Text 22460, 129 rader
Skriven 2006-09-12 21:17:41 av Gary Braswell (1:123/789.0)
  Kommentar till text 22459 av John Hull (1:123/789.0)
Ärende: Sa
==========
John Hull -> Gary Braswell wrote:
 JH> Gary Braswell -> John Hull wrote:
 GB>> John Hull -> Gary Braswell wrote:
 JH>>> Gary Braswell -> MIMI GALLANDT wrote:
 GB>>>> MIMI GALLANDT -> Stan Hardegree wrote:
 MG>>>>> Stan Hardegree wrote:

 EH>>>>>>> Heh heh heh... you have a way of painting a mental image. :-)

 VH>>>>>>> I know Sakowski -- he'll be praising Ramsey Clark to the skys if
 VH>>>>>>> we say anything at all about the trator.

 SH>>>>>> Ramsey Clark can rightfully claim the title of Godfather of the
 SH>>>>>> Moonbat movement.  The Lyndon LaRouche of the left.

 MG>>>>> Pardon a stupid question here; Isn't LaRouche on the left?

 MG>>>>> L'Chaim

 MG>>>>> Mimi

 MG>>>>> In the beginning
 MG>>>>> the Word already was.

 GB>>>> I was thinking hard on weather to allow this and decided to see what
 GB>>>> others though here.

 GB>>>> That you have come back without my permission is not good.

 JH>>> Then I have to say that as usual, you're a day late and a dollar
 GB>> short.
 JH>>>  Most of us gave our OK without any prompting from you over a week
 GB>> ago.
 JH>>> She didn't start posting till after that.  I assumed that she had a
 JH>>> green light, as I'm sure the rest did.  You should've been on top of
 JH>>> this from the gitgo.  You responded to the request to let Richard
 JH> come
 JH>>> back almost immediately, before any real discussion on that took
 GB>> place.
 JH>>> That smacks of a double standard in my opinion.  If its OK for
 GB>> Richard,
 JH>>> then its OK for Mimi. Both have my vote. If you're going to be the
 JH>>> moderator, how about some consistency?

 GB>> John,

 GB>> I took some time to think about it, ok?

 GB>> Chill.

 GB>> What has been going on with Richard has been going on behind the
 JH> scenes
 GB>> before for some time and you had no knowledge of it.

 GB>> Also, I wanted to allow ample time for people to voice their
 JH> opinions on
 GB>> Mimi's return. I figured since the topic had been broached and
 JH> everyone
 GB>> here is pretty intelligent and there is no ban on opinions, they would
 GB>> express how they felt about the return of Mimi without my prompting
 JH> it.
 GB>> But I asked anyway. Do I have your approval for that as well?

 GB>> Anyone who knows about Fido also should know you should assume nothing
 GB>> when it comes to lifting a ban. If someone told her to come back they
 GB>> overstepped.

 GB>> A lot of stuff goes on behind the scenes, you know that as you
 JH> tried to
 GB>> help me stop certain people from posting here who had been banned and
 GB>> others here who complained I was doing nothing had no knowledge of
 JH> what
 GB>> we were trying to do. And I appreciated your help.

 GB>> And, if its ok by you I am going to talk to Mimi myself and make a
 JH> final
 GB>> decision.

 GB>> Letting some people back in last time and then having to take them out
 GB>> again caused me some problems only one of you here knows anything
 JH> about.
 GB>> I am not real keen on going down that road again.

 GB>> I have said it before and I will say it again. I was an absent
 GB>> moderator, that was my fault and I apologize to everyone about it.

 GB>> I also suffer from not wanting to kick people out of here since we
 JH> have
 GB>> so few left discussing anything. That has led to accusations of
 JH> lack of
 GB>> consistency and that is right.

 GB>> As Earl suggested, I am going to go over the rules and make some
 JH> changes
 GB>> as a result of all this...provided I can recover them from my old
 JH> HD. If
 GB>> I can't I'll ask if anyone else has them or just start from scratch.

 GB>> And I will warn you and Bob right now, the two of you being the most
 GB>> foul-mouthed and vile motherfuckers in here, I will be giving you both
 GB>> increasing vacations if you cannot control yourselves.

 GB>> I am serious.


 JH> If I jumped the gun by accusing you of being AWOL, mea culpa.  However,
 JH> if you were more forthcoming about what is going on, in general, maybe
 JH> that wouldn't have been the case.

 JH> As far as Bob goes, I didn't start that dance.  I take great exception
 JH> to anyone who calls me a Nazi, a Brownshirt, or anything equating that.
 JH> I don't think I should have to turn the other cheek to that kind of
 JH> crap.  I may disagree vehemently with someone over ideology and policy,
 JH> and I may get pretty harsh in the process, but I don't initiate that
 JH> kind of kind and never have.  The problem is not me, its Bob, and his
 JH> illogical, undeniable, and rabid hatred of Bush and anything
 JH> conservative.  You find a way to fix that, and you'll fix the other
 JH> problem at the same time.

I have exchanged emails with Mimi and will make up my mind soon on that.

As for Bob's hatred of Bush and conservative, there is an easy way to fix that.

Lets all elect liberals from here on out. He will be happy then.<g>

Running for cover....

--- Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)