-0800,=20
"Rich" <@> wrote:<BR><BR>> I only know because =
you have=20
twice made the claim in an attempt to justify your own bad=20
behavior.<BR>><BR>> Funny how you use the term =
"discerning"=20
to mean "inaccurate". Interesting=20
spin.<BR>><BR>>Rich<BR>><BR>> "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:kb92n1p1vb4ljdosjho36rldropv43nl30@4ax.com">news:kb92n1p1vb4=
ljdosjho36rldropv43nl30@4ax.com</A>...<BR>><BR>> =20
Have you noticed that Barron's is writing the same =
incorrect<BR>> =20
information? Can't Microsoft get valid information out to =
the=20
media<BR>> anymore? Geesh, I remember the days of the =
PCWeek=20
hegemony where<BR>> Microsoft's PR people used to FAX tasty=20
predigested articles to<BR>> reporters struggling to meet a=20
deadline.<BR>><BR>> Nowadays it appears the reporters are =
becoming=20
a bit more discerning.<BR>><BR>> =20
/m<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:17:40 =
-0800,=20
"Rich" <@> wrote:<BR>><BR>> > Ah, the =
old=20
"I'm not responsible. I was just doing what I was ordered."=20
defense.<BR>> ><BR>> >Rich<BR>> =20
><BR>> > "Mike '/m'" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:mike@barkto.com">mike@barkto.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:pakvm1t3458uvb3be5m2cil8vhp8upevgm@4ax.com">news:pakvm1t3458=
uvb3be5m2cil8vhp8upevgm@4ax.com</A>...<BR>> =20
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:26:54 -0500, "Robert =
Comer"<BR>> =20
> <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:bobcomer@mindspring.com">bobcomer@mindspring.com</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> > >> Windows =
Vista=20
Ready PC Requirements<BR>> > ><BR>> =
> =20
>That really doesn't support your case -- there's no reason an LDDM =
driver=20
<BR>> > >couldn't be written for integrated =
video, no=20
physical reason to limit it to <BR>> > >third =
party=20
cards.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >It =
is pretty=20
stout to run on older hardware, even without LDDM, but it still =
<BR>> =20
> >runs. (you don't get Glass, but it runs.)<BR>> =
><BR>> > It's not my case, I was just posting =
what=20
someone else said. And I<BR>> > posted what =
Microsoft=20
said on their site.<BR>> ><BR>> > =20
/m</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C5E480.66C94360--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
|