Text 150, 152 rader
Skriven 2006-09-11 16:38:55 av Ward Dossche (2:292/854)
ฤrende: Routing
===============
Dear all,
 
Again I'm confronted with bouncing netmail to a valid listed sysop, using a
valid netmail-address. It arrives at its destination and is returned as
undeliverable ("unroutable" it says but in a Fido-environment this particular
comment is invalid since the message had already arrived at its destination).
 
Technically to me it seems to mean that this particular sysop is unable to
receive Fido-netmail on either of his addresses.
 
This is now the umpteenth case of such a thing occuring and I've had it.
 
RC46 has been requested to look into the issue and until further notice needs
to check-in. Maybe he's out on vacation, work-assignment or whatever which
demonstrates why I like being told you're there or you're not there.
 
Any such cases presenting themselves in future will, starting right now, be
dealt with in a strong manner. Either a sysop is in Fidonet or he/she isn't.
 
Sysops unable to receive netmail, even worse, do receive it but bounce it
telling it cannot be delivered have no place in the network.
 
Anybody having a different opinion here?
 
Greetings,
 
 \%/@rd
 
************************* QUOTE *************************
Date: 08 Sep 06  17:20:00
From: Mail Delivery System on 2:46/999  R46 InGate in Ukraine and Moldova
  To: Ward Dossche on 2:292/854  many-glacier.mine.nu in Mortsel B
Subj: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
____________________________________________________________________________
 
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@apex.dp.ua>
 
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
 
  Eugene.Migolinets@apex.dp.ua
    Unrouteable address
 
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
 
Return-path: <Ward.Dossche@f854.n292.z2.fidonet.org>
Received: from root by apex.dp.ua with local (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD))
id 1GLhD6-0003Mz-9p
for Eugene.Migolinets@apex.dp.ua; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:20:00 +0300
Received: from f854.n292.z2.fidonet.org by f36.n464.z2.fidonet.org
with FTN (ifmail v.2.14.os-p7) id AA12943; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:20:00 +0300
Apparently-To: Eugene.Migolinets
To: Eugene Migolinets <Eugene.Migolinets@f36.n464.z2.fidonet.org>
From: Ward Dossche <Ward.Dossche@f854.n292.z2.fidonet.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:26:23 +0300
Subject: 46/999
Message-ID: <30009@f854.n292.z2>
X-FTN-FLAGS: PVT TRN
X-FTN-MSGID: 2:292/854 00007539
X-FTN-PID: DB 2.55
X-FTN-TID: DB 2.55
X-FTN-Via: 2:292/854@fidonet @20060908.132656.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
X-FTN-Via: 2:464/910 @20060908.141507.UTC FTrack 3.01/FBSD
 
CC: Serg Kondratuk
 
Serg,
 
I'm getting this message from 2:46/999 as a result of a mail destined to
2:46/999 from my system.
 
This is nonsense. 2:46/999 is a perfectly valid and listed system which
should be capable of handling perfectly normal Fido-mail.
 
I would appreciate you to instruct the sysop of 2:46/999 on how to properly
process normal Fido-mail.
 
If the sysop of said node cannot handle mail destined to his own node then I
completely fail to understand why he is in the nodelist in the first-place.
 
Thank you for looking into this and handling it.
 
Take care,
 
 \%/@rd
 
************************* QUOTE *************************
Date: 08 Sep 06  15:45:02
From: Mail Delivery System on 2:46/999  R46 InGate in Ukraine and Moldova
  To: O/T-Track+ 2 85 on 2:292/854  many-glacier.mine.nu in Mortsel B
Subj: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
____________________________________________________________________________
 
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@apex.dp.ua>
 
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
 
  Hattie.Dougherty@apex.dp.ua
    Unrouteable address
 
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
 
Return-path: <O/T-Track+.2.85@f854.n292.z2.fidonet.org>
Received: from root by apex.dp.ua with local (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD))
id 1GLfjC-000E3z-5O
for Hattie.Dougherty@apex.dp.ua; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:45:02 +0300
Received: from f854.n292.z2.fidonet.org by f36.n464.z2.fidonet.org
with FTN (ifmail v.2.14.os-p7) id AA54053; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:45:02 +0300
Apparently-To: Hattie.Dougherty
To: Hattie Dougherty <Hattie.Dougherty@f999.n46.z2.fidonet.org>
From: "O/T-Track+ 2.85" <O/T-Track+.2.85@f854.n292.z2.fidonet.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:18:00 +0300
Subject: Message *bounced*
Message-ID: <2702094592@f854.n292.z2.fidonet>
X-FTN-FLAGS: PGM XMA PVT
X-FTN-MSGID: 2:292/854@fidonet a10eb100
X-FTN-PID: O/T+ 2.85 PH28809
X-FTN-Via: 2:292/854@fidonet @20060908.111800.UTC O/T-Track+ 2.85
X-FTN-Via: UniMail/W32 0.50bU 2:467/70, 08 Sep 2006 11:31:26 UTC +0400
 
 
 
  ษอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออป
  ศอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออผ
 
     You have sent encoded-mail via this system (2:292/854 AKA 2:2/0).
 
This is a useless operation as this node does not permit this type of mail.
 
  ษอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออป
  ศอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออผ
 
    From:  Hattie Dougherty @2:46/999
    To:    69 @2:480/127.69
    Subj.: California (AP)
    Dated: 08 Sep 06  11:53:03
    [processed here:  08 Sep 06 13:18:00]
 
  ษอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออป
  ศอออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออออผ
 
 
Encrypted text not visible in bounce message!
...

--- D'Bridge 2.55
 * Origin: MANY GLACIER *** Preserve - Protect - Conserve *** (2:292/854)