Text 6277, 71 rader
Skriven 2004-12-15 08:33:40 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
   Kommentar till text 6274 av RICHARD HELM (1:123/140)
Ärende: Breaking News!
======================

 BF>> I have.
 BF>> Perhaps no one bothred to deal with it since it was so commom and if you
 BF>> listen to your comrades, there are those who says I'm right so obviously
 BF>> there are some truth in it.

 RH> They are NOT my comrades and what the two that "claim" you are right are
 RH> dealing with what happened long before the UCMJ was created.  Any old
 RH> bastard that continually refers to enlisted as "swine" isn't much of one
 RH> to count on for creditability on military matters.

Ohhhh.......


 BF>> Not to take pictures applys to anywhere where the military is.

 RH> You're grasping for straws.  The FACT is that to own a camera and take
 RH> pictures with a camera by a military person is NOT in violation of ANY US
 RH> law.

I have sent a question to our military to ask if it's against any "war-laws" to
take pics.

  BF>> Do you think that even every policeofficer knows about every law in the
 BF>> law- book? Was it your job to know every regulation? Many had cameras and
 BF>> took pictures and many policeofficer do drive over speed limit so what?

 RH> Straw grasper.

 RH> You WANT your version to be true and are willing to reject any view that
 RH> opposes yours.  If there is any truth in what you claim about members of
 RH> the military taking pictures, you should be able to provide a verifiable
 RH> cite in US Code.  IOW Put up or shut up.

See above and what I'm refering to is the opinion of your own "expert".
Why can't you prove to me it's according to the rules to take pics.
Why should I believe you just because *you* say so?
Like you say to me: Put up or shut up.

 BF>> If there wasn't any who reported those who took pictures to JAG, then
 BF>> naturally he haven't heard of it.

 RH> Grasping at straws.  They weren't reported because there is no laws to
 RH> violate.

Why don't you prove that then?

 BF>> Why don't you try to find out if it's against the law to take pics.
 BF>> instead of trying to fool yourself?

 RH> Why don'y YOU provide a cite s bit better than some shit that you seen on
 RH> Swedish TV?

Who are the best to look it up? You must be better then me to search an
American
site but perhaps you wouldn't like what you might find, and I only have a
dial-up
so it isn't that intresting for me.

 RH>>> Either you misunderstood what was said on that TV program or you have
 RH>>> allowed your prejudices to over rule logic, or both.

 BF>> I understood what he said and it was even translated to Swedish.

 RH> In that case "he" lied to you and you took it.

Then comes the next questions.
Are all your military "experts" liers? And why would he lie?

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)