Text 13856, 146 rader
Skriven 2010-06-16 19:18:00 av Bob Klahn (1:124/311)
     Kommentar till en text av Ross Cassell
Ärende: Real Names
==================
 BK>>  You may well be wrong.

 BK>>  If I went deeply into my beliefs on these subjects you might
 BK>>  well be even more infuriated. As a small sample, I really do
 BK>>  believe Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Feith and the rest of the
 BK>>  Cabal that got us into Iraq should stand trial on 4000 counts of
 BK>>  murder in the death of the US military who died there. Then turn
 BK>>  them over to our allies who had people who died there.

 BK>>  They really should.

 RC> Well, I believe that all liberal democrats, should be
 RC> rounded up, sent to an isolated pacific atoll and have a
 RC> couple nukes dropped onto them.. hmmm.

 See... I only wanted to take out the right wingers who got
 thousands of Americans killed. You want to kill everyone who
 disagrees with you.

 Evil is on the side of the one who doesn't want to live under a
 system of real justice. (Hint: That's you.)

 RC>>> You will disagree with my assessment of the method of
 RC>>> communication being the poorest venue, because disagreeing
 RC>>> with everyone is what you do best.. ;-) (again an observed
 RC>>> perception in this particular venue)

 BK>>  I am not even sure of what you are saying. Nor do I see the
 BK>>  point of the method of communication on this issue.

 RC> Then you should sue the education system that spewed you
 RC> into the world, they forgot to endow you with the ability
 RC> to comprehend.

 Your educational system forgot to endow you with the ability to
 communicate clearly.

 RC> Unlike in person communications where one can decipher tone
 RC> of voice, facial expressions and body language, or at
 RC> minimum via voice communication where tone of voice can be
 RC> interpreted, the written forum is absent all of that.

 Which, to a certain extent, makes it superior. First because in
 person you don't have the time to consider and research your
 position before posting. Secondly, because the distraction of
 interpreting the body language and facial expressions can
 distract from the analysis of what is actually said.

 The snake oil salesman depends on your belief in him, not in his
 facts or science.

 RC>>> What you deem as most desirable is that everything be as
 RC>>> portrayed in Mister Roger's neighborhood and that everyone
 RC>>> vote hyphen-d.

 BK>>  Which is so obviously unrelated to the point in question as to
 BK>>  be an obvious diversion and distraction. You do that a lot.

 RC> So you say, perhaps you just want to be obstinant?

 You defend your evasion with another evasion.

 RC>>> He would not have *ever* received the grief he has, as
 RC>>> pertaining to the buttons he provided.

 BK>>  That has zero effect on the fact that *YOU* consider revealing
 BK>>  that information as providing a weapon. I know enough about you
 BK>>  to do much the same to you.

 RC> Whatever info I have provided have not gone into the realm
 RC> of intimate details, nor have those details been
 RC> embellished.

 But there is enough.

 RC>>>>> Sauer did.

 BK>>>>  Mine is on my website. Not linked, but there.

 RC>>> Whatever for?

 BK>>  So, if I chose, I can give the URL to someone to prove I did
 BK>>  serve.

 RC> Why, I believe you when you say you served when/where/how
 RC> you served.

 Sometimes I challenge others on their service. When you
 challenge another it is appropriate to be prepared to defend
 your own record.

 RC> Then again, I never have seen you embellish your service.

 Honorable service. No heroics, but few truly have such in their
 history.

 RC> The problem here is Sauer let himself be goaded into
 RC> sending a reproduction of his DD214 to someone he had been
 ...
 RC> DD214. One of my bosses was a weapons mechanic in the USAF,
 RC> for the F16, he said that 65 days in the USAF, 42 being
 RC> basic training, would not have come close to meeting the
 RC> boasts Sauer had made.

 From what I have seen of it, I could explain to your former boss
 how it would be possible, but not to you.

 RC> Another story, relating on how funny
 RC> he thought a F15 crash was, only speaks volumes to his
 RC> character.

 I believe he said no one was injured. So, what is the problem?

 What speaks volumes to character is not opposing those who have
 spewed venom over many here who had done nothing wrong but
 disagree with them.

 RC> I was in the very echo when he made his weapons mechanic
 ...
 RC> facts the two were discussing and correcting each other on
 RC> were the color paint used, calibre and make up of the ammo
 RC> used in the primary weapon. Raymond served in the US Army
 RC> and worked in military intelligence in the Pentagon.

 I'll bet it has flown with multiple colors.

 I don't recall what all different weapons it is capable of
 carrying.

 RC> What Sauer should have done was say piss on those whom dont
 RC> believe he served, without the DD214 he so readily
 RC> produced, he could have made himself out to be anything and
 RC> there would have been far less to refute it.

 True, and irrelevant to the question of why you consider
 revealing that a weapon.

 Speaks volumes about your character.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn@sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Kerry doesn't have to prove his manhood with the blood of other men.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311)