Text 10103, 192 rader
Skriven 2005-03-20 22:55:54 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Howie Coombe
Ärende: HAVE YOU SEEN CATCH 22 OR
=================================
Howie Coombe -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 HC> Dear Ed, in regards to this message to Me.

 >>>>>> you contribute so little to this echo,

 HC>>>>> IYO?.

 >>>> In most everyone's opinion.

 HC>>> I am willing to bet there is at least 1 person here other then me
 HC> who

 >> I can tell.


 HC> This is good toread.

Huh?

 >> You don't care about the quality,


 HC> I Care plenty about the quality of my output, and the quality of my and
 HC> other peoples politics and output.

It certainly doesn't show in your indecypherable commentary.

 >> either.


 HC> IYO.

Huh?

 >>>>>> why not just deselect it?

 HC>>>>> Because i think i contribute plenty to this echo, maybe not in

 >>>> No,

 HC>>> No?.

 >> No.


 HC> Aha.

Aha, what?

 >> It's a rather simple 2 letter word.


 HC> Yes it is, it is also a word that should never enter a good debate.

Oh? So far you haven't offered any "good debate."

 >> Easy to understand.


 HC> Yes it is, it is also a debate killer.

Not in the least. Do try to educate yourself about debate.

 >>>> the echo is about *POLITICS*,

 HC>>> And this thread and or converstation is about?.

 >>  Well,


 HC> Yes?.

Why do you insist on editing the comments of others and changing the meaning of
what they say?

 >> this particular conversation is about your inability to follow a thread.


 HC> Which has got what to do with politics.

You aren't the moderator of this echo, so you shouldn't be the least worried
about what it has to do with politics.

 >>>> that's why it's called the FIDO POLITICS echo.

 HC>>> No Kidding, and this thread and or conversation is about?.

 >>  The original thread has expanded beyond just your narrow subject line.


 HC> As all good threads should.

Oh for crying out loud. Do you have a clue?

 >> If you can't keep up,


 HC> Yes?.

Yes, if you can't keep up, don't post. Simple!

 >> don't blame me.


 HC> I am not.

Riiiight. Then, what *IS* your point?

 >>>> Gary Braswell is the *moderator* of this echo.

 HC>>> Yes i know this.

 >> Then,


 HC> Yes?.

Stop that.

 >> let him do his job and don't presume to own a subject line.


 HC> I have never stopped him doing anything and i never will, i am not
 HC> presuming to own anything i am however entering public threads that i
 HC> have a right to enter and will continue to enter until He tells me to do
 HC> otherwise.

Then try at least to educate yourself as to what the thread is about! Just
jumping in with both feet without having clue one only shows how ill-prepared
you are.

 >>>> Not the subject.

 HC>>> Of this echo maybe, but he did seem to be the subject of both this

 >> Really?


 HC> Yes?.

Huh?

 >> Where'd you get that idea?


 HC> My interpretation of what you and Vern were saying, not that i have not
 HC> been known to misinterpret things, but i never do it on porpose.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

You are *WAY* out of your league!

 >>>>>> Good grief!

 HC>>>>> RBAY.

 >>>>  Before you comment anymore,

 HC>>> Yes?.

 >>>> please educate yourself about the subject of this discussion.

 HC>>> I Am sure you will be doing enough "educating" for both of us in the

 >>  I'm not the one who brought you into this conversation.


 HC> No you are not, but you are the one who insisted on keeping me in same.

Not at all. I can never keep you in any conversation. You enter and exit at
your own choice.

Why is it that you leftists think that others control what you do?

 >> You presumed to have something to say to me.


 HC> Er no, i said something, via you, there is a difference.

Huh? Please try to make sense.

 >> I have yet to read anything from you that makes sense.


 HC> And yet you keep replying?.

Ok, I'll ignore you from now on.

Ed

--- Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)