Text 9464, 106 rader
Skriven 2005-03-01 05:49:20 av John Hull (1:379/1.99)
   Kommentar till text 9459 av LEE LOFASO (1:123/140)
Ärende: If It Ain't Broke...
============================
28 Feb 05 18:21, LEE LOFASO wrote to JOHN HULL:

 LL> Hello John,

 >>JH>Perhaps you don't know that FDR intended to implement the same
 >>JH>sort of savings accounts that Bush is talking about.

 >>LL>Well, John, to be perfectly honest, I didn't know that.
 >>LL>So please fill me in.  IOW - Put up or shut up.

 >>LL>BTW, just because Britt Hume said so does not make it so.
 >>LL>And just because Newt Gingrich said so does not make it so.
 >>LL>And just because John Hull said so does not make it so.

 >>LL>Please show cites, where FDR said what you claim.  If you can.

 >>LL>Gosh.  I love this "put up or shut up" rule.  :)

 >>JH>Tell you what, Lee.  When you post cites for some of the truly
 >>JH>outrageous stuff you've posted, I'll post cites for that.

 >>LL>I have opinions on just about everything.  Most, if not all, of my
 >>LL>opinions are based on fact.  What "truly outrageous stuff" you are
 >>LL>referring to I have no idea, since you failed to specify.  
 >>LL>However, it seems you have no basis in fact on which to base your 
 >>LL>wild opinion that FDR proposed a social security system similar to 
 >>LL>Bush's proposal. That why I have invoked the "put up or shut up" 
 >>LL>rule.

 JH>>You must think we're a bunch of rubes in here.

 LL> Put up or shut up, John.  Either you can qualify your above 
 LL> statement,
 LL> or you can't.  It's that simple.

 JH>>You've been caught with your pants down so many times I can't even
 JH>>hazard a guess.

 LL> Put up or shut up, John.  You made the statement saying "FDR 
 LL> intended to
 LL> implement the same sort of savings accounts that Bush is talking 
 LL> about."
 LL> Qualify your statement.  If you can.

 JH>>You've admitted in the past to posting shit that isn't true.

 LL> I have posted many opinions, on various topics.  Whether you and 
 LL> others
 LL> agree or disagree with those opinions is not my concern.

 JH>>Don't play dumb ass games with me on posting cites.

 LL> Put up or shut up, John.

 JH>>I've got the book in my hand that covers what I said.

 LL> Then put up or shut up.  Qualify your statement.  If you can.

 JH>>I wouldn't have written anything if it wasn't verifiable.

 LL> Then put up or shut up.  Qualify your statement.  If you can.

 >>JH>You ought to know by now that I do not lie, and I wouldn't post
 >>JH>something unless it was verifiable.

 >>LL>Then put up or shut up.

 >>JH>Btw, this is not the first time I've posted about it.

 >>LL>Oh, my.  In that case, that makes a second put up or shut up.  :)

 >>JH>I guess you missed it the first time, eh?

 >>LL>Then put up or shut up.  Failure to do so would be your admission
 >>LL>of being a bona fide liar.

 JH>>The only thing I'll admit is that you're nothing but a joke.

 LL> Put up or shut up.  Qualify your statement concerning FDR.
 LL> You can do it.  If you try.  Or maybe you can't.  In which case
 LL> I can easily understand your embarrassment.

 JH>>You're a bona fide jerk and I don't owe you anything, and neither
 JH>>does anybody else here.

 LL> Put up or shut up.  Qualify your statement.  If you can.

 JH>>You don't have enough credibility for me to waste my time giving
 JH>>cites for anything.

 LL> Put up or shut up, John.  Qualify your statement.  If you can.

 JH>>You are irrelevant.

 LL> Put up or shut up, John.  Qualify your statement concerning FDR.
 LL> If you can.

Not to you, asshole.  By the way, your record is stuck.

John 

America:  First, Last, and Always!
Go to www.madgorilla.us for all your Domain Name Services at the lowest rates.

--- Msged/386 TE 05
 * Origin: We are the Watchmen of our own Liberty! (1:379/1.99)