Text 3067, 79 rader
Skriven 2004-10-05 06:19:52 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
     Kommentar till en text av Alan Hess
Ärende: Stoopid Kerry
=====================
04 Oct 04 14:21, Alan Hess wrote to Ross Cassell:

 AH> Whilst masticating on <Oct 04 04>, Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
 AH> wrote to All:

 RC>> Panama: Druggie Noriega

 AH> Didn't we support him before we changed our mind?

 RC>> Read, we need world permission to defend ourselves..

 RC>> Britain didnt need permission for the Falklands action!

 AH> British people were at risk.  That was also considered British 
 AH> land by the British (of course, that's the same rationale Saddam 
 AH> used to invade Kuwait.)

 AH> Japan didn't need world permission for Pearl Harbor, which they 
 AH> considered a defensive preemptive move.  

Crap.  They were in no danger of being attacked by the US.  They tried to take
us out of the picture to give themselves a free rein in taking over the entire
Pacific basin, knowing we would oppose that.  They screwed up when they didn't
follow through and finish the job.


 RC>> KERRY: I mean, we can remember when President Kennedy in the 
 RC>> Cuban missile crisis sent his secretary of state to Paris to meet 
 RC>> with DeGaulle. And in the middle of the discussion, to tell them 
 RC>> about the missiles in Cuba, he said, "Here, let me show you the 
 RC>> photos." And DeGaulle waved them off and said, "No, no, no, no. 
 RC>> The word of the president of the United States is good enough for 
 RC>> me."

 RC>> [My Comments]

 RC>> Kennedy didnt have to do this, the Soviets had missiles on Cuba, 
 RC>> not Corsica.

 RC>> [end]

 AH> And, thanks to Bush, world leaders no longer trust our word as 
 AH> they did Kennedy's.

More crap.  All those other world leaders had the same intel we did.  The only
reason France and Germany and Russia tried to scuttle our efforts was because
they had Saddam on the hook for nearly 50 billion dollars in payoffs and
kickbacks and didn't want to lose that money.  

 RC>> How many leaders in the world today would respond to us, as a 
 RC>> result of what we've done, in that way? So what is at test here 
 RC>> is the credibility of the United States of America and how we 
 RC>> lead the world. And Iran and Iraq are now more dangerous -- Iran 
 RC>> and North Korea are now more dangerous.

 AH> And we've pissed away our credibility.

 RC>> [My comments]

 RC>> Uh, North Korea violated a treaty or agreement brokered by 
 RC>> Clinton, Iran is thumbing its nose at the International Atomic 
 RC>> Agency and the UN, yet lets blame Bush.

 RC>> Lets blame North Korea and Iran for their own fuckups..

 RC>> [end]

 AH> They're at fault for their fuckups, we're at fault for ours.  

Most of the so-called fuckups you're talking about, are figments of the
Democrat's fevered minds.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin: We are the Watchmen of our own Liberty! (1:379/1.99)