Text 10415, 91 rader
Skriven 2009-03-20 06:38:46 av JOHN FITZGERALD (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av DAN CEPPA
Ärende: WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
==========================
-

 DC>   If someone puts a gun to your head to scare you and it 
 DC>   goes off and kills you, is the person inocent because 
 DC>   it was an accident?  

 JF> Under those circumstances the person wouldn't be guilty of murder.  
 JF> Hope this doesn't disappoint you.

DC>   Your take on the law disappoints me.  Like it or not, 
DC>   manslaughter is still murder.  The only difference is 
DC>   in the severity of the, punisment. 

  You should learn someday that a person is charged with murder when 
that person intends to kill someone and does so.  A person who gets 
into a fight and ends up killing someone is charged with manslaughter.  
If I punch someone in the nose and that person falls back, hits his head
and dies, that is manslaughter.  If they waterboard a perosn and he dies, 
that too would be manslaughter.  Not murder.  Sorry.  Take the witch hunt
somewhere else.

  Again, I asked you where you were getting your numbers from and all I 
get is your ignorant take on what is murder laws.  Obviously you don't 
have a credible source, just some phantom article I have yet to see.
Who do you really think you're kidding, Dan?


  
 JF>   Sorry, the real why is why you would defend 
 JF>   someone like Saddam.
 
 DC>   There you go again.  I have never defended him.  
 
 JF>   You haven't gone around and said he was a swell guy, okay, but
 JF>   you do try to dismiss or deny everything this individual was 
 JF>   up to in the years leading up to the '03 invasion.  

DC>   Bullshit again.  I never once claimed Saddam to be a saint.  
DC>   His only real saving grace is in that his regime acted as 
DC>   a buffer against Iran.  That's why the US, that's right, 
DC>   the United States, supported him up until Gulf War I. 

  Old news, so you can stop acting like you're revealing some hidden truth.
The US is not the first country to support someone who later became an 
enemy, nor will it be the last I suspect.



DC>    The fact is, John, he was a great ally of 
DC>    the US in that region until that point in time.  

   A "great ally"?  Hardly.  Just a tool to use against Iran.



 JF>   And all the things Clinton's  people reported on about 
 JF>   him and his affairs are dismissed out right buy most Democrats.
 JF>   Heck, Bob Klahn once said Clinton's people, for eight years, 
 JF>   were "all wrong" about Saddam.  Pew!
 
 DC>   So, they were wrong.

 JF> Another sweeping dismissal.  

DC>  It really is that simple, John.  They were wrong.

   Your assumption that all of these people were just hallucinating for 
eight years over Saddam is moronic.  Try selling it to someone who 
doesn't know any better.  When Democrats said he was a threat, what were 
they referring to?  His stock piles of Bug Spray?


JF>   So I guess the couple of times Saddam destroyed some of 
JF>   his WMD it was really just bug spray and fertilizer he 
JF>   was disposing of.  And when Clinton sent cruise missile 
JF>   into Baghdad, without a declaration of war, it was because 
JF>   Saddam was not the threat to security in the region 
JF>    everyone was claiming he was. 

DC>   What to you think many chemical weapons are made of?  
DC>   Wjat do you think Timothy McVie made his OKC bomb out of? 

  Chemicals, just like some of those Saddam had.  Are you trying to tell 
us Saddam was only capable of making McVeigh style truck bombs??  Ha! 




---
 *   *
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)