Text 22450, 86 rader
Skriven 2006-09-12 14:56:49 av Gary Braswell (1:123/789.0)
  Kommentar till text 22425 av John Hull (1:123/789.0)
Ärende: Sa
==========
John Hull -> Gary Braswell wrote:
 JH> Gary Braswell -> MIMI GALLANDT wrote:
 GB>> MIMI GALLANDT -> Stan Hardegree wrote:
 MG>>> Stan Hardegree wrote:

 EH>>>>> Heh heh heh... you have a way of painting a mental image. :-)

 VH>>>>> I know Sakowski -- he'll be praising Ramsey Clark to the skys if
 VH>>>>> we say anything at all about the trator.

 SH>>>> Ramsey Clark can rightfully claim the title of Godfather of the
 SH>>>> Moonbat movement.  The Lyndon LaRouche of the left.

 MG>>> Pardon a stupid question here; Isn't LaRouche on the left?

 MG>>> L'Chaim

 MG>>> Mimi

 MG>>> In the beginning
 MG>>> the Word already was.

 GB>> I was thinking hard on weather to allow this and decided to see what
 GB>> others though here.

 GB>> That you have come back without my permission is not good.

 JH> Then I have to say that as usual, you're a day late and a dollar short.
 JH>  Most of us gave our OK without any prompting from you over a week ago.
 JH> She didn't start posting till after that.  I assumed that she had a
 JH> green light, as I'm sure the rest did.  You should've been on top of
 JH> this from the gitgo.  You responded to the request to let Richard come
 JH> back almost immediately, before any real discussion on that took place.
 JH> That smacks of a double standard in my opinion.  If its OK for Richard,
 JH> then its OK for Mimi. Both have my vote. If you're going to be the
 JH> moderator, how about some consistency?

John,

I took some time to think about it, ok?

Chill.

What has been going on with Richard has been going on behind the scenes before
for some time and you had no knowledge of it.

Also, I wanted to allow ample time for people to voice their opinions on Mimi's
return. I figured since the topic had been broached and everyone here is pretty
intelligent and there is no ban on opinions, they would express how they felt
about the return of Mimi without my prompting it. But I asked anyway. Do I have
your approval for that as well?

Anyone who knows about Fido also should know you should assume nothing when it
comes to lifting a ban. If someone told her to come back they overstepped.

A lot of stuff goes on behind the scenes, you know that as you tried to help me
stop certain people from posting here who had been banned and others here who
complained I was doing nothing had no knowledge of what we were trying to do.
And I appreciated your help.

And, if its ok by you I am going to talk to Mimi myself and make a final
decision.

Letting some people back in last time and then having to take them out again
caused me some problems only one of you here knows anything about. I am not
real keen on going down that road again.

I have said it before and I will say it again. I was an absent moderator, that
was my fault and I apologize to everyone about it.

I also suffer from not wanting to kick people out of here since we have so few
left discussing anything. That has led to accusations of lack of consistency
and that is right.

As Earl suggested, I am going to go over the rules and make some changes as a
result of all this...provided I can recover them from my old HD. If I can't
I'll ask if anyone else has them or just start from scratch.

And I will warn you and Bob right now, the two of you being the most
foul-mouthed and vile motherfuckers in here, I will be giving you both
increasing vacations if you cannot control yourselves.

I am serious.

--- Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)