Text 10961, 125 rader
Skriven 2005-04-02 16:11:48 av Alan Hess
Ärende: Terri's legacy
======================
     Terri Schiavo's Legacy

The end may well be more painful for those still living, experts say, which is
why end-of-life directives are crucial.

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, April 1 (HealthDay News) -- Reflections of Terri Schiavo's death are
mirrored in other more, private deaths every day of the year in this country.

Certainly, Schiavo's highly publicized final years, and days, were unusual in
many respects. Not only was her family hopelessly divided over her care and
future, but her condition -- irreversible brain damage caused by a heart attack
15 years ago thought to have been triggered by an eating disorder -- is not
common.

Still, there are lessons to be learned from her ordeal, which ended Thursday
morning with her death at a Pinellas Park, Fla., hospice, experts said.

For one thing, losing the desire to eat and drink is often a natural part of
dying and does not involve suffering, they said. Although Schiavo did not make
the decision to remove the feeding tube that was keeping her technically alive,
experts said her death, 13 days after the tube was removed by court order, was
not the gruesome one so often depicted in the media.

"It's not horrible," said Dr. Lyla Correoso, medical director of the visiting
nurse service of the New York Hospice Program in New York City. "When a person
enters into that state, they actually start to release certain substances
similar to endorphins, and it gives an anesthetic-type effect so they don't
experience discomfort."

"It's very natural that patients at the end of life choose to stop eating and
drinking," added Carolyn Cassin, CEO of Continuum Hospice Care in New York
City. "It happens in almost every case. The patient begins to relax, doesn't
feel hunger, doesn't feel thirst and dies a very, very peaceful death."

It's those still living who suffer more as a patient's food is denied, the
hospice experts said.

"As a society, food is our life. That's how we care for people and nurture
them," Correseo said. "That's why it's so distressing for this [the
Schiavo/Schindler] family and for this entire country. Essentially, we've taken
away that nurturing."

Without this activity of caring, family members are at a loss, she added.

Nobody knows how often a feeding tube is removed to aid a person's death in the
United States, but Correoso estimates that it happens up to 30 percent of the
time. Frequently, this is done with the patient's consent -- either on the spot
or through an advanced directive, such as a Living Will.

"In our hospice, this situation happens every day where someone is unable to
speak for themselves, but they have given the right to make decisions about
their care to someone else," Cassin said.

That seemingly simple issue of advance planning -- such as a Living Will or DNR
(do not resuscitate) order -- may be the most important lesson the Schiavo
drama taught us.

"The take-home lesson is to talk about wishes with loved one and have an
advanced directive," stressed Dr. Joseph J. Fins, chief of the division of
medical ethics and professor of medicine at New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell
Medical Center in New York City. "That is more than just filling out a form.
It's having a conversation."

"It's still the case that most people don't have things written down," added
Stephen Connor, vice president for access to end-of-life care, research and
international programs at the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization
in Alexandria, Va.

"It's ironic that a public battle within a family like this has probably done
more to raise awareness of need for advanced directives than most of things
we've done to engage the public in the past five years," he said.

Such a piece of paper, or even witnessed conversations, could go a long way
toward easing conflict, which is common when a family member is dying.

"We take care of families that are conflicted every day," Cassin said. "It is
not unusual for the impending death of someone that everyone loves and
cherishes to be a time of great strife and pain and sadness, especially when
someone is very young. But it doesn't usually go to the extent of a court
battle," as was the case with Terri Schiavo.

Schiavo's husband and legal guardian, Michael, had successfully argued in court
for years that his wife's unwritten wish was to not be sustained by artificial
means if the need ever arose. Her parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, had insisted
until the end that their daughter might one day get better and that she'd never
have wanted to be cut off from food and water.

Perhaps the larger lesson of the case is America's reluctance to acknowledge
the inevitability of death.

"We are a death-denying society," Fins said. "Fundamentally, Americans believe
that there is always another technology to fix the next illness, and we've been
immensely successful.

"But the reality is that we are all frail," he added. "We are all going to die,
and human fragility is something that should be embraced and not ignored."

In Schiavo's case, as in so many others, the issue is not whether there was
hope for rehabilitation but what an individual would choose, the experts
stressed.

"It's always ambiguous. You don't know what kind of effect a treatment is going
to have," Cassin said. "We look at what the patient wants to do with their
life. That's what's at the heart of this, what Terri would have wanted."

"The issue isn't whether it's clear-cut or not. It's never totally clear-cut,"
she continued. "That isn't something anyone in the medical profession knows.
But what we can know is, 'How do you want to live your life.' "

More information

For more on advanced planning, visit Caring Connections (www.caringinfo.org ),
part of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.

Copyright + 2005 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.

Last Updated: April 01, 2005
     
Copyright+ 1994-2000 HealthCentral.com. All rights reserved.

--- Msged/2 6.0.1
 * Origin: The Nerve Center BBS - telnet via tncbbs.no-ip.com (1:261/1000)