Text 8511, 34 rader
Skriven 2008-12-09 08:05:54 av Earl Croasmun (1:124/311)
     Kommentar till en text av Bob Klahn
Ärende: RE: Excellent summation
===============================
~>  EC> The Navy report concluded that he failed to "maintain an
~>  EC> airspeed above the stall speed" while he was turning.  My
~>  EC> mistake was in taking that to mean that he dropped the
~>  EC> engine speed down to the point that it stalled.  The more
~>  EC> detailed stories seem to indicate that the turn rubbed off
~>  EC> airspeed that was not compensated for, resulting in the
 
~> ~>>  What you
~> ~>>  have pushed over and over is that he had to lose airspeed to
~> ~>>  crash.
 
~>  EC> That is a rather obvious and glaring lie.  But that just
~>  EC> means another drop in a vast ocean.  And a rather
~>  EC> intentional lie, since it tries to go back and resurrect
~>  EC> your irrelevant claim that in the abstract a plane CAN
~>  EC> crash in a turn without losing airspeed by pretending that
~>  EC> it was a response to something I in fact didn't say!
 
~>  Actually, as above, you did say what I said you said.

Actually you exposed your lie yourself.  Based on the Navy report, Ceppa
and I concluded that McCain lost airspeed in that particular turn.  You
made a comment (irrelevant and unsupported though it was) that he did not
HAVE TO lose speed in the turn, that it is possible to make a turn without
losing any speed at all.  I pointed out to you a number of times that it
was irrelevant whether he HAD TO or not.  When that finally sank into your
skull, you tried to make it SEEM relevant by concocting a lie wherein you
claimed (above) that I said that one HAS TO lose airspeed in a turn.  Just
another example of your longstanding pattern of making a mistake and then,
instead of admitting error, covering up with a lie.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
 * Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311)