Text 552, 92 rader
Skriven 2005-01-20 10:30:00 av "lvernet" <lvernet@vorlon (1:278/230)
Ärende: Re: Geek Fusion: The really Low-down
============================================



"Eva" <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:359iq4F4jcql0U1@individual.net...
> "LVernet" <LVernet@vorlonempire.com> wrote in message
> news:358mtcF4jn79aU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Bizarro7" <bizarro7@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:20050119083226.15522.00000106@mb-m02.aol.com...
>> >>>I thought Leah hated Atlantis because it took away from SG-1? If so,
> why
>> > does she give a toss about Rainbow?<<
>> >
>> > An actor is not a show.
>
> LOL, has Leah's post been altered by someone?  Or has she finally seen the
> light?

Presumably after that post Stargate isn't really Daniel's journey after all.

>> As Michael Shanks is proving each and every week in season 8 with his
>> appalling performances. He should be told that frowning and pouting don't
>> make him look serious, it makes him look like he's constipated. Mugging
> for
>> the camera isn't acting. Prometheus Unbound sadly showed that there is no
>> way he can hold an episode by himself.
>
> Laurelin, dear, careful, one might get an impression you do not like MS...

I liked him just fine until he came back.

> I have just formed a theory, should I share it with you? <doesn't wait for
> the answer>  I think the more bulk (or muscle or whatever you want to call
> it) MS puts on, the more he overacts.  The overacting certainly got worse
> during the current season when MS has seems to have ..... worked on his
> physique more than ever before.

Does that explain the pouty face, the waggling eyebrows and the imitation
bobbleheaded doll?

>> > I don't hate Atlantis. It's just proven itself a bore to this viewer. A
>> > bore
>> > that Sci-Fi has surgically attached to STARGATE SG-1 to prop it up.
>> > Hopefully,
>> > it will be improved in the 2nd half of the first season, as some
>> > viewers
>> > have
>> > claimed.
>>
>> Ah Leah, revisionist historian that you are. You're quite, quite
> hilarious.
>
> It would seem that it is, in fact, "Atlantis" which is propping up "SG-1".

Please Carl, don't move to the dark side. Stay on the side of light, where
CharacterisationAndContinuingPlotAndNarrative rule.

>> > And I can feel sorry for an actor, no matter how I feel about the show
>> > he's on
>> > (or not on much anymore, as the case apparently will be).
>> >
>>
>> I think it's likely that you're only sorry for him because your apparent
>> dislike of anyone who writes for or runs something in the Stargate
>> franchise.
>
> But we knew that already, right?  IMO, if people hate something, they
> should
> hate it for the right reasons.  'Taking away from SG-1' would not be one
> of
> them.  I can very helpfully offer a few right reasons (yes, I like to be
> helpful):  bad writing, bad acting, bad characterisation or inconsistent
> and
> confusing arc would be a good start.

Hating Atlantis just because SG-1 sucks probably makes sense.

> But hey, there is hope, Leah might like the second half! <as Shep>  Now
> stay
> positive.  (I love the way he stresses the 'o' in the 'po'.)

I consider this for a moment and quote Rodney, "You jest."

Laurelin





--- UseNet To RIME Gateway @ 1/20/05 10:23:18 AM ---
 * Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)