Text 10692, 85 rader
Skriven 2005-03-31 00:15:18 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
  Kommentar till text 10643 av Ed Connell (1:379/1.6)
Ärende: GASOLENE PRICES ???
===========================
Ed Connell -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 EC> Hey, Ed.

 EH>> Ed Connell -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 EC>>> Hey, Ed.

 EH>>>> John Hull -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 JH>>>>> * Originally by: Al Jacobs (1:396/17), 27 Mar 05 00:06.

 JH>>>>> 27 Mar 05 00:06, Al Jacobs wrote to Ed Hulett:

 AJ>>>>>> Hello Ed Hulett,

 EH>>>>>>> All these "scientists" began their "studies" with a conclusion
 EC> and
 EH>>>>>>> made assumptions to back up their conclusions.

 AJ>>>>>> You think?  Is that what you did?  :-)

 EH>>>>>>> There are many scientists who are unconvinced that we humans
 EH>>>>>>> can effect climate change to such a degree within such a short
 EH>>>>>>> time.

 AJ>>>>>> Maybe.  You might be interested to read about other scientists who
 AJ>>>>>> use ionospheric heaters in attempts to modify and control the
 AJ>>>>>> weather. There's also a military strategy which proposes using
 AJ>>>>>> weather as a force multiplier.  It calls for "owning the weather."
 AJ>>>>>> It argues that weather modification is a required capability.  It
 AJ>>>>>> has its skeptics and critics.

 EH>>>>>>> Even your so-called studies have concluded that regardless of
 EH>>>>>>> what we do, temperatures will likely continue to warm worldwide.
 EH>>>>>>> So, either we *can* effect temperature change, or we cannot.
 EH>>>>>>> Which is it?  It can't be both.

 AJ>>>>>> Human activities affect the environment and, in turn, the weather.
 AJ>>>>>> The report speaks about a form of inertia involving the time it
 AJ>>>>>> will take for the ocean waters to reflect changes in human
 AJ>>>>>> activities, once those changes are made.  Did you read it?

 JH>>>>> He might have a leg to stand on if humans had come to this planet
 JH>>>>> from somewhere else.  THEN anything we did would be an external
 JH>>>>> influence on things already here.  But we aren't.  We are as much a
 JH>>>>> part of this environment as an iceberg, or a raincloud, or a
 EC> herd of
 JH>>>>> bison, and so is what we do.

 EH>>>> The environmentalists always make the mistake of thinking human
 EH>>>> activities are alien to the environment. They can't blame all the
 EH>>>> ills of the world on man without having that attitude.

 EC>>> I run a picture of the day page on my web site, and lately I've been
 EC>>> running a sequence of sad Kerry supporters.  My view is that I want
 EC>>> them to express their ideas, and give them as much exposure as
 EC>>> possible.  Right now I have one from some folks from Texas telling
 EC> how
 EC>>> ashamed they are of Bush.  At the top of their nice picture it says
 EC>>> 'Texas, "Where every prospect pleases And only Man is vile."'  <g>
 EC>>> Near the bottom they say "America - land of the superstitious fool."

 EC>>> As I say, I like to give them all the publicity I can.

 EC>>> Yesterday's picture showed a guy from San Francisco begging the world
 EC>>> not to hate us.  Behind him was a photo of Mao.  Kerry would be
 EC>>> pleased, I'm sure. <g>

 EC>>> Still to go is one from an idiotic German saying, "apology accepted -
 EC>>> I won't bomb you."  And then there's an old couple saying, "It's our
 EC>>> contry (sic) too, and we're fighting for it!"

 EC>>> You couldn't make this stuff up. <g>

 EH>> I've read a couple website devoted to this lunacy. It's hilarious some
 EH>> of the nonsense they come up with.

 EC> Yeah, I got these from www.sorryeveryone.com.  I just want to give them
and
 EC> their ideas maximum exposure.

Yep, that's one of the sites. It's pathetic.

Ed

--- Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)