Text 8297, 75 rader
Skriven 2008-11-17 19:12:54 av JOHNJWILSON
     Kommentar till en text av BOB KLAHN
Ärende: Ring around Earl nonsense
=================================
-> 
TID: PX/Win v3.0pr5a PX96-0746M2
-> 
MSGID: 1:124/311 0eef2ec5
-> 
TZUTC: -0600
-> 
->  ...
-> 
-> ~>>  As you just asserted, baselessly.
-> 
-> ~>>  EC> Open the link and search for the word "update."  It is not
-> ~>>  EC> as extreme as Ceppa's bogus quotations, but the fact
-> ~>>  EC> remains it isn't there.
-> 
-> ~>>  Earl... more dishonesty from you. The article in the LA Times
-> ~>>  was the source for the update.
-> 
->  EC> I was following the link that YOU gave.  I was looking for
->  EC> the passage that YOU said was there.   I wanted to know
-> 
->  There are two links. I gave them both to you. That one was the
->  source for the update. You have had the opportunity to see both.
->  So, you have been given both the source for the update, and the
->  Factcheck article. IOW, whatever order you see them in, by now
->  you have had them both spoon fed to you. So all your arguement
->  about it is BS.
-> 
->  EC> what you were talking about, but it turned out that YOU did
->  EC> not know what you were talking about.  It wasn't there.
-> 
->  You have both links. The whole story is there.
-> 
->  EC> The honest thing for you to do at that point was for you to
-> 
->  The honest thing for you to do at this point is to either admit
->  you have both links, and have verified everything I have said,
->  or admit you chose not to and are faking it as you go.
-> 
->  EC> admit that I was right, acknowledge that you goofed by
-> 
->  You either know you were wrong, or chose not to follow the
->  links.
-> 
->  EC> confusing that link with another story that you may or may
->  EC> not have tossed out somewhere in the thread, own up to the
-> 
->  You have been given both links. If you chose not to look at one,
->  then it is your failure, not mine. There is no pretend, you have
->  both links.
-> 
->  Here they are again, just to make it clear to the whole world.
-> 
->  www.snipurl.com/mccrash
-> 
->  www.snipurl.com/crashcheck
-> 
->  EC> fact that your initial dogmatic "I got it right, you got it
->  EC> wrong" response was completely wrong, and vow to be more
->  EC> accurate and more open-minded in the future.
-> 
->  Since *BOTH* links led to the report that McCain said his engine
->  failed, but that the evidence was that his engine did not fail,
->  then your claim that I got it wrong is a falsehood on your part.
-> 
->  EC> That is what you should have done.  But you just couldn't
->  EC> do it.  Sad.
-> 
->  Since both links contain the report of McCain's false report,
->  and the evidence that it was false, your diversion to which
->  report had the word *update* in it is what is truly sad.
-> 
(Grumble) 'Sad'. THAT was the word I was looking for....


:-)
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
 * Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)