Text 8872, 223 rader
Skriven 2005-02-09 05:33:00 av Jeff Binkley (1:226/600)
Ärende: Clinton Bash
====================
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/09/nyregion/09clintons.html?ex=1108530000
&en=0952277707fe41cc&ei=5065&partner=MYWAY


Lesson of Clinton Fund-Raiser: Double-Check That Donor List
By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ and IAN URBINA 

Published: February 9, 2005


ASHINGTON, Feb. 8 - In August 2000, Bill and Hillary Clinton attended a 
Hollywood fund-raiser billed as a tribute to a president ready to leave 
the White House after eight years and a first lady seeking to establish 
herself as a force of her own in American politics.

The guest list reflected the glitter of the occasion: Cher, Diana Ross, 
Brad Pitt and Patti LaBelle, to name just a few. But a person who later 
emerged as perhaps the most memorable - to the Clintons and their 
associates, anyway - was a well-connected figure with a checkered past 
who helped organize the event. He is Peter Paul, a man who pleaded 
guilty to cocaine possession and trying to defraud Fidel Castro's 
government out of millions of dollars in 1979, among other things.

Mr. Paul said he spent nearly $2 million of his own on the fund-raiser 
as a way to curry favor with Mr. Clinton, and photographs show him 
chatting with Mr. Clinton at a dinner table, having a discussion with 
Mrs. Clinton and striking poses for the camera with both of them.

Associates of the Clintons say the couple did not know of Mr. Paul's 
troubled past at the time, and in the months after the event, Mr. Paul 
turned on the Clintons, later urging investigators to look into the fund-
raiser.

Last month, the federal investigation produced an indictment charging 
that the cost of the affair had been underreported.

The case offers a bizarre and tangled tale of how Mr. Paul, a smooth 
operator with myriad connections and a troubled past, got so close to 
America's first couple in a political culture dominated by money. It 
also shows the continuing effort of a longtime nemesis of the Clintons, 
Judicial Watch, a conservative legal group, to make legal trouble for 
the couple.

A spokesman for the Justice Department, Bryan Sierra, said in a recent 
interview that Mrs. Clinton was not a subject of the investigation that 
led to the indictment, which named not Mr. Paul, but another person 
connected to the event, David Rosen, the finance director of Mrs. 
Clinton's Senate campaign, who is accused of underreporting the cost of 
the fund-raiser. No one else has been accused of any wrongdoing arising 
from the accusations.

Beyond that, people involved in Mrs. Clinton's 2000 campaign expressed 
bafflement at the indictment, not only noting that prosecutors had 
failed to state Mr. Rosen's motive but also arguing that Mr. Rosen did 
not, in fact, have a motive, since underreporting the contributions 
would not have produced any financial benefit for Mrs. Clinton's 
campaign under a complicated series of campaign-finance rules.

But one official at the Federal Election Commission disagreed, saying 
that there was a possible advantage to underreporting such contributions 
in a case like this: to have more money to spend on the campaign itself.

In addition, Clinton advisers say that Mrs. Clinton's campaign had no 
idea about Mr. Paul's troubled past until after the gala - and that Mr. 
Paul was involved only because of his association with a successful 
Internet company he started with the co-creator of Spider-Man, Stan Lee, 
who was listed as one of the co-hosts of the event. One Clinton adviser 
described Mr. Lee as "an American icon."

Mrs. Clinton's advisers referred questions to David Kendall, a lawyer 
for the Clintons. Mr. Kendall dismissed Mr. Paul's claim that a deal had 
been struck to have the President assist Mr. Paul in his business 
dealings provided that Mr. Paul raised money for Mrs. Clinton's 
campaign. "There was never any kind of quid pro quo," he said.

During an interview he gave to The New York Times in 2001, Mr. Rosen 
himself expressed bewilderment at how far Mr. Paul got. "I've never seen 
a guy like this," Mr. Rosen said. "I wish I'd never bumped into him in 
the first place." Mr. Rosen did not return two more recent phone calls 
requesting comment on the matter.

Mr. Paul's past is certainly colorful. Two decades ago, he served 42 
months in federal prison and his law license was suspended after he 
pleaded guilty to cocaine possession and trying to defraud the Cuban 
government out of $8.7 million in a complicated scheme involving coffee 
sales to the Soviet Union from Cuba.

By 1999, Mr. Paul teamed up with Mr. Lee to create Stan Lee Media, a 
multimedia company based in the San Fernando Valley that, among other 
things, introduced animated superheroes on the Internet.

He got involved in Democratic politics afterward, donating money at the 
suggestion of Aaron Tonken, also a fund-raiser, who told him that that 
would be a good way to raise the profile of his company, according to 
Mr. Paul and his legal representatives at Judicial Watch, a conservative 
legal group that has dogged the Clintons for years and has been 
representing Mr. Paul. (Among the ideas Mr. Paul had was trying to get 
Mr. Clinton to serve on the board of his company, he said.)

It was then that Mr. Paul claims he began having discussions with 
Democratic operatives close to the Clintons, including Mr. Rosen, about 
how to get Mr. Clinton to help bolster the image of Stan Lee Media after 
he left office.

Mr. Paul claims that he was eventually told by Mr. Rosen and Jim Levin, 
a former Chicago strip club owner who was a major Clinton donor, that 
the best way to win favor with Mr. Clinton was to raise money for Mrs. 
Clinton's Senate campaign in New York. The idea for the fund-raiser was 
subsequently born.

"My motivation had nothing to do with getting Hillary elected senator," 
Mr. Paul said the other day in an interview from his home in North 
Carolina, where he is under house arrest in a separate case. "I could 
care less about that. My motivation was to do this as a favor to Bill to 
demonstrate my good faith."

By nearly any measure, the Aug. 12 fund-raiser Mr. Paul organized - 
billed as The Hollywood Gala Salute to William Jefferson Clinton - was a 
success. It drew some of the biggest names in the entertainment 
industry, including Gregory Peck, John Travolta, Melissa Etheridge and 
Muhammad Ali. And it raised more than $1 million, according to the 
indictment against Mr. Rosen.

It was such a popular affair that Democrats close to Al Gore, who was 
running for president at the time, complained that the Clintons were 
upstaging Mr. Gore at the same time he was set to be nominated at the 
Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles.

"It was the most spectacular event that I organized in my life," Mr. 
Tonken recalled in a telephone interview from federal prison, where he 
is serving a sentence for defrauding donors of charity events he 
organized. "I thought if I could pull this event off, it would be the 
highlight of my career."

Mr. Paul even has personal thank-you notes from both Clintons afterward, 
as well as photographs of him and the Clintons at the affair. Judicial 
Watch provided those items to The New York Times.

"Thank you so very much for hosting Saturday night's tribute to the 
President and for everything you did to make it the great occasion that 
it was," Mrs. Clinton said in a note to Mr. Paul dated Aug. 18, 2000. 
"We will remember it always."

But not long after the Aug. 12 event, Mrs. Clinton's campaign appeared 
to begin distancing itself from Mr. Paul as disclosures of his previous 
felony convictions surfaced publicly. On Aug. 16, a spokesman for Mrs. 
Clinton's campaign told The Washington Post that the campaign would 
return $2,000 in campaign donations that Mr. Paul had directly made.

Mr. Paul said he began having misgivings about the Clintons in the 
months after the event. "The knee-jerk reaction was to distance 
themselves from me when my 25-year-old record was exposed," he said in 
an interview. "This was something that I heard came from their press 
office. I don't know how much Mrs. Clinton was involved in the decision. 
But once they said they didn't know me, their flag was planted and they 
didn't have much wiggle room."

In early 2001, Stan Lee Media declared bankruptcy, according to Mr. 
Paul. Federal investigators soon began asking questions about the 
company's demise. Around that time, Mr. Paul boarded a plane to Brazil, 
where he says he had a home and a business.

(Eventually, in June 2001, Mr. Paul and three other men were indicted on 
charges that they inflated the stock of Stan Lee Media and then sold it 
for a profit. He was extradited to the United States in August 2001.)

Mr. Paul says that he went public with his concerns about financial 
matters involving Mr. Rosen and the Clinton campaign after discovering 
irregularities in the financial disclosure statements filed by the 
campaign. But allies of the Clintons say he made the accusations in an 
attempt to cut a deal with prosecutors investigating the financial 
improprieties at Stan Lee Media.

Mr. Paul's charges did not appear to go anywhere for years. 

Then last month, federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment of Mr. Rosen 
by a grand jury in California, accusing him of falsely reporting that 
the August 2000 gala cost $401,419 when it actually cost at least $1.2 
million. While the indictment does not mention Mr. Paul by name, it said 
the event was paid for with more than $1.1 million worth of "in-kind" 
contributions of goods and services from an unidentified donor. 

As a professional fund-raiser and the chief finance director for the 
campaign, Mr. Rosen was responsible for all planning and costs for the 
event, according to the indictment. Mr. Rosen is also accused of 
obtaining and delivering a false invoice stating that the cost of the 
concert part of the event was $200,000, when in fact it actually cost 
more than $600,000, according to the indictment. Mr. Rosen faces four 
counts of lying to the election commission. Each count carries a penalty 
of up to five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines upon 
conviction.

In an interview, Mr. Rosen's lawyer, Paul Sandler, would not discuss the 
case other than to say: "He's innocent and we will present our case in 
court." But in a 2001 interview with The New York Times, Mr. Rosen said 
that Mr. Paul was making the accusations against him and the Clinton 
campaign as "a way to get immunity" from the charges he might face in 
the investigation involving Stan Lee Media.

"He's a desperate man," Mr. Rosen said of Mr. Paul at the time.

He also said that since Mr. Paul had organized the event, it was up to 
him to disclose the costs of the event to campaign officials. "It's 
their responsibility to report the contributions," he said.

As for the event itself, Mr. Rosen acknowledged that it was "great," as 
he put it. "But I still think I need therapy for having dealt with these 
guys," he said, referring to Mr. Paul and his associates.

Even Mr. Paul's former associate, Mr. Tonken, says he believes that Mr. 
Paul's accusations against the Clintons were an attempt to cut a deal 
with federal investigators looking into the financial improprieties at 
Stan Lee Media. "I know David Rosen personally and he is a good person," 
Mr. Tonken said. "Paul knew that he had to give up Mrs. Clinton to save 
himself."

But Mr. Paul, who said he was cooperating with investigators, is 
sticking to his story. "I came forward as soon as I found out that my 
contribution hadn't been reported at all," he said.


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10
 * Origin:  (1:226/600)