Text 10316, 77 rader
Skriven 2009-03-17 06:33:41 av Dan Ceppa (1:138/666.0)
     Kommentar till en text av JOHN FITZGERALD
Ärende: MISSING WMD
===================
-> On 16 Mar 09  15:33:54, JOHN FITZGERALD got back to DAN CEPPA 
-> Re: MISSING WMD

 JF>  There are numerous incidents where inspectors were held up or
 JF>  restricted  so buildings could be cleared.
 
 DC>  Even if he was producing weapons, such moves disrupt
 DC>  any progress he's made towards reaquiring them.  

 JF> With the US and Allies getting set to come in and mop up it seems he
 JF> didn't have a whole lot of choice.
 
Allies?  The only one of note was the UK.  And, there were ther only because
Blair not only bought Bush's lies but helped create them.  


 DC>   You just don't pack such items up in a cardboard box 
 DC>   and move it in a U-Haul.  

 JF> Carboard box...U-Haul?  No.   With large trucks and an army at 
 JF> his disposal?  Yes.

And the evidence for that happening is where, exactly.  
 
 
 DC>   Further, such tactics make it easier to maintain 
 DC>   his myth that he still has them available. 

 JF> The only myth is the one that has convinced some individuals that 
 JF> Saddam was perfectly willing to roll over and throw years of research 
 JF> and production down the drain without a fight.

Hell, his own people were using him!  Much of what he thought was going on for
him was never happening.  His Mad Scientists were only collecting a pay check
for work undone.  


 
 
 
 DC>   Don't forget: He's well outmanned by his 
 DC>   chief rival and evemy, Iran.

 JF> Yes, which is why he wasn't about to roll over, destroy
 JF> everything,  and in front of credible witnesses no less.
 
Of course not.  

 DC>    He needs something to keep them off 
 DC>    of his back.  

 JF> CBW's were one such deterrent.
 
And he didn't have them.  Get over it.  MI6 knew it.  The CIA knew it.  Bush
and Blair ignored their own intelligency divisions in the rush to war.  

 DC>   Where's his evidence?  

 JF> Trucks were observed by numerous people, and events like this
 JF> occurred  often, again, in front of numerous inspection teams.

Are you trying to say that there aren't any satellite photos?  And.  do
rea;ozed that the prime eye witness source is a proven liar.  Further, what he
claimed he saw could not have happened as he related.  His testimony has been
shown without a shadow of a doubt to be absolutely false.  
 
 DC>  And the evidence that he had WMD in 2003 is????   

 JF> And the evidence that he did not have any WMD in 2003 is??  Saddam

John, it doesn't work that way.  It's up to you to provide the evodence.  Your
evasion of the same is a consession that you don't have any credible evidence
of the WMD that you claim.  


--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
 * Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:138/666.0)