Text 7014, 97 rader
Skriven 2005-01-05 22:58:00 av Darryl Perry (1:106/324)
     Kommentar till en text av John Hull
Ärende: Re: Special Treatment
=============================
On 01-05-05, John Hull said...
 
JH> Darryl Perry -> Gary Braswell wrote:
JH>  DP> On 01-05-05, Gary Braswell said...
JH> 
JH>  GB>> Darryl Perry -> Ed Hulett wrote:
JH> 
JH>  DP>>> On 01-04-05, Ed Hulett said...
JH> 
JH>  EH>>>> Darryl Perry -> Stan Hardegree wrote:
JH> 
JH>  DP>>>>> On 01-03-05, Stan Hardegree said...
JH> 
JH>  DP>>>>>>>>> GWB got special treatment to get into the champaign squadron
JH> 
JH>  SH>>>>>>>> You are a liar.
JH> 
JH>  DP>>>>>>> Prove that I'm wrong.
JH> 
JH>  SH>>>>>> Screw you.  You made the claim, YOU substantiate it.
JH> 
JH>  DP>>>>> I made the claim and I stand by it.  You call me a liar, and if
JH>  DP>>> you c
JH>  DP>>>>> prove that, then screw YOU!
JH> 
JH>  EH>>>> So, let me get this straight. You made the claim and stand by
JH>  DP> it whi
JH>  EH>>>> refusing to show any proof. At the same time, Stan is required to
JH>  DP>>> prove hi
JH>  EH>>>> assertion that you are a liar?
JH> 
JH>  DP>>> Stan initially did not ever require that I show proof for my
JH>  DP> claims.
JH>  DP>>> just threw out the 'you are a liar' claim.  It was me who first
JH>  DP> calle
JH>  DP>>> for substatiation on HIS claim.  If he doesn't want to show any
JH>  DP> proof
JH>  GB>> why
JH>  DP>>> should I?
JH> 
JH>  GB>> Its a rule on the echo, put up or shut up.
JH> 
JH>  GB>> Since you made a claim that GW got special treatment to get into his
JH>  DP> squad
JH>  GB>> you made the initial claim.
JH> 
JH>  GB>> They were asking for proof of that claim.
JH> 
JH>  DP> Stan made no request for proof of a claim.  He just made a personal 
JH> attack.
JH>  DP> How inclinde would you be to be accomdating under those condidions.
JH> 
JH>  GB>> While I personally suspect he did get some special treatment, asked
JH>  DP> or not
JH>  GB>> my knowledge there is no proof of it happening. The offspring of
JH>  DP> powerful
JH>  GB>> often get special treatment, even if they or their parents don't ask
JH>  DP> for i
JH> 
JH>  GB>> So if you have some proof, post it.
JH> 
JH>  DP> I did.  See my previous post.  I cite an article that reports that th
JH>  DP> person who actually gave him the preferential treatment admitted doin
JH> so.
JH>  DP> It wasn't some 3rd party person who heard it from another source or o
JH>  DP> tripe like that.
JH> 
JH> I would like to point out that citing something that is 5 years old and ha
JH> been debunked by the guy's own children, not to mention every officer in 
JH> Bush's chain of command is not much of a source.  Kerry tried to use this 
JH> article as background during the CBS document scandal, and it got blown ou
JH> the water again.
JH> 
JH> 
JH>  GB>> As a general rule, people who have been in echo for some time and ha
JH>  GB>> established their reputation for not lying and making up claims.
JH> 
JH>  DP> No, but they can go around making personal attacks I see.  They do al
JH> have
JH>  DP> reputations, that is for certain.
JH> 
JH> Another FYI.  We never used to be that way.  Back in the day when people 
JH> followed the rules as a personal thing rather than because they had to, yo
JH> didn't see this sort of stuff.  But, you can't expect a good dog to remain
JH> good dog if you go out and beat it every afternoon while its chained up.  
JH> you end up with is a vicious animal looking for the jugular.

That's all well and good.  I assume then that much like hazing, if it was
done to you, you just have to do it to others?

The attacks still go on, nobody cares to stop them, and they will continue
to go on.

 gryphon o aka darryl perry o cyberia bbs o cyberia.darktech.org o mystic/lnx

--- Mystic BBS v1.07.3 (Linux)
 * Origin: Cyberia BBS : cyberia.darktech.org : Kingwood, TX (1:106/324)