Text 7155, 196 rader
Skriven 2008-08-15 04:50:00 av TIM RICHARDSON (1:123/140)
     Kommentar till en text av ROSS SAUER
Ärende: Edwards
===============
On 08-15-08, ROSS SAUER said to TIM RICHARDSON:


TR>> I have to wonder at your (supposed) indignation here. What could
TR>> `you' possibly have concerns about.


RS>> Because they are the ones who crow about "family values."


RS>> The only family values the GOP has is the tax breaks from their
RS>> kids.


TR> And so.......*you* are deeply concerned about `family values'?


RS>No. Hypocrisy.


Yeah, right!


RS>.. RS>> But if a democrat cheats on his wife?
RS>>> "Hang him!"


RS>> According to supermarket tabloids, Bush younger is very close to
RS>> divorce.


TR> Are these the same *supermarket tabloids* you've been so condemning of
TR> for over 15 years?


RS>Why not? You guys believe them.


No.......thats a red herring *you've* dragged around for several years.
There's no truth in it.......but you toss it out there, trying desperately to
make it the truth.


RS>> Really?


RS>> Show me Fox news is a more credible source.


TR> Well.....Fox News can at least pronounce and spell people's names
TR> correctly, and do not have to stoop to demonizing those they criticize
TR> by miss-spelling their names, or making up stupid-assed acronyms for
TR> them.


RS>Oh my! Spelling flame!


No `spelling flame' involved. You have deliberately used such things as
*snorty McCokespoon* to refer to president Bush (a reference *you* probably
should have left alone given your own experience with the substance.


Hypocrisy? Maybe you should look a little closer to home for hypocrisy. Don't
look now......but its sitting in your chair!)


You have used various pronunciations of McCain's name to refer to him (or have
you forgotten your little made up name `McBush' you've used only recently?)


TR>> And....there are private citizens who will be so blinded by their
TR>> hatred and jealousy of someone's success.


RS>> You mean like the guys who put out Hustler and Girls Gone Wild?


TR> Didn't realize you were into that sort of reading material


RS>I'm not.


Then why did you bring them up?


RS>*YOU* are the one who is so in love with Ann Coulter.


There's another of your favorite red herrings you desperately cling to.


The fact is.......the only things I care about Ann Coulter is:


1. You are insanely jealous of her wealth and success.


2. The things she writes seem to piss `you' (and a few others) off to the max.


3. You have claimed a few times that you too could do what she does to make
money, but the only thing stopping you is your higher sense of morality (good
thing I didn't have a mouthful of coffee when I typed that! ha ha ha ha ha).


TR> And I see you deliberately edited that paragraph to drop a lot of the
TR> content.


RS>So?


RS>You've constantly took my quotes out of context, and simply made them
RS>up.


The `context' of what you say isn't `out of context'. For instance...you once
said: "That nigger was shot!" ......Sauer


In what context did you mean that?


There are several uncomplimentary things you've stated about Jews. In what
context did you mean them? Or was it that `aunt' of yours you were quoting
again?


As for your accusation of my having `made them up'....thats ludicrous! I'm not
the only one who archives. Anyone who archives can dig out some of the stuff
you've said in the past.


The plain truth is....you (and a few others as well, it seems) don't like some
of the things you've said coming back to remind you that you aren't exactly
the perfect individual you put on to be, or demand that others aspire to.


Some of the standards you accuse others of lacking......you yourself do not
possess. Its difficult to take you seriously when you accuse someone else of
being racist......given some of the things you've said about blacks.


Its nearly impossible to take your claims of your own personal `tolerance' of
homosexuality seriously.......when you go right to the `homo' slams in order
to fling what you percieve as the worst, most hateful insult you can think up,
as a counter argument aimed at someone you despise.


TR> ======================================================================
RS>=
TR> ===== And....there are private citizens who will be so blinded by
TR> their hatred and jealousy of someone's success......so unable to
TR> counter that persons points or statements, that they will stoop to
TR> falsely accusing them of being a bull dyke!
TR> ======================================================================


RS>Who repeatedly called John Edwards faggy, and called Al Gore a fag?


RS>"Oh she was just joking!"
RS>Horseshit.


So.........*that* is the reason you stoop to lowball tactics like accusing her
of being a bull dyke! Because `she' did it! Thats like a guy who stands trial
for bank robbery telling the judge: `Well......John Dillinger did it first!'


See..........here's the problem you have with that.


I know good and well that you and Danny, and a few others recall the raging
controversy in HolySmoke and some other echoes over the subject of
homosexuals and their push on all fronts to try to legitimize what a large
segment of society sees as a degenerate behavior.


You and all the others took up the cause for homosexuals and their so-called
`rights' etc etc, and thoroughly condemned me for being on the opposing side.


Yet......when you want to belittle or insult someone you despise, you go right
to the `homo' slams! Thereby making a mockery of your former staunch defense
of the homosexual agenda! Hypocrisy? You should look a little closer to home
for hypocrisy. Its sitting right in your own chair!




---
*Durango b301 #PE* 
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)