Text 23756, 273 rader
Skriven 2006-10-11 19:30:00 av Jeff Binkley (1:226/600)
Ärende: Harry
=============
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/10/11/D8KMJ8I00.html

AP Exclusive: Reid Got $1M in Land Sale
Oct 11 2:13 PM US/Eastern
   
By JOHN SOLOMON and KATHLEEN HENNESSEY
Associated Press Writers

WASHINGTON

          

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on 
a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the 
property for three years, property deeds show. 
In the process, Reid did not disclose to Congress an earlier sale in 
which he transferred his land to a company created by a friend and took 
a financial stake in that company, according to records and interviews. 

The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime 
friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political 
bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime 
investigations. He's never been charged with wrongdoing _ except for a 
1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court. 

Land deeds obtained by The Associated Press during a review of Reid's 
business dealings show: 

_The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential 
property on Las Vegas' booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought 
one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown. One of the 
sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap 
that Reid supported. The seller never talked to Reid. 

_In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability 
corporation created by Brown. The senator didn't disclose the sale on 
his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in 
Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally 
owned the land. 

_After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping 
center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and 
Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's 
investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale. 

The complex dealings allowed Reid to transfer ownership, legal liability 
and some tax consequences to Brown's company without public knowledge, 
but still collect a seven-figure payoff nearly three years later. 

Reid hung up the phone when questioned about the deal during an AP 
interview last week. 

The senator's aides said no money changed hands in 2001 and that Reid 
instead got an ownership stake in Brown's company equal to the value of 
his land. Reid continued to pay taxes on the land and didn't disclose 
the deal because he considered it a "technical transfer," they said. 

They also said they have no documents proving Reid's stake in the 
company because it was an informal understanding between friends. 

The 1998 purchase "was a normal business transaction at market prices," 
Reid spokesman Jim Manley said. "There were several legal steps 
associated with the investment during those years that did not alter 
Senator Reid's actual ownership interest in the land." 

Senate ethics rules require lawmakers to disclose on their annual ethics 
report all transactions involving investment properties _ regardless of 
profit or loss _ and to report any ownership stake in companies. 

Kent Cooper, who oversaw government disclosure reports for federal 
candidates for two decades in the Federal Election Commission, said 
Reid's failure to report the 2001 sale and his ties to Brown's company 
violated Senate rules. 

"This is very, very clear," Cooper said. "Whether you make a profit or a 
loss you've got to put that transaction down so the public, voters, can 
see exactly what kind of money is moving to or from a member of 
Congress." 

"It is especially disconcerting when you have a member of the 
leadership, of either party, not putting in the effort to make sure this 
is a complete and accurate report," said Cooper. "That says something to 
other members. It says something to the Ethics Committee." 

Other parts of the deal _ such as the informal handling of property 
taxes _ raise questions about possible gifts or income reportable to 
Congress and the IRS, ethics experts said. 

Stanley Brand, former Democratic chief counsel of the House, said Reid 
should have disclosed the 2001 sale and that his omission fits a larger 
culture in Congress where lawmakers aren't following or enforcing their 
own rules. 

"It's like everything else we've seen in last two years. If it is not 
enforced, people think it's not enforced and they get lax and sloppy," 
Brand said. 

SALE HIDDEN FROM CONGRESS 

Reid and his wife, Landra, personally signed the deeds selling their 
full interest in the property to Brown's company, Patrick Lane LLC, for 
the same $400,000 they paid in 1998, records show. 

Despite the sale, Reid continued to report on his public ethics reports 
that he personally owned the land until it was sold again in His 
disclosure forms to Congress do not mention an interest in Patrick Lane 
or the company's role in the 2004 sale. 

AP first learned of the transaction from a former Reid aide who 
expressed concern the deal hadn't been properly reported. 

Reid isn't listed anywhere on Patrick Lane's corporate filings with 
Nevada, even though the land he sold accounted for three-quarters of the 
company's assets. Brown is listed as the company's manager. Reid's 
office said Nevada law didn't require Reid to be mentioned in the 
filings. 

"We have been friends for over 35 years. We didn't need a written 
agreement between us," Brown said. 

The informalities didn't stop there. 

PROPERTY TAXES LOOSELY HANDLED 

Brown sometimes paid a share of the local property taxes on the lot Reid 
owned outright between 1998 and 2001, while Reid sometimes paid more 
than his share of taxes on the second parcel they co-owned. 

And the two men continued to pay the property taxes from their personal 
checking accounts even after the land was sold to Patrick Lane in 2001, 
records show. 

Brown said Reid first approached him in 1997 about land purchases and 
the two men considered the two lots a single investment. 

"During the years of ownership, there may have been occasions that he 
advanced the property taxes, or that I advanced the property taxes," 
Brown said. "The bottom line is that between ourselves we always settled 
up and each of us paid our respective percentages." 

Ultimately, Reid paid about 74 percent of the property taxes, slightly 
less than his actual 75.1 ownership stake, according to canceled checks 
kept at the local assessor's office. One year, the property tax payments 
were delinquent and resulted in a small penalty, the records show. 

Ethics experts said such informality raises questions about whether any 
of Brown's tax payments amounted to a benefit for Reid. "It might be a 
gift," Cooper said. 

Brand said the IRS might view the handling of the land taxes as 
undisclosed income to Reid but it was unlikely to prompt an 
investigation. "If someone is paying a liability you owe, there may be 
some income imputed. But at that level, it's pretty small dollars," he 
said. 

FEDERAL LAND SWAPS 

Nevada land deeds show Reid and his wife first bought the property in 
January 1998 in a proposed subdivision created partly with federal lands 
transferred by the Interior Department to private developers. 

Reid's two lots were never owned by the government, but the piece of 
land joining Reid's property to the street corner _ a key to the 
shopping center deal _ came from the government in 1994. 

One of the sellers was Fred Lessman, a vice president of land 
acquisition at Perma-Bilt Homes. 

Around the time of the 1998 sale, Lessman and his company were 
completing a complicated federal land transfer that also involved an 
Arizona-based developer named Del Webb Corp. 

In the deal, Del Webb and Perma-Bilt purchased environmentally sensitive 
lands in the Lake Tahoe area, transferred them to the government and 
then got in exchange several pieces of valuable Las Vegas land. 

Lessman was personally involved, writing a March 1997 letter to Interior 
lobbying for the deal. "This exchange has been through many trials and 
tribulations ... we do not need to create any more stumbling blocks," 
Lessman wrote. 

For years, Reid also had been encouraging Interior to make land swaps on 
behalf of Del Webb, where one of his former aides worked. 

In 1994, Reid wrote a letter with other Nevada lawmakers on behalf of 
Del Webb, and then met personally with a top federal land official in 
Nevada. That official claimed in media reports he felt pressured by the 
senator. Reid denied any pressure. 

The next year, Reid collected $18,000 in political donations from Del 
Webb's political action committee and employees. Del Webb's efforts to 
get federal land dragged on. 

In December 1996, Reid wrote a second letter on behalf of Del Webb, 
urging Interior to answer the company's concerns. The deal came together 
in summer and fall 1997, with Perma-Bilt joining in. 

In January 1998 _ just days before he bought his land _ Reid applauded 
the Lake Tahoe land transfers, saying they would create the "gateway to 
paradise." 

None of Reid's letters mentioned Perma-Bilt. Reid's office said the 
senator never met Lessman nor discussed the Lake Tahoe land transfer or 
his personal land purchase. A real estate attorney handled the 1998 sale 
at arms-length, aides said. 

"This land investment was completely unrelated to federal land swaps 
that took place in the mid-1990's," Manley said. 

Lessman said he never talked to Reid or asked for his help before the 
1998 land sale, and only met the senator years later at a public event. 
"Any suggestion that the land sale between Senator Reid and myself is 
somehow tied in with the Perma-Bilt exchange is completely absurd," 
Lessman said. 

THE REZONING 

Clark County intended for the property Reid owned to be used solely for 
new housing, records show. Just days before Reid sold the parcels to 
Brown's company, Brown sought permission in May 2001 to rezone the 
properties so a shopping center could be built. 

Career zoning officials objected, saying the request was "inconsistent" 
with Clark County's master development plan. The town board in Spring 
Valley, where Reid's property was located, also voted 4-1 to reject the 
rezoning. 

Brown persisted. The Clark County zoning board followed by the Clark 
County Commission voted to overrule the recommendation and approve 
commercial zoning. Such votes were common at the time. 

Before the approval in September 2001, Brown's consultant told 
commissioners that Reid was involved. "Mr. Brown's partner is Harry 
Reid, so I think we have people in this community who you can trust to 
go forward and put a quality project before you," the consultant 
testified. 

With the rezoning granted, Patrick Lane pursued the shopping center 
deal. On Jan. 20, 2004, the company sold the property to developers for 
$1.6 million. Today, a multimillion dollar retail complex sits on the 
land. 

On Jan. 21, 2004, Reid received more than $1.1 million of the sale 
proceeds. Reid disclosed the money the following year on his Senate 
ethics report as a personal sale of land, not mentioning Patrick Lane. 

A BUSINESS PARTNER'S PAST 

Brown has been a behind-the-scenes power broker in Nevada for years, 
donating to Democrats, Republicans and charities. He represented a major 
casino in legal cases and dabbled in Nevada's booming real estate 
market. 

Brown befriended Reid four decades ago, even before Reid served as 
chairman of the Nevada gaming commission and decided cases involving 
Brown's clients. 

Brown's name has surfaced in federal investigations involving organized 
crime, casinos and political bribery since the 1980s. 

This past summer, federal prosecutors introduced testimony at the 
bribery trial of former Clark County Commission chairman Dario Herrara 
that Brown had taken money from a Las Vegas strip club owner to 
influence the commission. Herrara was convicted of taking kickbacks. 
Brown was never called as a witness. 

Brown declined to discuss past cases where his name surfaced, including 
Herrara. "The federal government investigated this whole matter 
thoroughly, and there was never any implication of impropriety on my 
part," he said.

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
 * Origin:  (1:226/600)