Text 6081, 125 rader
Skriven 2008-01-22 18:20:00 av TIM RICHARDSON
Ärende: 35 Years after Roe
==========================
On 01-22-08, ROSS SAUER said to DAN CEPPA:


> Yet she hides behi


The cost of Roe at 35


By Cal Thomas



Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court unilaterally struck down
state laws restricting abortion, the cost of that decision continues to
increase our moral deficit, which will have far greater (and eternal)
consequences than the impact from economic challenges during a possible
recession.


Depending on how one counts the number of abortions per year since
1973, more than 50 million people who might have been are not. These were
people who, regardless of the circumstances of the women who carried them,
had the potential to contribute to the country and to the world. But now
they cannot, because they are not. Would we be fighting the battle over
immigration had we not rid ourselves of a generation of humans who
likely would have done the work for which we are now importing illegal
aliens?


Actions have consequences.


Roe and its companion case, Doe v. Bolton, took the question of
endowment of life by "our Creator" and placed it in the hands of individuals.
History has shown what happens when humanity seizes such power for
itself: political dictatorships, eugenics and scientific experiments
unrestrained by any moorings to a moral code. Each becomes her and his own
god; each becomes a taker of life, rather than a giver, inverting the
creation model into one of destruction and transforming the pregnant woman
from life-giver to life-taker.


The social restructuring unleashed by the judicial fiat that was Roe
created a cultural fissure that remains today. We moved quickly from
acknowledgement of a right to live, to assertions of a right to die. In
her essay "The Women of Roe v. Wade," Harvard professor Mary Ann
Glendon calls to mind the novelist Walker Percy who prophesied two years
before Roe that "Qualitarian Centers" would spring up, "where, as one of
Percy's characters explained, doctors would respect 'the right of an unwanted
child not to have to endure a life of suffering.'" State governments,
Percy suggested, might eventually recognize a right to die.


Arrangements would be made for the sick and elderly to push a button that
would transport them to a "happy death" in Michigan, a "joyful exitus" in New
York, or a "luanalu-hai" in Hawaii. Percy's fiction increasingly
resembles fact.


Abortion on demand cannot be seen in isolation from social breakdown.


In 1973, near the end of the Vietnam War and the approaching resignation
of President Nixon two years later, the focus on self, pleasure and
convenience by Baby Boomers was at its height. Marriages easily
dissolved as "no fault" divorce laws were passed; cohabitation and
out-of-wedlock births were on the rise; "unwanted babies" (who were labeled
"products of conception" to make it easier to deny the obvious) became an
impediment to the pursuit of pleasure and material gain.


Abortion was not a cause, but a reflection of our decadence and
deviancy.


One does not begin to kill babies until other dominos have fallen. And
once they have fallen, it becomes difficult to set them aright because
to do so would require an admission of something so horrible that those
responsible for this fetal holocaust would have to acknowledge their
sin and repent of it. Such a thing is not a character trait of this most
pampered generation.



In recent years there have been signs that things may be if not
turning around then moderating. According to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, abortion numbers have declined steadily since 1990, from a
high of 1.2 million annually to fewer than 900,000. This is due, I
believe, to the unrelenting commitment of the pro-life movement through
pregnancy help centers, information by Internet, marches and what
appears to be a growing pro-life consensus among many women who reject the
cavalier attitudes about life displayed by their mothers' feminist
generation.


Hollywood has infused a pro-life subplot into films such as "Juno" and
"Knocked Up." Might the "old-fashioned" become the new fashion?


Politicians and judges could help bury Roe by requiring that pregnant
women receive complete information about the nature of the life within
them, including being required to view sonograms before electing
abortion.


This would follow truth-in-labeling and truth-in-lending laws by fully
informing and empowering women. Such an approach would satisfy the
liberal demand to keep abortion "safe and legal" and the pro-life desire to
make them rare.


After 35 years of slaughtering our young, isn't it time to stop? That
child born in 1973 could be a parent now. There are children who could
have been born today. Thirty-five years of killing has diminished and
corrupted us all. Let's summon the moral courage to stop it for our
sake and for theirs.





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)