Text 4527, 114 rader
Skriven 2007-06-18 14:00:36 av JOHNJWILSON
     Kommentar till en text av TIM RICHARDSON
Ärende: Wayne Chirnside
=======================
-> On 06-17-07, JOHNJWILSON said to TIM RICHARDSON:
-> 
-> 
-> JJ>Ah.
-> 
-> 
-> JJ>Dear Diary:
-> 
-> 
-> JJ>A post tome from  Tim Richardson. I'll hit the reply button first
off...
-> 
-> 
-> I don't give a damn what `button' you hit...

Can't take a compliment, eh? :-)

 Inaccurate information, or out and
-> out `stretching of the truth' (sometimes called `lying') just to cover
for a
-> friend, if left unchallenged, typically has a way of `becoming cast in
stone'
-> in some areas of Fido.

In SOME areas almost anything may be said.
Inaccurate assessment of my wonderful self is something I'm used to.

-> 
-> 
-> A good example of that would be a well-known claim to have worked on a
-> weapons system as a `weapons systems mechanic', while not having had the
time
-> needed to do so, has been defended ad nauseum by many who should know
better,
-> but defend it anyway, only for the opportunity to stab at an enemy.
-> 
->

'Stab at an enemy.' I have no enemies. 
Bla bla bla...I care not at all of people 'history' ...read a few resumes
:-)

It's what a person says to me that contain information opinion
concerning interesting ideas...

A waste of time searching for errors, character flaws and personal
atttacks...

But hell, it's your time to waste...go for it.




-> Chirnside brought his problems on himself...

That is undoubtedly so in most cases...

I was suggesting that this might be an exception.

I do not know.



 He has talked about his drug use
-> in the past here in Fido, a few times right here in this echo. For all
we
-> know his present problems could very well involve narcotics. We don't
know
-> that they do.......but we certainly know he had a pattern of drug use in
the
-> past, he himself said so.

Why do you believe him in THIS case?


-> 
-> 
-> Whatever his present problems involve, its a sure bet he brought it on
-> himself...

...but not a _certain_ bet...


 Sympathy for him? Not from me...


Why am I not surprised? :-)

 This might be one of the very few
-> times in his life he is made to face responsibility for his own fuckups.
->
A distinct possibility.
 
-> 
-> Defend him all you like. But keep to the facts. The charges lodged
against
-> him make no mention if `illness' or `diminished capacity'

But included some sort of 'mental' investigation...
-> 
-> 
-> Mental examinations or evaluations are typically ordered by a court
because
-> an incident that brought a defendant into contact with law enforcement
-> involved some sort of violence or threat on the part of the defendant. A
-> charge of `trespass' is sometimes used to `hold' a defendant, while
other
-> facets of the case are investigated.

ok.That's all news to me.

I'm not a lawyer, nor a professional psychiatrist...
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)