Text 10592, 87 rader
Skriven 2005-03-29 15:56:17 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
  Kommentar till text 10588 av Max Kohn (1:18/200)
Ärende: Re: Bo Gritz
====================
29 Mar 05 14:06, Max Kohn wrote to John Hull:

 MK> *** Quoting John Hull from a message to Max Kohn ***

 JH>> > Prove to you?  I don't have to prove anything.  Michael has been 
 JH>> > trying to pull the tube for years.  If he had been able to, she 
 JH>> > would be dead.  You say if he had done this or that.  Well, IF 
 JH>> > wishes were horses, I'd have a stable full.  Big deal.  That 
 JH>> > wasn't my point.  So get off your high horse.

 MK>> What is your motivation for wanting her dead?  Are you related to 
 MK>> Michael?

 MK> Michael has done NOTHING to try to help Terri recover. ABSOLUTELY 
 MK> NOTHING. That tells me that he's wanted her dead from the start.  You 
 MK> advocate that Michael is right.  Prove it. 

 JH>> What gives you the idea that I want her dead?  I certainly have 
 JH>> never said that.  I'm simply stating a known fact.  Can't deal 
 JH>> with facts or what?

 MK> I can deal with facts but you can't.  Michael has done NOTHING to 
 MK> see if her live can be saved and if she can recover. NOT A DAMN THING.  
 MK> Not an MRI, not physical therapy, NOTHING.  That proves to me he wants her

 MK> dead, pure and simple.  Prove otherwise. 

OH, I get it.  You're right and I'm wrong.  My opinion means nothing while
yours is the real magilla.  Have it your way, sport.

 MK>> All he wants is the life insurance money and whatever is left of 
 MK>> the malpractice suit money.  He doesn't give a damn about Terri 
 MK>> regardless of what he says.  You don't have a valid point.  Wanna 
 MK>> try again?

 JH>> I love the way everybody is so damn sure what he wants, or what 
 JH>> Terri wanted, or what the parents want.  I'm trying to figure out 
 JH>> what is actually going on, anddoing my best to keep emotion out of 
 JH>> it because all that does is cloud things even more.  Seems to me 
 JH>> that I'm one of the few people here who is trying to look at just 
 JH>> the facts.  What I like or don't like has no bearing on anything, 
 JH>> and certainly isn't going to change the law in Florida, or change 
 JH>> what is playing out as we speak.  So, don't sit there and tell me 
 JH>> I don't have a point, because if you've been paying attention you 
 JH>> would know that I'm only trying to ascertain what the facts are.

 MK> Ok, and exactly what are you using to ascertain the facts? You 
 MK> have the same information I do...the media.  Do you have access to 
 MK> Terri's medical file? Have you talked to her doctors?  Have you talked to 
 MK> her parents or her half-assed husband?  There are no facts to look at 
 MK> besides what the media gives us.  So you tell me what facts you are 
 MK> trying to ascertain and what means you are using to do so. 

MOST of the media is full of shit, on both sides.  There are fifty different
versions of the "truth" floating around, each one slightly different than the
one before.  I can eliminate most of the crap just by looking at who is
reporting.  The rest are still all over the map.  I haven't gotten to the
bottom of things yet because nobody has gotten to the bottom of things yet.  

 JH>> My personal preferences re: pulling the plug have no bearing on 
 JH>> this or any other case, and beyond being against judges who 
 JH>> interfere in cases where they have no business going (which may 
 JH>> effect MY ability to make a decision in the future) I have no dog 
 JH>> in this fight.

 MK> Now you're lying.  In a previous post, you've repeatedly said that 
 MK> anyone put in a useless body would rather be dead. You've advocated her 
 MK> death repeatedly. Don't give me this "I have no dog in this fight". Now 
 MK> you're backpedalling. Look at the previous messages I just replied to and 
 MK> tell me that again with a straight face.  You'd make a great politician.

Don't presume to tell me what I meant, because you won't get it right.  I
haven't advocated anybody's death.  What I *have* advocated is what *I* would
do.  I have also said I don't understand why, nor do I believe, that anybody
would *want* to live in a non-responsive body.  That is far different from
saying nobody wants to live that way.  What I believe is just my opinion, no
more and no less, so don't try to put words in MY mouth to justify YOUR
position or lack of one.  I would not try to force my own will or opinion on
anybody else, unlike some of the people here.  

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin:  (1:379/1.99)