Text 620, 69 rader
Skriven 2004-08-04 07:28:59 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
    Kommentar till text 581 av THURSTON ACKERMAN (1:123/140)
Ärende: President John Kerry !!
===============================
03 Aug 04 23:59, THURSTON ACKERMAN wrote to JOHN HULL:

 JH>>01 Aug 04 22:54, THURSTON ACKERMAN wrote to JOHN HULL:

 JH>> JH>>31 Jul 04 22:48, THURSTON ACKERMAN wrote to VERN HUMPHREY:

 JH>> JH>> VH>>TA>VH>TA>Its been a long time since this old Sarg. found 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>any TA>VH>TA>tears in his eyes while listening to 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>political TA>VH>speachs; TA>but tonight Senator Kerry's 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>daughters started TA>VH>me down TA>that path and then he 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>helped me determine I TA>VH>have got to TA>stick around at 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>least until Novenber 2004 TA>VH>so I can help TA>elect 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>John Kerry for the best well being TA>VH>for my grand 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>TA>children (and I may stick around a little TA>VH>longer 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>to see TA>my first great grand child by my TA>VH>grandson 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>being married TA>Oct 23, 2004 !-)

 JH>> JH>> VH>>TA>VH>You hate your great grand child all that much, eh?

 JH>> JH>> VH>>TA>Not really Vern (my grandson was my real "giteven" 
 JH>> JH>> VH>>token TA>8-)

 JH>> JH>> VH>>Then why wish crushing taxes and declining opportunity on
 JH>> JH>> VH>>them?

 JH>> JH>> TA> President Kerry said he was going cut the taxs for those 
 JH>> JH>> TA> of us that make less than $200,000.00 per year, so we will
 JH>> JH>> TA>  welcome that. You and the others that make more than 
 JH>> JH>> TA> $200,000.00 will get the opportunity to finally share the 
 JH>> JH>> TA> wealth. Thank you.

 JH>> JH>>Well, hell, why not?  They're already paying something like 
 JH>> JH>>80% of the taxes now, why not let them pay the rest?  You cheap
 JH>> JH>> skunk!

 JH>> TA> You are not the first to recognize my frugality; (but seldom 
 JH>> TA> few while we are paying cribbage 8-).

 JH>> TA> I am further confused by the fact that John Massey cited that
 JH>> TA> those "with AGI above $200,000.00 per year pay app. 45% of all 
 JH>> TA> income taxs"; rather than the 80% you cite.

 JH>> TA> I am sure your 80% figure isn't a figure of imagination. 
 JH>> TA> Possibly it includes state income taxs? As a citizen of the 
 JH>> TA> Commonwealth of Massachusetts, I could understand that.

 JH>>Perhaps you noticed I said "something like 80%"?  That means its a
 JH>>approximation, not a specific precise figure.  The point being that 
 JH>>only a small percentage of the tax-paying population pays the 
 JH>>majority of the tax. Everybody else pays little or no tax, yet the 
 JH>>Dems would have us believe tha somehow they are getting cheated by 
 JH>>those who DO pay the majority of tax.  S a notion is not only 
 JH>>dishonest, its criminal.

 TA> Honesty is quite subjective. Criminality is more precise. I will 
 TA> have to check with my kid-brother lawyer (Replublican in DC), before I 
 TA> can debate that further with you John.

Honesty is NOT subjective.  You either are or you aren't.  There are dishonest
types on both sides, but I find that dishonesty is a matter of policy with
liberals.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin: We are the Watchmen of our own Liberty! (1:379/1.99)