Text 14589, 77 rader
Skriven 2005-08-13 23:28:00 av THURSTON ACKERMAN (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av JOHN HULL
Ärende: unfair attack on Roberts
================================

JH> AH>> I think this column is right on.  There is a right way to take issue
JH> TR> with
JH> AH>> a nominee's (or candidate's) policies, and a wrong way.  The ad in
JH> AH>> question was definitely the wrong way.

JH> AH>> Release of Roberts' papers for examination is also the right way.

JH> AH>> *******


JH> AH>> washingtonpost.com
JH> AH>> Stop the Roberts Bombing


JH> AH>> By E. J. Dionne Jr.
JH> AH>> Friday, August 12, 2005; A19


JH> AH>> Can we please come up with a better way of arguing about Supreme Court
JH> AH>> nominees?


JH> AH>> Fellow liberals, face it: The advertisement created by NARAL, the
JH> TR> abortion
JH> AH>> rights group that opposes John Roberts's nomination to the Supreme
JH> TR> Court,
JH> AH>> is outrageous. It ties Roberts to people who bombed abortion clinics.
JH> AH>> this isn't guilt by association, I don't know what is.



JH> TR> Its worse than that. Recently, there was a radio ad out there that clai
JH> TR> that Roberts not only drove an abortion clinic bomber *to* a clinic wit
JH> TR> their bomb, he (Roberts) even detonated the bomb with his own cell phon


JH> TR> That ad was out there. I heard that ad several times, over a period of
JH> TR> several days. And, when whoever put that ad up withdrew it because some
JH> TR> the democrat party thought it put their party in a bad light (*not* tha
JH>it
JH> TR> was a pack of lies....*not* that it was a bunch of libelous
JH>statements..but
JH> TR> that it *put their party in a bad light*!), Rush Limbaugh picked the ad
JH> TR> and played it throughout his show yesterday *for* them.


JH> TR> That is the sort of shit we are dealing with in the democrat party. By
JH> TR> way, Nancy Pelosi was closely associated with the putting up of that ad
JH> TR> She
JH> TR> *had* to know it was false claims, and went along with putting it out
JH>there
JH> TR> anyway.


JH> TR> You people suck!

JH>Tim, that ad was a parody put out by Rush Limbaugh, just like the dozens of
JH>other parodies he has done over the years.  The difference this time, howeve
JH>is that some dumb ass, humor impaired liberal heard it and ran with it as if
JH>were real, and THAT is what caused all the ruckus.  In typical fashion, then
JH>the Democrat leadership tried to make a big damn deal out of it getting all
JH>outraged and incensed over a joke.  In fact, he predicted, based on the lame
JH>brain calls he was getting from other humor impaired types, that exactly wha
JH>happened, would.

JH>The Democraps have lost it completely - as if we needed any more evidence, e
JH>:-)

I must admit this the first time I have seen Rush Limbaugh characterized
as comedian. (Live and learn 8-(

Stay young, OldAck.

---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
 * Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)