Text 6484, 157 rader
Skriven 2008-03-27 05:41:00 av TIM RICHARDSON
     Kommentar till en text av ROSS SAUER
Ärende: Successful Columnist Ann
================================
On 03-27-08, ROSS SAUER said to BOB KLAHN:


RS>Heck, they don't even do that with their own, like Alan Keyes.


Geez......I almost forgot:


HILLARY: SWIFTBOATED!


March 26, 2008


Hillary is being "swiftboated"!


She claimed that she came under sniper fire when she visited in Bosnia in
1996, but was contradicted by videotape showing her sauntering off the plane
and stopping on the tarmac to listen to a little girl read her a poem.


Similarly, John Kerry's claim to heroism in Vietnam was contradicted by 264
Swift Boat Veterans who served with him. His claim to having been on a secret
mission to Cambodia for President Nixon on Christmas 1968 was contradicted
not only by all of his commanders -- who said he would have been
court-martialed if he had gone anywhere near Cambodia -- but also the simple
fact that Nixon wasn't president on Christmas 1968.


In Hillary's defense, she probably deserves a Purple Heart about as much as
Kerry did for his service in Vietnam.


Also, unlike Kerry, Hillary acknowledged her error, telling the Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review: "I was sleep-deprived, and I misspoke." (What if she's
sleep-deprived when she gets that call on the red phone at 3 a.m., imagines a
Russian nuclear attack and responds with mutual assured destruction? Oops.
"It proves I'm human.")


The reason no one claims Hillary is being "swiftboated" is that the
definition of "swiftboating" is: "producing irrefutable evidence that a
Democrat is lying."


And for purposes of her race against matinee idol B. Hussein Obama, Hillary
has become the media's honorary Republican.


In liberal-speak, only a Democrat can be swiftboated. Democrats are
"swiftboated"; Republicans are "guilty." So as an honorary Republican,
Hillary isn't being swiftboated; she's just lying.


Indeed, instead of attacking the people who produced a video of Hillary's
uneventful landing in Bosnia, the mainstream media are the people who
discovered that video.


I've always wondered how a Democrat would fare being treated like a
Republican by the media. Now we know.


It's such fun watching liberals turn on the Clintons! The bitter infighting
among Democrats is especially enjoyable after having to listen to Democrats
hyperventilate for months about how delighted they were to have so many
wonderful choices for president.


Now liberals just want to be rid of the Clintons -- which is as close to
actual mainstream thinking as they've been in years. So the media suddenly
notice when Hillary "misspeaks," while rushing to make absurd excuses for
much greater outrages by her opponent.


Liberals are even using the Slick Willy defense when Obama is caught
fraternizing with a racist loon. When Bill Clinton was exposed as a
philandering, adulterous, pathological liar, his defenders said that
everybody is a philandering, adulterous, pathological liar.


And now, when B. Hussein Obama is caught in a 20-year relationship with a
raving racist, his defenders scream that everybody is a racist wack-job.


In the Obama speech on race that Chris Matthews deemed "worthy of Abraham
Lincoln," B. Hussein Obama defended Wright's anti-American statements,
saying:


"For the men and women of Rev. Wright's generation, the memories of
humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the
bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in
front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the
barbershop or around the kitchen table."


So in the speech the media are telling us is on a par with the Gettysburg
Address, B. Hussein Obama casually informed us that even blacks who seem to
like white people actually hate our guts.


First of all: Watch out the next time you get your hair cut by a black barber
over the age of 50.


Second, Rev. Wright's world wasn't segregated.


And third, what about Wright's wanton anti-Semitism? All the liberals
(including essence-besplattered Chris Matthews) have accepted Obama's defense
of Wright and want us to understand Wright's "legitimate" rage over his
painful youth in segregated America.


But the anti-Semitic tone of Wright's sermons is as clear as his rage against
the United States. Rev. Wright calls Israel a "dirty word" and a "racist
country." He denounces Zionism and calls for divestment from Israel.

In addition to videos of Rev. Wright's sermons, Obama's church also offers
for sale sermons by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, whom Rev. Wright
joined on a visit to Moammar Gadhafi in Libya in 1984. Just last year,

Obama's church awarded Farrakhan the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter
Award, saying Farrakhan "truly epitomized greatness."


What, pray tell, is the legitimate source of Wright's anti-Semitism? I
believe Brother Obama passed over that issue entirely in his "conversation,"
even as he made the obligatory bow to Israel's status as one of our "stalwart
allies." Why does crazy "uncle" Wright dislike Jews?


Will liberals contend that these remarks were "taken out of context"? Maybe
Wright's church was trying to say that Farrakhan isn't great when it said he
"epitomized greatness." Who knows? We weren't there.


Can liberals please educate us on the "legitimate" impulses behind Rev.
Wright's Jew-baiting?


COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER



"I actually *HAVE* the meteorite."  .........Sauer





---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)