Text 7976, 91 rader
Skriven 2005-01-25 05:07:02 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
   Kommentar till text 7903 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
Ärende: Unborn
==============
Björn Forsström -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 EH>> It *IS* a human life regardless of what you or I say, period!

 BF> And who have decided that? Only you. Have you listned to any experts about
 BF> this such as a scientist or a doctor or is it only your own *opinion*?

Are you suggesting it *ISN'T* a human life?

All I have to support my "opinion" is that its parents are both human so it
MUST be human. It can't be a turnip!

 EH>>>> The woman should make the "choice" *BEFORE* becoming pregnant.

 BF>>> So, it's only up to the woman? And I who thought it takes two to make a
 BF>>> child. How silly I am.

 EH>> The woman has the ultimate choice. If she doesn't want to have a child,
 EH>> she should either abstain from sexual contact or use contraceptives.

 BF> And what about if the woman has no saying in this and have you never heard
 BF> of a man having to use a condom?

Is a condom a contraceptive? If so, I covered that. Maybe I should have said
that the *PARENTS* should use contraceptives.

 BF> It's to darn simple to only put the blaim on the woman. As I said, it
 BF> takes two.

No one is putting the blame on the woman. In this country the pro-abortionists
say it is the woman's choice and the man has no say in it at all.

 BF>>> Sorry, we say here that it's in the stomach, just to simplify it and I
 BF>>> think you understood me, you just couldn't let it pass and now when you
 BF>>> mention the DNA I guess you are right.

 EH>> Ah, so you forgot it had its own unique DNA? Now, who should go back to
 EH>> sex education?

 BF> WOW, I have to know about DNA to have sex.

No, but you have to know about DNA to continue on with this discussion.

 BF> Wonder how they manage to have sex before we knew about DNA.

Hey, this is your strawman, you burn it up.

 EH>>>> It has its own unique DNA from day one. It *IS* a life of its own.

 BF>>> But what kind of life is it? Even a flower have a DNA and what kind of
 BF>>> life is that? Are they comparable just because they both have a unique
 BF>>> DNA? I hope you realize that this subject isn't as easy as you would
like
 BF>>> to make it.

 EH>> It is a *HUMAN* life! It could never be anything other than a human life.
 EH>> Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot and shouldn't be discussing the
 EH>> issue.

 BF> According to the experts it's an embryo (try to look that up and see what
it means)
 BF> for the first six weeks that's to BE a human life.

It is a *HUMAN* embryo. It can never be anything *BUT* human.

 BF> Jeezzee, then not even the experts should be discussing this.

Beat that strawman!

 BF>>>>> Some answers would be appreciated.

 EH>>>> See above.

 BF>>> Thanks. At least we are coming somewhere.

 EH>> I have always provided answers. You must be confused because of the
public
 EH>> nature of this forum. Anyone can and has replied to you. We aren't all
the
 EH>> same person!

 BF> Not any real answers, only your opinion.

Good grief... so only you can have the truth... all I get are my opinions.

Yowza!

Ed

--- Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)