Text 7848, 129 rader
Skriven 2005-01-22 21:20:00 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
   Kommentar till text 7827 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Tsunami Disaster Reli
=============================
Björn Forsström -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 BF>>> Who is now trying to bullying and make another person look bad?

 EH>> You?

 BF> Why not?

Why do you need to bully?

 BF>>> You asked a simple question and I try to answer as good as I can and you
 BF>>> can't behave as an adult.


 EH>> You obviously don't know how an adult behaves. Asking you to support your
 EH>> assertion isn't bullying you. It's asking you to explain yourself.

 BF> The adult way is to ask a polite question and to consider the answer you
get and
 BF> then answer back in a polite way. That's what I have been tought.

When have you been polite?

 EH>> You can't handle it, then what are you doing here?

 BF> What I can't handle is the rude way of your behaviour.

Then don't reply to me.

 BF>>> Have you ever heard of a navel string?

 EH>> Umbilical cord, you mean? That is how the baby gets fed. There is no
blood
 EH>> exchanged from mother to child. It *IS* a seperate life.

 BF> There is blood in the umbilical cord, going to the mothers placenta.

The blood is not exchanged between the mother and child. It matters not whether
there is blood in the umbilical. The mother's blood does not mix with the
baby's or visa versa.

 BF> Where would it
 BF> else go and what should pass in the umbilical cord if it wasn't blood? A
 BF> T-boone steak?  :-)

Nutrients. There is no blood from the mother going to the child.

 BF>>>>> Normally I would answer yes and it's sacred but here there are so many
 BF>>>>> factors to consider. If it's well and healty it shouldn't be any
 BF>>>>> problem but if it's very handicaped without any brain-function, can we
 BF>>>>> then say it's a life?

 EH>>>> Good grief. You leftists are all alike. How often does that happen?

 BF>>> That doesn't matter so will you please try to answer MY question without
 BF>>> coming with stupid remarks.

 EH>> It certainly *DOES* matter. What you describe happens very seldom. The
 EH>> numbers are so low it shouldn't be a factor.

 BF> BUT, it still happens so what's to be done?

It is very possible that the tests gave an incorrect finding. What should be
done, then?

Just recently, an abortion advocate found she was pregnant with triplets. She
had 2 of them removed because she didn't want to be burdoned with three babies
at one time. *THAT* is wrong on so many levels.

 BF>>>>> And what if it's a result of a rape? Then it's up to the mother to
 BF>>>>> decide and then it should be removed within 20 weeks and is it then a
 BF>>>>> life at all?

 EH>>>> The unborn didn't rape the mother.

 BF>>> Have you ever had any sexual education? You can't have since you can
come
 BF>>> up with a statment like that.

 EH>> Do they teach that the unborn is the rapist in your sex education
classes?

 BF> It wasn't me who said anything about the child beeing a rapist. A only
asked what
 BF> should be done if the baby is the result of a rape.

Like I said, the baby isn't the rapist, so why punish it? If the mother doesn't
want it, there are millions of couples just waiting to adopt.

 BF>>>>> Sorry, but I don't have a given answer to this. There are so many
 BF>>>>> factors to consider and to what world this child is to grow up in etc.
 BF>>>>> etc.

 EH>>>> Well, this doesn't say much for your claim that all life should be
 EH>>>> sacred.

 BF>>> You obviously think that it's ok like it is in USA where the government
 BF>>> decides for all mothers to give birth to all unborns no matter what.

 EH>> You obviously haven't a clue how things are in the US. The government
does
 EH>> no such thing.

 BF> Now how could I when all you do is to condemn what I say without any
axplanation
 BF> of how it works in USA.

It's rather easy to find out. It isn't up to me to educate you.

 BF> Is it OK to do an abortion or not? If it is, then who is to decide that?

Abortion is legal here in the states and it is the mother's choice to make even
to the extent that underage girls can have one without informing their parents
that they are even pregnant.

 BF>>> Can your stupidity depend on that your wiman also have to give birth to
 BF>>> the inbreeded once as well?

 EH>> Huh? You aren't making any sense.

 BF> I didn't expect you to understan that.

Intersting. You're English is so poor your statement is gibberish. Utterly
unintelligible.

Ed

--- Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)