Text 10645, 177 rader
Skriven 2009-03-24 10:40:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROSS SAUER
Ärende: SHLEMIELS ON THE SAME BUS
=================================
On 03-24-09, ROSS SAUER said to TIM RICHARDSON:



TR> The democrat `dirt-digging' squad got busy on Palin almost before her
TR> acceptance speech was finished. It wasn't more than a day or so before
TR> stuff started being publically nosed about:


RS>People will gossip.


RS>You know that as well as I do.


So.....that excuses it then.....`people will gossip'!


RS>Where was all your outrage when conservative groups were saying they had
RS>a tape of Michelle Obama making a anti-American speech?


I wasn't paying attention to Hussein's wife much. But some of the things she
said in speeches were cause for concern of where exactly her loyalties were.


RS>(Which never did come out, BTW)


TR> The child wasn't hers it was her daughters, and she was just covering
TR> for her;


RS>It was Palin's own actions the day of the delivery that fueled those
RS>rumors.


Thats the silliest excuse for slinging dirt at someone I've seen in a long
time.


On the day of delivery of a grand-daughter, if the grandmother blows her
nose.. ...does that make her a slob? After all.........its her `own actions'.


TR> She'd had an affair with some friend of her husband;


RS>And...?


It turned out to be a bald-faced lie, made up out of rage at Palin being the
vice-president pick of the republicans.



RS>How many wild rumors are you bozos *STILL* flying around about Obama?
RS>Secret Muslim, not a US citizen, etc.


First of all, in my years of watching political campaigns and their aftermath
come and go, one thing I've learned is, when there is deliberate effort on the
part of an individual to avoid putting information out in the public sector to
be carefully scrutinized by all.......something is seriously amiss.



TR> Her daughter was pregnant and wasn't married; (which, by the way, was
TR> true, but none of anyone's business, and certainly not a political
TR> issue.)


RS>Palin *HERSELF* made it an issue, by trotting out her pregnant daughter.


She did no such thing. She did what pretty well every presidential and vice-
presidential candidate has done for many, many election cycles since I was
born: introducing their immediately family, and\or having the immediate family
members present and onstage with them at the beginning of a campaign.


Nothing new about it. Nothing nefarious about it.


I could understand if Palin had maybe individually introduced her daughter by;
`and this is my daughter, who is pregnant-but-unmarried'....or some such. But
she didn't.


And before you toss in that `well...in her own life'.....etc etc about her
daughter being pregnant and unmarried. know this:


Parents raise their children and can only give them moral and social guidance
as the children grow.


At some point, the child is going to make their own choices in various areas,
and the parent can only give the best support they can without ceasing to love
that child.


When Sarah Palin's daughter was pregnant and un-married, the many thousands of
young girls in the US who were pregnant and un-married for that same year
probably numbered in the thousands! Un-wed pregnancies have become almost an
ingrained situation in American society, and for years now we have been
hammered by the `socialists' with the `its between a woman and her doctor...;!


The biggest problem the democrat mud-slinging had over it was the girl hadn't
chosen to have an abortion.



TR> And on and on and on.



TR> If one of Hussein Obama's daughters been pregnant and unmarried, not
TR> one word would have been uttered about it.


RS>Bullshit.


RS>Were any of Bill Clinton's antics "covered up?"


`Psssst! (nudge nudge) stage whisper: Bill Clinton ain't the fuckin' president
anymore....that was two administrations ago! Time to move on.



RS>Or was any and every rumor, no matter how wild, run with?
RS>Easy answer: The latter.


RS>Your "outrage" here is as phony and hypocritical as it can get.


Your attempt to scare up your usual lynch mob is noted (snicker!) and ignored.


By the way.....there was no outrage on my part. Ackley and I were just
talking.....no need for you to inject something into it that isn't there. You
can put your rope away now, it isn't needed.


TR> Palin didn't deserve the filth that came her way for no other reason
TR> than she was running on the republican ticket.


RS>Palin brought it on herself.


She did no such thing.


RS>Now? She's back to "playing the victim," since her lawyers in that
RS>"Troopergate" investigation want to get paid.
RS>And naturally, Palin is asking for donations from the suckers.


(Yawn) Sounds like some sort of `politics....Alaska-brand. No concern of mine.
(Or yours, for that matter.) Whatever the situation there on this particular
issue, its outcome one way or the other will have no effect on me here in
sunny, Southern California....or on you, up there in Nowheresville, Wisconsin.







---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)