Text 1978, 401 rader
Skriven 2006-01-09 23:33:24 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0601092) for Mon, 2006 Jan 9
===================================================
===========================================================================
President Discusses Education, Celebrates NCLB's 4th Anniversary
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
January 9, 2006

President Discusses Education, Celebrates NCLB's 4th Anniversary
North Glen Elementary School
Glen Burnie, Maryland

President's Remarks
"); //--> view

˙˙˙˙˙Fact Sheet: No Child Left Behind - Strengthening America's Education
System
˙˙˙˙˙In Focus: Education

10:26 A.M. EST

MRS. BUSH: Thanks, everybody. I'm so happy to be here today with the
President and with our Secretary of Education, Margaret Spellings. Kendel
Ehrlich, thank you. So glad you've joined us today.

We're here today because today we're celebrating the fourth anniversary of
the signing of the No Child Left Behind Act. And we're at this school
because they've taken advantage of all the aspects of the No Child Left
Behind law and they've been able to raise their scores and make sure that
no child is left behind in their school.

Over the last year I've spent a lot of time on the road with an initiative
called Helping America's Youth. Through the Helping America's Youth
initiative, we're encouraging communities to work to make sure that
children and teens get the help that they need so they can grow into
successful adults. We want every young American to be surrounded by caring
adults who provide love, advice, encouragement, and who can serve as good
role models for children. And, of course, all of us know that America's
schools are at the heart of helping America's youth, because every child
must have a great education so he or she can have a bright future.

Today our schools are improving, thanks to the No Child Left Behind law,
and through the teachers and the principals who bring out the best in our
children every day. I especially want to thank, now, the teachers and the
principals here at this school. (Applause.)

As a former teacher, myself, and as a mother, I'm proud to be married to a
man who cares deeply about the future of every child. Ladies and gentlemen,
my husband, the President of the United States, George W. Bush. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. Please be seated. Thanks for the warm
introduction. It's great to be here with Laura. She is a fantastic mom. She
understands something that's very interesting -- all education begins at
home. I can remember her reading to our little girls all the time.
Occasionally, I did, too, but stumbled over a few of the words and might
have confused them. (Laughter.) Laura cares deeply about education, as do
I.

Thank you all for coming. We're here at North Glen Elementary School
because it is a center of educational excellence. That's why we're here.
We're here to herald success. We're here to say -- (applause.)

It so happens this is the fourth anniversary of when I signed the No Child
Left Behind Act. I think the No Child Left Behind Act is one of the most
significant accomplishments in education in a long, long time. I want to
thank both the Republicans and Democrats who worked together back then to
get this piece of legislation passed. It is a really important piece of
legislation that is working. And I'm here today to talk about the spirit of
the No Child Left Behind Act, the evidence that says it's working, and my
deep desire to work with Congress to make sure it continues to have the
desired effect on children all across the country.

First, I want to welcome our Secretary of Education, Margaret Spellings.
I've known her for a long time. She is a dear friend of mine who also
happens to be a significant warrior when it comes to leaving no children
behind in our society. She believes that I believe -- like I believe, that
every single child can learn, and we've got to make sure that every child
does learn.

I want to thank you for your leadership, Margaret. You're doing a heck of a
job as the Secretary of Education. I want to thank the First Lady, as well,
for being here -- Kendel, thanks for coming. Tell that old husband of yours
it's okay to sleep in occasionally. (Laughter.) Dutch, I want to thank you
for being here -- Congressman Ruppersberger's district -- real proud you
took time out of your life to be here. Thanks for coming. I also want to
thank Congressman Wayne Gilchrest for being here, as well. Wayne,
appreciate you taking time.

I want to thank all the local and state officials who've joined us. I want
to thank Nancy Mann, the superintendent of schools for this school
district. Julie, thank you -- the principal, Julie Little-McVearry, who is
the -- listen, let me say something -- and by the way, Maurine Larkin, who
is the former principal here.

One of the things that's interesting, that when you look at public schools,
when you find centers of excellence, you always find a principal that is
capable of setting high standards, working with teachers, demanding results
and following through to make sure that the schools achieve the results.
Every school requires a dedicated educational entrepreneur, someone willing
to challenge the status quo if there's failure, and being imaginative about
how to achieve results. And you've got such principals here. Again, I want
to congratulate Julie and Maurine for leading this school. You've done a
heck of a job, and we're proud -- we're proud to honor you. (Applause.)

We went to Laneie Taylor's 5th grade class. I see that they're here.
Laneie, thank you -- second-year teacher. Listen, schools succeed because
they've got teachers that care. And I want to thank all the teachers who
are here.

One of my predecessors as the governor of Texas was Sam Houston. You may
have heard of him, may not have heard of him. (Laughter.) Interesting old
guy. He was the President of the Republic of Texas. He was a United States
senator. He was a congressman from Tennessee. He was the governor of Texas.
He had done a lot of things. He led the battle of San Jacinto. I mean, he
was a heck of a guy. They asked him, of all the things you've done in your
life, what is the most important job? He said, "Teacher." And so, all the
teachers here, thanks for teaching. It is really an important job, and we
appreciate your dedication in the classroom.

And to the parents of the students who come here, thanks for caring.
Schools that succeed have got parents who are involved at the school. And
so, whatever is working here in terms of parental involvement is -- needs
to be duplicated around this state and around the country, because parental
involvement is a very important part of the success of schools around
America.

So the No Child Left Behind Act -- we got here to Washington, and I decided
to make sure that the public school system in America met the promise of --
and the hopes of our country. I understand how important it is to have a
public school system work really well. A vibrant America is one in which
the public schools provide a avenue for success. And it's really important
we have a good public school system. It's been important in the past that
the public school system function well, and it's going to be really
important in the future.

Secondly, we have a moral obligation to make sure every child gets a good
education. That's how I -- it's a moral obligation to make sure that we
herald success and challenge failure. It's not right to have a system that
quits on kids. I mean, some schools may not think they're quitting on kids,
but when you shuffle kids through the schools without determining whether
or not they can read and write and add and subtract, I view that as
quitting on kids. I called it the soft bigotry of low expectations. In
other words, you believe certain children can't learn, so, therefore, just
move them through. It's kind of a process world, isn't it? It's more
important that somebody be shuffled through than it is to determine whether
or not they're capable of meeting certain standards in certain grades.

And it troubled me to realize that in my own state of Texas, as well as
other states, there wasn't that sense of urgency, there wasn't that sense
of focus on results. It was kind of a process world we lived in. And we
were beginning to realize that as a result of a process world, the kids
were coming out of the school system that were illiterate. And it wasn't
right. It was morally wrong, in my judgment, not to challenge a system that
wasn't achieving great national goals such as an illiterate -- a literate
workforce. See, we live in a competitive world. And we'd better make sure
the future of this country has the got the capacity to compete in that
world.

And the best place to start is to make sure every child can read and write
and add and subtract. And so that was the spirit behind proposing the No
Child Left Behind Act. And as I mentioned, there was a lot of non-partisan
cooperation -- kind of a rare thing in Washington. But it made sense when
it come [sic] to public schools.

The No Child Left Behind Act embodied these principles: First, there is a
role for the federal government, a funding role. In other words, the
federal government has committed, and should be committed, to helping Title
I students, for example. As a matter of fact, Title I program spending has
increased 45 percent since 2001. There is what's called the elementary and
secondary school program; that's up by 41 percent. In other words, there is
a federal dollar commitment. Certainly not as big as the state government
or as local government, nor should it be. I don't think you want the
federal government funding all public schools. But I do think you want the
federal government focusing money on certain aspects of public education.

I also believe that sometimes you can have so many goals there are no
goals. In other words, there's just this kind of long list of goals and so
nothing gets accomplished. I'm the kind of person that believes that we
ought to set specific goals, and one of the most specific goals we've set
is that every child should be reading at grade level by the 3rd grade, and
remain at grade level. That's a clear goal; it's easy to understand,
there's no ambiguity with it. It says every child -- not just some
children, every child -- ought to be reading at grade level by the 3rd
grade -- no doubt it's not the 2nd or 10th, it's 3rd -- and remain there.

And so we back that goal up. And by the way, it's the understanding that if
you can't figure out -- if you can't read, you can't do math or science.
Reading is the gateway to educational excellence. That's why I asked the
kids in your classroom whether or not they read more than they watched TV.
I was pleased to see a lot of hands went up. It's kind of a hard question
to ask in this day and age, isn't it, particularly since we've got too many
TV channels to begin with. (Laughter.)

And so we quadrupled the amount of money available for what's called the
Reading First Program. In other words, we set the goal and the federal
government has provided the money for certain parts of the education system
around the country. We're not going to fund it all, but we're going to make
targeted funding. And it's a good use of money, in my judgment.

On the other hand, it seems like to me if we're going to spend money, we
ought to be asking the question, is it -- are we getting the results for
the money. In other words, once there's a commitment, a logical follow-up
to that commitment is, why don't you show us -- why don't you show us
whether or not we're meeting goals. So, in other words, let's measure,
finally.

And so the No Child Left Behind Act has said that in return for federal
money, we'll test 3 through 8. Children will be tested in grades 3 through
8. And why do we do that? Well, one is to figure out whether or not kids
are learning. It's an interesting way to determine whether or not the
curriculum you're using works.

I remember when I was the governor of Texas, there was a lot of debate
about different types of curriculum, different ways to teach reading. You
might remember those debates. They were full of all kinds of politics. The
best way to cut through the political debate is to measure. The best way to
say, the program I'm using is working, is because you're able to measure to
determine whether or not it's working. That's what this school has done.
They said, we welcome accountability because we believe our teachers are
great and the system we use can work.

Another reason to measure is so that the parents stay involved. You know,
there's a lot of anecdotal evidence about parents believing that the
schools their kids go to is doing just fine. That's what you would hope if
you were a parent. I mean, it's a natural inclination to say, gosh, my kid
goes to a really good school. I like the principal, I like the teachers.
But sure enough, in some cases, the performance might not have been up to
par.

And so making sure there's an accountability system that the parents get to
see is one that says to a parent, you know, if things aren't going so well,
get involved with the school and help. Or if things are going well, make
sure you thank the teachers. Make sure you take time out of your day to
thank the person whose soul is invested in the future of your child. It's
like the teachers right here in this school have invested their time and
efforts to make sure the children learn to read. I bet there's nothing
better than a teacher to have a thankful parent come up and say, thank you
for making sure my daughter or my son has got the capacity to be able to
succeed in this great country.

Measurement also is a way to let schools understand how they're doing
relative to other schools, or school districts to see how they're doing
relative to other school districts. In other words, if you're living in the
school district here, and one school like this was doing fine, another one
is not, it should provide an opportunity for the principal of that school
or the parents of that school to say, wait a minute, look at this school
over here, it's doing fine; how come we're not? You can't solve a problem
until you diagnose it, is what I'm telling you. And our accountability
system helps us all diagnose problems and solve them early, before it's too
late.

One of the interesting parts of the No Child Left Behind Act was what's
called supplemental service money. I don't know if you've used it here, or
not -- bet you have to a certain extent. It basically says, if a child is
falling behind, here is extra money from the federal government to help you
catch up. If a child needs help in reading, we've diagnosed a problem early
and said, let's make sure this child is not left behind. That's what it
says.

This is a bill that says, in return for federal money, we will measure,
we'll adjust, we'll change to achieve the most important objective of all,
to make sure every single child in America can read by the 3rd grade and
stay at grade level, that children can read and write and add and subtract.

Listen, I've been through this debate about testing. Again, I remember when
I was the governor of Texas, there was a lot of people saying, how can you
be for testing? My answer is, how can you not be for testing? They said it
was discriminatory to test. I said it's discriminatory not to test. If you
can't know what a child -- whether a child can read and write, how can you
solve the problem? I've heard people say, oh, all you're doing is teaching
to test. My answer is, if you teach a child how to read, they will pass the
test. Accountability is crucial, in my judgment, for making sure the public
school system meets the important goals of our society.

Having said all that, an important part of the No Child Left Behind Act is
the understanding that one size does not fit all when it comes to public
schools, and that the governance ought to be local. If you've noticed, I've
never said the federal government is going to tell you how to teach. That
would be the worst thing that could happen to the public school system. The
worst possible thing is we're sending you money and now we're going to tell
you how to use it, and how to teach and what curriculum to use. That's the
opposite of the spirit of the No Child Left Behind Act. The No Child Left
Behind Act understands there needs to be flexibility and local control of
schools.

We did not design a federal test. There was great pressure to say, let's
have a federal test. All that would mean, that once you have a federal test
it could lead to local prescriptions for that test. We said the states
ought to develop their own accountability systems, and that local people
ought to have input into the design of the state at the -- of local
accountability systems. And so for those of you who think, well, the
federal government has reached too far into the governance issue, it's just
not true. It's not the case. As a matter of fact, quite the contrary; it
makes sure that there was local control of schools. It made sure that the
state had the option and opportunity to say to the local superintendent and
principals, design your program that works. You're closest to the people,
you listen to the parents, you see the issues firsthand in the neighborhood
in which you live; come up with a curriculum that meets your own needs.

The system is working. That's what's important for people to understand.
And by the way, any attempt to roll back the accountability in Washington,
D.C. will be -- I'll fight any attempt to do that. I'm just not going to
let it happen. We're making too much progress. There's an achievement gap
in America that's closing. We don't need achievement gaps in this country.
It's not good for us to have achievement gaps where certain kids can read
in 4th grade better than others. One of our goals has got to be to achieve
that -- close that achievement gap. And we're doing it. How do we know?
Because we're measuring.

There's what they called the nation's report card -- it's the National
Assessment of Educational Process, NAEP. It's a way to kind of norm testing
scores across states, without having a national test. It's a way to
determine whether or not the great state of Maryland is doing okay relative
to your neighboring states, for example. It's a way for us to kind of get a
glimpse about whether or not we're making progress toward achieving certain
goals. In 2005, America's 4th graders posted the best scores in reading and
math in the history of the test. That's positive. Ever since the test has
been issued, 2005 was the best scores. If we didn't test, by the way, you
could never say -- I could never stand up and say this. I'd just be
guessing, wouldn't I? It could be that we're doing fine, maybe not, maybe
so.

African American 4th graders set records in reading and math in 2005.
Hispanic 4th graders set records in reading and math. That's really good.
It's important for our country that all children from all walks of life
have the ability to realize the great promise of the country. The NAEP also
showed that 8th graders earned the best math scores ever recorded; 8th
grade Hispanic and African American students achieved the highest math
scores ever.

As I said, there's an achievement gap -- we know because we measure -- and
it's closing, and that's positive. And our goal has got to be to continue
to work to make sure there is no achievement gap in America.

Now, let me talk about North Glen Elementary School. I don't know if you --
those of you interested in this school have paid attention to these
results, but I would like to share -- (applause) -- if I might, I'd like to
share some statistics with you, and perhaps this will give you an
indication about why Laura and I came here.

In 2003, 50 percent -- 57 percent of North Glen students scored proficient
in reading -- 57 percent -- and 46 percent were proficient in math. Now,
that's unacceptable. Fifty-seven percent is a lousy number. Forty-six
percent, obviously, is even worse. But it was unacceptable to the
principals and the superintendent and the teachers -- that's most
important. And so they got after it and they figured out how to make sure
that goals were met.

I didn't spend a lot of time talking today to the principal about the
different analysis that went on, but I bet it was pretty in-depth. But one
thing for certain is, the test in '03 said, we better do something
different. When we find out something is going right, let's stay on it, and
if something is going wrong, let's change. That's what happened here,
because, guess what -- in 2005, 82 percent of North Glen students were
ranked proficient in reading, and 84 percent were ranked proficient in
math. (Applause.)

It's great news, isn't it? It's a system that says, why don't we show
everybody whether or not we can succeed. And if we're not, we'll change;
and if we are, we now have a chance to have the old President come by and
say, thanks, you know. (Laughter.)

Interestingly enough, in 2003, 45 percent of the African American students
in this school rated proficient in reading; in 2005, 84 percent are
proficient. In other words, this is a school that believes every child can
learn. Not just certain children, every child. And then they work to see to
it that it happens. This -- the statistics I just announced -- oh, by the
way, in 2003, 35 percent of African American students rated proficient in
math. You've got to know math if you're going to compete in this
21st-century world. It's really important that math and science become a
focal point of our high schools, for example. But it's not going to work if
kids coming out of elementary school can't do math. Thirty-five percent of
the African American students rated proficient in math; now it's 82
percent. It's a good score. (Applause.)

This is a fine school. We're here to herald excellence. We're here to
praise the law that is working. I'm here to thank the teachers, not only
here, but around the state of Maryland and around the country, who are
dedicating their lives to providing hope for our future. I want to thank
the members of Congress for working together on this vital piece of
legislation, a piece of legislation that's laying the cornerstone for a
hopeful tomorrow.

Laura and I's [sic] spirits are uplifted any time we go to a school that's
working, because we understand the importance of public education in the
future of our country. We also believe, strongly believe, that every child
can learn. And with the right focus and right energy, every child will
learn. And as every child learns, the future of this country will never
have been brighter.

Thanks for a job well done. God bless the teachers here, and the principal.
God bless the parents. And may God bless the students, as well. Thank you.
(Applause.)

END 10:51 A.M. EST

===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060109-2.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)