Text 10509, 85 rader
Skriven 2009-03-22 00:44:46 av Ross Sauer (1:123/789.0)
  Kommentar till text 10505 av Ross Cassell (1:123/456.0)
Ärende: WAR CRIMES??
====================
"Ross Cassell -> Ross Sauer" <1:123/456> wrote in
news:27652$POL_INC@JamNNTPd:

 RC>>> Excepting Clinton from the above list because we know where his
 RC>>> actions took place, did any of them do so in the Executive
 RC>   Workspace RC>> of the White House?

 RS>> We don't know.

 RC> Oh yes we do:

 RC> * November 15, 1995, in the private study of the Oval Office
 RC> * November 17, 1995, while Bill Clinton was on the phone with a member

 RC>    of Congress
 RC> * December 31, 1995, in a White House study
 RC> * January 7, 1996, in the Oval Office
 RC> * January 21, 1996, in the hallway by the private study next to the
 RC> Oval Office * February 4, 1996, while Clinton was meeting in Oval
 RC> Office * March 31, 1996, in the hallway near the study of the Oval
 RC> Office * February 28, 1997, near the Oval Office; this is when the
 RC> blue dress stains were created
 RC> * March 29, 1997 (Clinton denied that this day's encounter actually
 RC> happened)

You give a meaningless timeline, but nothing else.
I didn't need to see a re-hashing of what belongs on the Howard Stern
show.

 RS>> And you chopped off my point.
 RS>> That outside of salicious headlines and pervert political
 RC>   opponents and RS> headline-hungry "special prosecutors," it has
 RC>   nothing to do with any of RS> us.
 RS>> Their actual spouses, yes.

 RC> I might agree with you had the above not occurred in the executive
 RC> workspace.

 RC> The US President, cannot go slinking off in the name of "working late"
 RC> in order to carry on a extra-marital affair, like the average no name
 RC> Joe can, meaning the no-name Joe can keep it a secret.

 RC> Clinton of all people had no business messing with Lewinsky especially
 RC> since similiar allegations against him, nearly torpedoed his 92
 RC> campaign.

 RC> and yes Mr Sauer, sexual daliances do matter, at least those committed
 RC> in  candidates recent past, witness Clintons near torpedo miss in 92
 RC> and Gary Harts 1988 experiences.

Like I said, only perverts and partisans.

 RC>>> Where exactly in the White House do you deem it most
 RC>   appropriate for RC>> the US President to insert a Cigar into the
 RC>   Vagina of a White House RC>> Intern or to jack off on her dress?

 RS>> I don't give a shit.
 RS>> Only perverts and partisans do.

 RC> So the Oval Office is acceptable, how about the East Room?

AGAIN, who the fuck CARES??!!??

The last election, you (yes, YOU,) supported a guy who screwed around on
his crippled wife, and then married a gorgeous and RICH blonde, who
couldn't keep her hands out of other people's narcotic medications.

But that isn't why most people rejected McCain.
They rejected McCain because he was McBush.

 RC>>> or one that fires a bunch of cruise missiles at an aspirin
 RC>   factory to RC>> divert attention away from his sex scandal?

 RS>> Is that why he fired the cruise missiles?
 RS>> I know it makes great partisan gossip, but is it true?
 RS>> If so, prove it.

 RC> The timing was mysterious enough, but like Roswell, we will never
 RC> know.. <G>

Roswell was a then top-secret balloon system for detecting Russian
nuclear explosions.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
 * Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)