Text 2853, 704 rader
Skriven 2006-10-10 06:20:00 av ROSS SAUER (1:123/140)
Ärende: Top Ten, 9-9
====================
Like I said, some weeks they make it SOOOO easy...
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 263
October 9, 2006
Foley Loaded Edition
It's true that there are other things going on in the world right now,
but it's not every day that a GOP congressman is caught sending
pornographic messages to underage boys, causing a controversy which
could bring down the entire Republican leadership less than thirty days
before the mid-term elections, is it? There were so many conservative
idiots last week that I couldn't possibly narrow them down to ten,
therefore I'm dedicating this week's entire column to developments in
the Masturgate scandal. "Best of the Rest" follows at the end. Enjoy,
and don't forget the key!
Win Lunch With Mark Foley
Let's start where we left off last week, on Sunday October 1. After it
was revealed that Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) had exchanged lewd instant
messages and virtual bodily fluids with at least one former
congressional page, news broke that GOP leaders - including Rep. Rodney
Alexander, Majority Leader John Boehner, Rep. Tom Reynolds, and Speaker
Dennis Hastert - had known about Foley's penchant for jailbait for quite
some time (see Idiots 262).
But more was to come... much, much more. First it was revealed that
Foley had made an unusually large contribution of $100,000 to the NRCC
in July of 2006. The NRCC happens to be chaired by none other than Tom
Reynolds, who, according to the Associated Press, was informed of
Foley's behavior "sometime this spring." Hmm. So he was informed of the
allegations against Foley, and then Foley gave him $100,000? Must be a
coincidence.
Did anyone else lend a helping hand to Foley after they knew he was
trolling for teenage booty on the Internet? Hey, the GOP ain't the party
of "morals and values" for nothing. Take Rep. John Shimkus, the
Republican head of the Page Board, for example. First ABC News dropped
the bombshell that "GOP House staff warned the page class of 2001-2002
to stay away from ex-Rep. Mark Foley," according to AmericaBlog, yet in
the summer of 2002 Shimkus stood up at the page's farewell ceremony and
said:
I thank my colleague. Now someone who spends a lot of time with you
also, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Foley), would like to say a thank
you.
So let me get this straight... they wanted the page class of 2001-2002
to stay away from Foley, but he ended up spending "a lot of time" with
them anyway? Way to protect the kids.
And if you think that's bad, check this out - AmericaBlog also reports
that Shimkus approved of a contest among pages in which the highest
bidder would win a private lunch with Mark Foley. Here's Foley speaking
at the same farewell ceremony as Shimkus:
Maybe you all do not know this story, but John had paid considerable
sums to dine with me. I had offered to take the winning bidder to lunch
in the Members' dining room. Then I heard how much John Eunice paid. And
I said, "John, there is no way in the world after you committed so much
money to have lunch with me that I would dare take you downstairs to eat
in the Members' dining room." I said, "Where do you want to go?" He
says, without reservation, "Morton's." I said, "Morton's? Like in
Morton's Steakhouse?" He said, "Oh, would that be too much?" I said,
"Oh, no, we'll go." I said, "Call your mother, get permission, make sure
she notifies the Clerk and we will go to Morton's." And so we proceeded
to cruise down in my BMW to Morton's.
That's right - after telling the page class to stay away from Foley,
Shimkus and the Clerk of the House, Jeff Trandahl, gave four thumbs up
to Foley getting some quality alone time with one of their charges.
'Taint What You Do, It's The Way That You Do It
Monday morning began with a delightful headline from Bloomberg News:
"Republican Lawmakers Scramble to Avoid Taint of House Scandal." Just
put those words together and roll them around in your brain.
Republican... Scramble... Taint... Scandal... ah, it's like a breath of
fresh air.
And then, faster than you could say "love to slip them off of you," Mark
Foley disappeared into rehab.
It turns out that rehab is very popular among conservatives these days -
not long ago Rush Limbaugh went in for his chronic addiction to
prescription painkillers (after getting caught illegally procuring said
painkillers), and Rep. Bob Ney went in recently saying, "I have gone
through a great deal of soul searching recently, and I have come to
recognize that a dependence on alcohol has been a problem for me. I am
not making any excuses, and I take full responsibility for my actions."
Ney had just pleaded guilty to conspiracy and making false statements.
(See Idiots 260.)
Yes, if you're a conservative who gets caught doing the wrong thing,
rehab is the place to be. Isn't it obvious that Mark Foley only came on
to underage congressional pages because he was shitfaced? Don't we all
do that? Haven't you seen the beer commercials these days?
But it turns out that the bottle isn't entirely to blame - in fact, it
isn't to blame at all. Through his attorney, Foley took full
responsibility and "continues to offer no excuse whatsoever for his
conduct," as you can clearly tell from his attorney's press conference:
Mark explicitly reaffirms his acceptance of responsibility and remorse.
He reiterates unequivocally that he has never had sexual contact with a
minor. Mark voluntarily entered a substance abuse and mental health
facility on Sunday at approximately midnight eastern time. I was there,
and he will be there for at least 30 days.
This decision was Mark's, as was his decision to resign from the United
States House of Representatives. This was a life decision, not a
tactical one, made by others. Mark does not blame the trauma he
sustained as a young adolescent, for his totally inappropriate emails
and IMs. He continues to offer no excuse whatsoever for his conduct.
As is so often the case with victims of abuse, Mark advises that he kept
his shame to himself for almost forty years. Specifically Mark has asked
that you be told that between the ages of 13 and 15, he was molested by
a clergyman. Mark will address this issue further upon his release from
treatment. He very much wanted to release the name of the individual,
the church affiliation, and other details, but was advised by civil
counsel to delay that decision, pending his completion of treatment
after Mark has had an opportunity to consult with counsel.
Mark has also asked me on his behalf to thank the literally thousands of
ordinary citizens, as well as friends and others who have conveyed their
prayers, love, and best wishes to him. Finally, Mark Foley wants you to
know that he is a gay man.
See? No excuses whatsoever. Apart from the booze. And the mental
problems. And being the victim of a child molester. (And yes, I fully
understand that child molesters are often molested themselves as
children, but wasn't this all supposed to be about taking responsibility
and not making excuses?) Oh, and by the way, he's a gay man. Whatever
that has to do with anything.
Changing The Clin-Tone
But suddenly it became clear that the GOP wasn't going to take this
lying down (or hunched over a computer with their pants around their
ankles). For example, conservative commentators like Brit Hume had
already started bringing up the dreaded Clenis:
Hume said that while Foley is now "in total disgrace in his party,"
Clinton's "inappropriate behavior toward a subordinate (didn't) even
cost Bill Clinton his standing in his party."
Hmm, a subordinate, eh? Why, that almost makes it sound as if then-
college graduate Monica Lewinsky is somehow the equivalent of a 16-year-
old congressional page. How fair and balanced.
Meanwhile, White House press secretary Tony Snow was doing his best to
downplay the scandal:
Look, I hate to tell you, but it's not always pretty up there on Capitol
Hill and there have been other scandals as you know that have been more
than simply naughty e-mails.
Hmm, naughty emails, eh? Like...
Maf54 (8:03:47 PM) : what you wearing
Xxxxxxxxx (8:04:04 PM) : normal clothes
Xxxxxxxxx (8:04:09 PM) : tshirt and shorts
Maf54 (8:04:17 PM) : um so a big buldge.
Xxxxxxxxx (8:04:35 PM) : ya
Maf54 (8:04:45 PM) : um
Maf54 (8:04:58 PM) : love to slip them off of you
Xxxxxxxxx (8:05:08 PM) : haha
Maf54 (8:05:53 PM) : and gram the one eyed snake
Maf54 (8:06:13 PM) : grab
Xxxxxxxxx (8:06:53 PM) : not tonight...dont get to excited
Maf54 (8:07:12 PM) : well your hard
Xxxxxxxxx (8:07:45 PM) : that is true
Maf54 (8:08:03 PM) : and a little horny
Xxxxxxxxx (8:08:11 PM) : and also tru
Maf54 (8:08:31 PM) : get a ruler and measure it for me
Just your everyday naughty emails between a 52-year-old congressman and
a 16-year-old page, I guess.
Won't Somebody Think Of The Congressmen?
Unfortunately throwing Monica Lewinsky's name around didn't seem to be
working, nor did trying to downplay the scandal as "just a bit of fun."
No, it was time for the politicians involved to face the media and
explain themselves.
First up was Tom Reynolds, who held a press conference on Monday evening
to talk in detail about the charges. Well, in as much detail as he
could, given that he was surrounded by the children of supporters, and
therefore couldn't get into the salacious nature of the emails and
instant messages - sorry.
How brave of him.
Meanwhile, Internet shit-stirrer Matt Drudge had plans of his own. On
Monday afternoon he attempted a bold but not unfamiliar maneuver: blame
the victims. From his radio show:
And if anything, these kids are less innocent - these 16 and 17 year-old
beasts... and I've seen what they're doing on YouTube and I've seen what
they're doing all over the internet - oh yeah - you just have to tune
into any part of their pop culture. You're not going to tell me these
are innocent babies. Have you read the transcripts that ABC posted going
into the weekend of these instant messages, back and forth? The kids are
egging the Congressman on! The kids are trying to get this out of him.
We haven't got the whole story on this.
That's right folks: Foley's 16- and 17-year-old victims are, according
to Matt Drudge, "beasts" who egged him on. Isn't it obvious that Mark
Foley is the real victim here? You can tell from this Washington Post
report that Foley was clearly not in control of these situations:
Often implicit in the chats is an exchange of professional advancement
in exchange for sex that plays on the allure of power that Foley used to
entice one of the teenagers. Foley at one point promised to help him
become the "stylish elite type" person the teenager said he wanted to
be.
"We will make you successful," Foley promised, "as long as you don't
mind me grabbing your (deleted) once in a while."
See how those beasts were egging him on?
Back at the White House, Tony Snow attempted to head off further
criticism by playing the politics card. According to JABBS:
White House press secretary Tony Snow, asked about disgraced former Rep.
Mark Foley (R-FL) on ABC's Good Morning America, said he considered it
unfortunate that "people are thinking, 'OK, can I get political
advantage out of this'."
In a Pivotal Year, GOP Plans to Get Personal
Republicans are planning to spend the vast majority of their sizable
financial war chest over the final 60 days of the campaign attacking
Democratic House and Senate candidates over personal issues and local
controversies, GOP officials said.
The National Republican Congressional Committee, which this year
dispatched a half-dozen operatives to comb through tax, court and other
records looking for damaging information on Democratic candidates, plans
to spend more than 90 percent of its $50 million-plus advertising budget
on what officials described as negative ads.
(snip)
Because challengers tend to be little-known compared with incumbents,
they are more vulnerable to having their public image framed by the
opposition through attacks and unflattering personal revelations.
And with polls showing the Republicans' House and Senate majorities in
jeopardy, party strategists said they have concluded that their best
chance to prevent big Democratic gains is a television and direct-mail
blitz over the next eight weeks aimed at raising enough questions about
Democratic candidates that voters decide they are unacceptable choices.
Moving on...
Batshit Crazy
There was just one problem with the conservative strategy of blaming the
victim and chiding the Democrats for "playing politics" - the most
severe flak was being thrown up by Republicans. Again, according to
JABBS:
Three prominent conservatives suggested yesterday that House Speaker
Dennis Hastert (R-IL) failed miserably as a leader in not being
proactive in dealing with disgraced former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL).
First, talk show host Michael Reagan and Citizens United President David
Bossie called on Hastert to resign immediately for covering up Foley's
inappropriate behavior.
"Speaker Hastert had knowledge of Congressman Foley's inappropriate
behavior and chose to protect a potential pedophile and powerful
colleague over a congressional page," Bossie wrote in a press release.
"This inaction demonstrates a lack of leadership on Speaker Hastert's
part, and calls into question both his judgment and character. If
Speaker Hastert was willing to sacrifice a child to protect Rep. Foley's
seat and his own leadership position, then he surely does not share our
American and conservative values."
In the same release, Reagan says: "Any member of Congress who was aware
of the sexual emails and protected the congressman should also resign
effective immediately."
Ouch. With new revelations that pages were first warned about Foley in
1995, Speaker Dennis Hastert was suddenly fighting for his political
life. And apparently the way that Dennis Hastert fights for his
political life is to go batshit crazy all over right-wing talk radio.
Here he is talking to Rush Limbaugh:
There were two pieces of paper out there, one that we knew about and we
acted on; one that happened in 2003 we didn't know about, but somebody
had it, and, you know, they’re trying - and they drop it the last day of
the session, you know, before we adjourn on an election year. Now, we
took care of Mr. Foley. We found out about it, asked him to resign. He
did resign. He's gone. We asked for an investigation. We've done that.
We're trying to build better protections for these page programs.
But, you know, this is a political issue in itself, too, and what we've
tried to do as the Republican Party is make a better economy, protect
this country against terrorism - and we've worked at it ever since 9/11,
worked with the president on it - and there are some people that try to
tear us down. We are the insulation to protect this country, and if they
get to me it looks like they could affect our election as well.
We are the insulation to protect this country? To be fair, Hastert
clearly knows a lot about insulation.
What Did The Democrats Know And When Did They Know It?
It was time for the Republicans' third line of attack: blame the
Democrats. You see, despite the fact that Foley was a Republican, and
that the Republican leadership knew about his proclivities for years and
didn't tell the Democrats about it, Hastert had no choice but to make
wild accusations that the Dems were somehow responsible for this fiasco.
After all, Denny had already done everything he possibly could to make
sure that Foley wouldn't hit on congressional pages:
Hastert said Republican leaders were informed of the e-mails and
resolved the situation.
"We went to Foley, told him to stand down, don't do this," Hastert said.
"We asked him if there was any sexually explicit language in this
message, and there was not."
"We went to Foley, confronted him," Hastert said, adding that Foley said
"he wouldn't do it anymore."
Well done. Meanwhile, other batshit crazy Republicans were jumping on
board Hastert's "blame the Dems" bandwagon - although given what Hastert
just said about Foley, Katherine Harris might have gone a bit overboard
with the spin:
In an interview with WESH Channel 2 in Orlando, Harris said, "if
anything, the Republicans didn't know about these issues and we're going
to be very anxious to find out who in the media and on the other side of
the aisle knew about it and kept this from the public interest, because
our children were at stake."
It's even funnier when you consider that Katherine Harris couldn't even
get an endorsement from Foley:
In the U.S. Senate primary, Rep. Katherine Harris has been touting key
political endorsements from fellow Republican lawmakers. The problem is,
some of them never endorsed her.
Several members of the U.S. House called the Harris campaign to complain
Wednesday after the St. Petersburg Times notified them of the
endorsements listed on Harris' Web site. Minutes later, their names were
removed.
The list of politicians whose names came down includes Reps. Ginny Brown-
Waite of Brooksville, Cliff Stearns of Ocala, Mark Foley of West Palm
Beach and Jeff Miller of the Panhandle.
Wow, dissed by a child predator. How humiliating.
No, Wait, Blame The Gays
Blaming the Democrats didn't seem to be working out too well, so
Republican commentators went back to their favorite target: gays. From
Think Progress:
Ben Stein, American Spectator:
On the one hand, we have a poor misguided Republican man who had a
romantic thing for young boys. He sent them suggestive e-mail. I agree,
that's not great. ... I hope it won't come as a surprise to anyone that
a big part of male homosexual behavior is interest in young boys.
Linda Harvey, WorldNetDaily:
Open or suspected homosexuals should never be elected. The problem with
homosexuals is that they frequently don't have common sense and don't
acknowledge appropriate boundaries. Weird sex, public displays of
"affection" and nudity, and sex with youth are built into the "gay" sub-
culture.
Tammy Bruce, political analyst:
All I want, frankly, is a gay person in office who is not a sexual
compulsive. I mean, is that too much to ask for?
Because as we all know, heterosexual men never ever prey on children.
Rock The Vote
Unfortunately for Republicans, the damaging revelations weren't quite
done yet. Foley's attorney had already claimed that Foley was "under the
influence of alcohol at the time he sent the alleged e-mails and IMs
that I have been informed of," and that he was "never under the
influence of alcohol while conducting business on Capitol Hill,"
according to the Associated Press.
So how does he explain this?
Foley engaged in internet sex with the boys, at one point even leaving
the floor during a vote for a joint masturbation session with a minor
using an instant message exchange system.
According to the transcripts of the numerous lurid exchanges published
by US television network ABC, Foley, under the screen name Maf54, and
the teen describe having orgasms. Then:
Maf54: Ok ... i better go vote ... did you know you would have this
effect on me
Teen: lol I guessed
Teen: ya go vote I don't want to keep you from doing our job
Maf54: can I have a good kiss goodnight
Teen: :-* <kiss>
I guess he must have just sobered up really quickly. Or something.
But thank god for Fox News. If it weren't for them, you never would have
found out the real truth about Mark Foley:
That's right - despite all evidence to the contrary, it turns out that
Foley is really a Democrat! Well played.
The Associated Press did this too, although they had the decency to
offer a correction almost immediately. As for Fox News, well, as Bill
O'Reilly's executive producer David Tabacoff explained, "We didn't run a
correction per se."
Whining City On A Hill
For two days, conservatives had been in a full-on snit trying to pin the
Mark Foley scandal on the Democrats. But Wednesday morning brought news
that would throw cold water all over that plan. According to The Hill:
The source who in July gave news media Rep. Mark Foley's (R-Fla.)
suspect e-mails to a former House page says the documents came to him
from a House GOP aide.
That aide has been a registered Republican since becoming eligible to
vote, said the source, who showed The Hill public records supporting his
claim.
The same source, who acted as an intermediary between the aide-turned-
whistleblower and several news outlets, says the person who shared the
documents is no longer employed in the House.
But the whistleblower was a paid GOP staffer when the documents were
first given to the media.
Oh well.
Have You Driven Out A Fordham Lately?
Meanwhile, things were looking grim for Denny-boy. As Republicans tried
desperately to swat away allegations that the GOP leadership had covered
for a child predator in the halls of Congress, this happened:
Rep. Tom Reynolds was embroiled again Tuesday by reports that his chief
of staff tried to persuade ABC News not to report the most sexually
explicit computer messages between former Rep. Mark Foley of Florida and
teenage congressional pages.
Democratic Party officials in New York charged that aide Kirk Fordham, a
Greece native, tried to limit the scandal involving Foley, for whom he
once was chief of staff.
Fordham called that assertion "absurd" and said he was just trying to
spare Foley's sister, Donna, and his ailing parents.
But within hours, Fordham was gone. According to ABC News:
The chief of staff for Republican Congressman Tom Reynolds, Kirk
Fordham, resigned after questions were raised about his role in the
handling of the congressional page scandal, according to Republican
sources on Capitol Hill.
Those sources said Fordham, a former chief of staff for Congressman Mark
Foley, had urged Republican leaders last spring not to raise
questionable Foley e-mails with the full Congressional Page Board, made
up of two Republicans and a Democrat.
"He begged them not to tell the page board," said one of the Republican
sources.
Not that this news stopped Laura Bush from dropping in on the embattled
Reynolds campaign for a spot of fundraising:
Ladies and gentlemen, he loves to sweep child predators under the rug, I
give you Tom Reynolds!
Unfortunately, Kirk Fordham wasn't going to go quietly. According to the
Associated Press:
A senior congressional aide said Wednesday that he alerted House Speaker
Dennis Hastert's office two years ago about worrisome conduct by former
Rep. Mark Foley with teenage pages.
Kirk Fordham told The Associated Press that when he was told about
Foley's inappropriate behavior toward pages, he had "more than one
conversation with senior staff at the highest level of the House of
Representatives asking them to intervene."
The conversations took place long before the e-mail scandal broke,
Fordham said, and at least a year earlier than members of the House GOP
leadership have acknowledged.
Yipes.
With their leadership in the hot seat, Republicans needed a plan - and
fast. Both Tom Reynolds and House Majority Leader John Boehner had
already blabbed to the press that Hastert knew about the allegations a
long time ago, and Hastert's position looked tenuous. But there was a
problem - if Hastert quit, there would have to be a leadership contest.
The obvious choice would be John Boehner, who was already up to his neck
in the Foley scandal. It wouldn't take much for some enterprising young
GOP congressman who fancied a shot at the Speaker's chair to ruin
Boehner's chances by using the Foley scandal against him, and that would
cause a massive rift in the Republican party while they fought it out
amongst themselves - with only a month to go before the elections, no
less. Are you having fun yet?
Hastert had already offered to resign: according to Paul Weyrich, "He
said if he thought that resigning would be helpful to the Republicans
maintaining the majority, he would do it." Makes sense - Hastert
wouldn't resign because it was the right thing to do, but he'd do it if
it would help Republicans retain control of the House. Now who's playing
politics?
Meanwhile, in a compelling fit of minimalism, the Speaker's office put
out the shortest press release of all time:
What Kirk Fordham said did not happen.
The Blame Game
By Thursday afternoon, the Republicans were forced into doing the only
thing they could possibly do under the circumstances - rally around
Hastert and try to, er, ride the scandal out. Hastert gave a press
conference on Thursday to let everyone know that he wasn't going to
quit, but he did take full responsibility for what had happened.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert apologized and took responsibility on
Thursday for the unfolding page sex scandal involving fellow Republican
Mark Foley.
"I'm deeply sorry this has happened and the bottom line is we're taking
responsibility," Hastert said at a news conference outside his district
office in Batavia, Ill.
"Ultimately, the buck stops here," the speaker said.
So there you have it. Hastert is deeply sorry. He's taking
responsibility. And the bottom line is that the buck stops here.
Hastert also promised to hold investigations into the scandal, which was
very nice of him. "What did I know and when did I know it," that sort of
thing. As soon as the investigations were announced, Republicans
immediately fell all over themselves to take responsibility and stop the
buck:
North Carolina Republican Rep. Patrick McHenry called on Democratic
leaders yesterday to testify under oath about when they knew of former
Rep. Mark Foley's (R-Fla.) Internet communications with a House page.
Oh, for crying out loud.
By the way, did I mention that Hastert's Grand Taking Of Responsibility
came after he'd already tried the Kenny Boy Defense? "I've never had a
conversation with him (Foley)," Hastert said last week, "other than his
vote on a tariff matter at one time or another, I think."
Yeah, looks like you barely knew the guy, Denny.
By the end of the day, Republican commentators found themselves cycling
back around to Bill Clinton (and George Soros), while Drudge completely
lost the plot and began yelling that the instant messages were a prank
gone bad. For a split second it almost looked like they were on the
verge of catapulting the propaganda and turning the corner - right up
until AmericaBlog noted that:
Tonight on CNN, Paula Zahn asked Dana Bash about Hastert's allegations
that Democrats and ABC News were somehow to blame for the Foley
Republican child predator scandal:
Zahn: Is there any proof of that?
Bash: No, there isn't any proof of that. The Speaker's office is saying
they haven't been able to back that up.
They can't back it up because it's not true. Their boss lied. And, the
Speaker's office admitted it.
The Buck Stops... Where?
Surely there must be some brave soul out there willing to stand up and
defend these poor Republicans and their gigantic child predator coverup?
Lieberman continues attacking critics of sexual predator cover up
No really, this is not a joke. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you
Joe Lieberman's comments from today in Torrington about the scandal, in
which he reiterates his earlier attacks on Ned Lamont and others for
calling for Hastert's immediate resignation in the wake of the sexual
predator scandal:
"Right now I'd say this thing is spinning out of control, it's become
another partisan frenzy in Washington, that's the wrong way to go at
it."
Way to go, Joe.
The week was capped off with Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Obviously) calling the
pages "precocious" and saying, "Frankly, this is the responsibility of
the parents," while Tom Reynolds was left to run a new campaign ad
apologizing for the scandal. Desperate much?
Finally, ABC News put the icing on the cake with this Saturday report:
Today, the Washington Post quoted an unnamed Congressional staffer who
said Hastert Chief of Staff Scott Palmer, one of the most powerful men
on Capitol Hill, personally met with then-Rep. Foley, R-Fla., about his
inappropriate contact with male pages. That meeting, the same source
tells the Post, took place long before Hastert says his office was first
alerted to "overly-friendly" e-mails Foley had sent to a Louisiana boy.
The New York Times also cites an anonymous Hill source who alleges
Palmer was warned about Foley's troubling behavior well before Hastert
has said his aides were first alerted in 2005.
Tune in next week, when Republican bloggers will blame the scandal on
Warren Harding, Tom Reynolds will call for the waterboarding of
congressional pages, and Dennis Hastert will open an investigation into
why he hasn't fired himself yet.
The Best of the Rest
George Allen found himself embroiled in a new stocks scandal; Karl
Rove's top aide Susan Ralston resigned over her role in the Jack
Abramoff affair; George W. Bush slid to 33% in a Newseek poll; Dick
Cheney and disgraced congressman "Duke" Cunningham exploded at
reporters; and Martha Rainville ripped off Hillary Clinton. And finally,
just when you thought they couldn't possibly get any dumber, Republicans
in Congress have apparently set aside $20 million for a "victory in
Iraq" party.
That's it. See you next week!
-- EarlG
© 2001 - 2006 Democratic Underground, LLC
From Archae's Roost, Sheboygan, WI
þ CMPQwk 1.42 16554 þ
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)
|