Text 9962, 208 rader
Skriven 2005-03-16 23:23:06 av Ed Hulett (1:123/789.0)
     Kommentar till en text av Howie Coombe
Ärende: HAVE YOU SEEN CATCH 22 OR
=================================
Howie Coombe -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 HC> Dear Ed, in regards to this message to Me.

 >> Howie Coombe -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 HC>>> Dear Ed, in regards to this bit of autopilot dribbling to Me.

 >>  You hardly any sense with your reply and you think my reply is
 HC> "autopilot   > dribbling?"


 HC> When i am not on autopilot myself, which has been known to happen, i
 HC> think i make more sense then most any body here, certainly any of the
 HC> Old Republicans on this echo.

You are deluded. You very seldom make sense.

 >> Yowza!


 HC> Agreed.

Yowza!

 >>>> Howie Coombe -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 HC>>>>> Dear Ed, in regards to this message to Vern Homphrey.

 >>>>>> VERN HUMPHREY -> ED HULETT wrote:

 VH>>>>>>>>> More incoherant mumbling, the gist of which was the caller
 HC> rides

 VH>>>>>>>>> Host: "So your solution to the problems of the world is we
 HC> should

 EH>>>>>>>> Hahahahaha! Things sound so simple to some until you turn it

 VH>>>>>>> I was waiting for the host to say, "You could be twice as
 HC> good, if

 >>>>>> Heh heh...

 HC>>>>> Aha.

 HC>>> Not funny i dont think.

 >> True,


 HC> So we have simmiler senses of humour.

Huh?

 >> you don't think.


 HC> I do more thinking then you do, as is evidenced by the fact that i am
 HC> not the one spitting bile here.

Hahahahahahaha!!!!

What "bile" am I supposedly "spitting" here?

 >> You don't make sense,


 HC> More blind bile, blind bile and blind patriotism is all i am seeming to
 HC> get in this place.

Huh? Telling you that you don't make sense is "blind bile" in your opinion?
Amazing.

 >> either.


 HC> I make sense to thinking people.

Now who's spitting "blind bile?" Go0od grief!

 >>>>>> even better,

 HC>>>>> Yes?.

 HC>>> More Autopilot Dribbling?.

 >> Replying to yourself now?


 HC> No, just adding to a message i wrote earlier.

Huh?

You add "More Autopilot Dribbling?" after your own "Yes?" question and you call
it adding to a message? Interesting.

 >>>>>> if ya ride backward... :-)

 HC>>>>> I am not sure who you are quoting but if it was thurston
 HC> ackerman i

 >>>> I'd suggest that if you don't know what the conversation is about to

 HC>>> I Never hit Autopilot or The "Next" Key on any message in any thread

 >> The conversation between Vern and I is *NOT* a thread started by you.


 HC> No but "Have you seen catch 22 or...." IS a thread started by me, in a
 HC> message to Thurston Ackerman, and as such any part there in that is in a
 HC> public echo is abled to be intercepted by me.

The subject was started by you, but Vern and I were in a side conversation
under the same subject.

Good grief. You think that since you coined the subject line, that anything
under that subject is yours?

 >>>> Better yet,

 HC>>> IYO?.

 >> Huh?


 HC> In Your Opinion, this whole message collection is negative opinion on
 HC> your part.

Hahahahahahahaha!!!!

Unbelievable!

 >>>> you contribute so little to this echo,

 HC>>> IYO?.

 >> In most everyone's opinion.


 HC> I am willing to bet there is at least 1 person here other then me who
 HC> would beg to differ, at anyrate luckily when it comes to peoples opinion
 HC> on the quantity of my contributions i dont give a shit.

I can tell. You don't care about the quality, either.

 >>>> why not just deselect it?

 HC>>> Because i think i contribute plenty to this echo, maybe not in

 >>  No,


 HC> No?.

No. It's a rather simple 2 letter word. Easy to understand.

 >> the echo is about *POLITICS*,


 HC> And this thread and or converstation is about?.

Well, this particular conversation is about your inability to follow a thread.

 >> that's why it's called the FIDO POLITICS echo.


 HC> No Kidding, and this thread and or conversation is about?.

The original thread has expanded beyond just your narrow subject line. If you
can't keep up, don't blame me.

 >> Gary Braswell is the *moderator* of this echo.


 HC> Yes i know this.

Then, let him do his job and don't presume to own a subject line.

 >> Not the subject.


 HC> Of this echo maybe, but he did seem to be the subject of both this
 HC> thread and this conversation.

Really? Where'd you get that idea?

 >>>> Good grief!

 HC>>> RBAY.

 >>  Before you comment anymore,


 HC> Yes?.

 >> please educate yourself about the subject of this discussion.


 HC> I Am sure you will be doing enough "educating" for both of us in the
 HC> course of the next message that you insisted on writing to me.

I'm not the one who brought you into this conversation. You presumed to have
something to say to me. I have yet to read anything from you that makes sense.

Ed

--- Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
 * Origin:  (1:123/789.0)