Text 9919, 155 rader
Skriven 2005-03-14 22:43:05 av Howie Coombe
     Kommentar till en text av Ed Hulett
Ärende: HAVE YOU SEEN CATCH 22 OR
=================================
Dear Ed, in regards to this message to Me.

 > Howie Coombe -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 > HC> Dear Ed, in regards to this bit of autopilot dribbling to Me.

 >  You hardly any sense with your reply and you think my reply is "autopilot  
> dribbling?"


When i am not on autopilot myself, which has been known to happen, i think i
make more sense then most any body here, certainly any of the Old Republicans
on this echo.

 > Yowza!


Agreed.

 >>> Howie Coombe -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 > HC>>> Dear Ed, in regards to this message to Vern Homphrey.

 >>>>> VERN HUMPHREY -> ED HULETT wrote:

 > VH>>>>>>> More incoherant mumbling, the gist of which was the caller rides

 > VH>>>>>>> Host: "So your solution to the problems of the world is we should

 > EH>>>>>> Hahahahaha! Things sound so simple to some until you turn it

 > VH>>>>> I was waiting for the host to say, "You could be twice as good, if

 >>>>> Heh heh...

 > HC>>> Aha.

 > HC> Not funny i dont think.

 > True,


So we have simmiler senses of humour.

 > you don't think.


I do more thinking then you do, as is evidenced by the fact that i am not the
one spitting bile here.

 > You don't make sense,


More blind bile, blind bile and blind patriotism is all i am seeming to get in
this place.

 > either.


I make sense to thinking people.

 >>>>> even better,

 > HC>>> Yes?.

 > HC> More Autopilot Dribbling?.

 > Replying to yourself now?


No, just adding to a message i wrote earlier.

 >>>>> if ya ride backward... :-)

 > HC>>> I am not sure who you are quoting but if it was thurston ackerman i

 >>> I'd suggest that if you don't know what the conversation is about to

 > HC> I Never hit Autopilot or The "Next" Key on any message in any thread

 > The conversation between Vern and I is *NOT* a thread started by you.


No but "Have you seen catch 22 or...." IS a thread started by me, in a message
to Thurston Ackerman, and as such any part there in that is in a public echo is
abled to be intercepted by me.

 >>> Better yet,

 > HC> IYO?.

 > Huh?


In Your Opinion, this whole message collection is negative opinion on your
part.

 >>> you contribute so little to this echo,

 > HC> IYO?.

 > In most everyone's opinion.


I am willing to bet there is at least 1 person here other then me who would beg
to differ, at anyrate luckily when it comes to peoples opinion on the quantity
of my contributions i dont give a shit.

 >>> why not just deselect it?

 > HC> Because i think i contribute plenty to this echo, maybe not in  

 >  No,


No?.

 > the echo is about *POLITICS*,


And this thread and or converstation is about?.

 > that's why it's called the FIDO POLITICS echo.


No Kidding, and this thread and or conversation is about?.

 > Gary Braswell is the *moderator* of this echo.


Yes i know this.

 > Not the subject.


Of this echo maybe, but he did seem to be the subject of both this thread and
this conversation.

 >>> Good grief!

 > HC> RBAY.

 >  Before you comment anymore,


Yes?.

 > please educate yourself about the subject of this discussion.


I Am sure you will be doing enough "educating" for both of us in the course of
the next message that you insisted on writing to me.

--- FLAME v2.0/b
 * Origin: Common Ground +61-8-8223-2131 - Telnet cg.dircsa.org.au (3:800/816)