Text 7065, 97 rader
Skriven 2008-08-09 18:08:11 av Ross Sauer (1:123/789.0)
   Kommentar till text 7064 av JIM HOLSONBACK (1:123/140)
Ärende: Coulter's Column
========================
"JIM HOLSONBACK -> ROSS SAUER" <1:123/140> wrote in
news:24201$POL_INC@JamNNTPd:

 JH>> Interview where he admits to the sex affair which he has
 JH>   repeatedly JH> denied will be aired tonight on ABC's Nightline.

 RS>> Yeah, nothing sells like sex.

 JH> If there's anyone in Fidonet who enjoys a good sex scandal, it is you.
 JH> But not so much when it's a Dem, right? Good to see the liberal MSM
 JH> types finally getting involved, now that Edwards has finally admitted
 JH> it.

It's not the sex.
It's the damn hypocrisy.

That's why the Edwards story bugs me somewhat, he used his wife as a
campaign prop.
And she knew that she had been used AS a prop, by a guy who had (still
has?) been fooling around on her.

 JH>> Can you imagine what the MSM would have done along with this
 JH>   story if JH> Edwards had been a Repub?

 RS>> Yeah, even though Edwards isn't running. For anything right now,
 JH>   still RS> gotta chase him.

 JH> Huh? As recently as 20 June, the AP cited a member of the
 JH> Congressional Black Causus saying that Edwards was on Obama's
 JH> "shortlist" for Veep. What is the date of the first report you have
 JH> seen that he is no longer being considered for that office?  Your
 JH> excuse is lame - - Edwards is fair game.

Back in 2000, Cheney wasn't on Bush's "shortlist."
I wonder how that turned out? (sarcasm off)

This "shortlist" is a media concoction. Nothing more.

 JH> And Edwards certainly was running for President when the Enquirer
 JH> first broke the story like 10 months ago, and for the first three of
 JH> those, Edwards was still running for President - - but the Liberal MSM
 JH> sat on the story, whining that they just could not, try as they might,
 JH> find any proof.  Powerless, only when they want to be.

Would you run a story from the National Enquirer, if you owned a news
media outlet?

How about the Globe?
They are reporting that George and Laura Bush are already *IN* divorce
proceedings.

The Weekly World News went belly up, so now for the really wild-ass
stories we'll have to go to Fox News.

 RS>> I mean, it's not like he's Obama, that republican who has stayed
 RS>> faithful to his first wife...oh yeah, he's the democrat running
 JH>   for RS> president.

 JH> Are you 100.0000% positive that Obama has never had a little action on
 JH> the side?  How would you react if there were allegations that he had?

No, I'm not 100% positive.
Are you 100% positive John McCain didn't have a bunch of boyfriends,
when he was younger?

 RS>> Well, there is the guy running for president on the GOP side, oh
 RS>> wait...yeah, he cheated on his first wife, alienating Ron and
 JH>   Nancy RS> Reagan, then dumped wife #1 for a really rich trophy wife.

 JH> Of course I had to know you would drag a red herring over this, but a
 JH> red herring damn near 30 years old?  And _before_ he had entered
 JH> politics?

30 years ago, so what. He still *DID* cheat on his crippled wife, and
married a woman younger than his frikkin' daughter.
A rich, dope-addicted wife.

 RS>> Oh that's different! he's a REPUBLICAN! So it doesn't count!

 RS>> IAOKIYAAR...

 JH> Nanoo, nanoo!

It's Always OK If You Are A Republican...

Now...

Let's look at McBush's campaign, which I call the "Bullshit Talk
Express."

McCain repeated his near-labeling of Obama as a traitor, just this week.

Didn't McBush promise to run a "positive campaign?"
Yet another in the dozens of McBush's flip-flops.

--- Xnews/5.04.25
 * Origin: The Eastern Star - Fidonet Via Your Newsreader (1:123/789.0)